Musk slams Trump agenda bill as a 'disgusting abomination' days after W.H. send-offNew Foto - Musk slams Trump agenda bill as a 'disgusting abomination' days after W.H. send-off

Elon Musk issued a blistering criticism ofthe massive Republican billfor President Donald Trump's agenda Tuesday, posting on X that it is a "disgusting abomination." "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,"Musk wrote. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." "It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt," added Musk, who left the White House last week. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said the package would increase the deficit by $2.3 trillion with its tax cuts and spending hikes on immigration enforcement in the military outstripping the savings. Musk, a top Republican donor during the 2024 elections, doubled down later in the day,posting on X: "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." Musk, the CEO of Tesla, haspreviously signaled his disappointmentin the legislation, telling CBS News he believed it was a "massive spending bill" that "undermines" the work of his Department of Government Efficiency operation. The remarks came as an unwelcome surprise to Republicans on Tuesday as the Senate considers changes to the version passed by the House while seeking to placate competing factions internally, including those that want to reduce the red ink. "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of opinion," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters. "He's entitled to that opinion, but we're going to proceed full speed ahead." House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said it was "a dangerous thing" for Musk to be "meddling with" the economy, noting that a debt limit hike to avert a default was part of the bill. "This is the key to the economic resurgence of America. It's going to be jet fuel for the economy. And the sooner we do it, the better," Johnson told reporters. "And by the way, the debt ceiling is also revved into this legislation. That is a dangerous thing for Elon or anyone who has who cares about the U.S. economy to be meddling with. And I think the risk is very great." Musk's comments emboldened fiscal hawks like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., two rare Republicans who have voted against the measure consistently. Some GOP senators who have supported the measure conceded that there was at least some validity to Musk's view. "I think he has a point," Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said, adding that Musk wasn't giving enough credit to the "growth" that the tax cuts would bring. "I like Elon Musk, but he's one man." Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, told NBC News: "The Senate should make the bill substantially better, and I hope and believe we will do that. There's no doubt we need to reduce spending more." Other Republicans dismissed Musk's criticism. "I ain't got any thoughts on that. We got a lot of work to do," Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala. "He doesn't get to vote." The White Houseis seeking to codify $9.4 billion in cutsproposed by DOGE, the advisory entity Musk helmed in the initial months of Trump's second administration. Asked Tuesday at a news briefing about Musk's initial post, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." The White House declined to offer additional comment. Democrats, meanwhile, welcomed Musk's criticism. "I agree with Elon Musk," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., calling his own words "something I didn't think was imaginable" for him to say. Still, some doubted his intentions. "A broken clock is right twice a day," Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., joked, while doubting that Musk's criticism was about sincere concern for deficits. "I don't think there's an ounce of sincerity in Elon Musk's interest in trying to reduce red ink," Murphy said. "I think DOGE was a very transparent play to increase his profile and to help his businesses." The bill as it stands would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime work and boost funding for immigration enforcement and the military. It would also make cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. The Housenarrowly passedthe broader package last month, but it still has several steps to clear before it reaches Trump's desk. Any changes the Senate makes would have to go back through the House, where Republicans hold a small majority, before it can be signed into law. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., a close Trump ally who voted for the measure,expressed regret on Xon Tuesday over a provision she said she didn't know was included. "Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years," she said, referring to the legislation dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill." "I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there. … This needs to be stripped out in the Senate." Musk criticized the bill just days after Trump gave him an official send-off from the Oval Office. His stint in Washington has beenthe subject of withering criticism, with many pointing out that Musk, the wealthiest person in the world,was able to achieve only a fraction of the $2 trillion in cuts he had set out to make. They also hint at lingering tensions with the Trump administration — some of which made their way to the public through news reports abouttense meetingsandshouting matches. Musk previously took some of his grievances public, includingcriticism of Trump's tariffs. Meanwhile, Musk's public profile has suffered — as did the perception of his most consumer-centric business, Tesla. Tesla shares are down about 13% this yearas sales have flagged.

Musk slams Trump agenda bill as a 'disgusting abomination' days after W.H. send-off

Musk slams Trump agenda bill as a 'disgusting abomination' days after W.H. send-off Elon Musk issued a blistering criticism ofthe ma...
Hegseth orders the name of gay rights activist Harvey Milk scrubbed from Navy shipNew Foto - Hegseth orders the name of gay rights activist Harvey Milk scrubbed from Navy ship

WASHINGTON (AP) —Defense Secretary Pete Hegsethhas ordered the Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, a highly rare move that will strip the ship of the moniker of a slain gay rights activist who served as a sailor during the Korean War. U.S. officials say Navy Secretary John Phelan put together a small team to rename the replenishment oiler and that a new name is expected this month. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said the next name had not yet been chosen. The change was laid out in an internal memo that officials said defended the action as a move to align withPresident Donald Trumpand Hegseth's objectives to "re-establish the warrior culture." It marks the latest move by Hegseth and the wider Trump administration topurge all programs, policies, books and social media mentionsof references to diversity, equity and inclusion. And it comes duringPride Month— the same timing as the Pentagon's campaign toforce transgender troops outof the U.S. military. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement that Hegseth is "committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos." Phelan's office did not respond to a request for comment on the decision, which was first reported by Military.com. The USNS Harvey Milk was named in 2016 by then-Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, who said at the time that the John Lewis-class of oilers would be named after leaders who fought for civil and human rights. Milk, who was portrayed by Sean Penn in an Oscar-winning 2008 movie, served for four years in the Navy before he was forced out for being gay. He later became one of the first openly gay candidates elected to public office. Milk served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and had sponsored a bill banning discrimination based on sexual orientation in public accommodations, housing and employment. It passed, and San Francisco Mayor George Moscone signed it into law. On Nov. 27, 1978, Milk and Moscone were assassinated by Dan White, a disgruntled former city supervisor who cast the sole vote against Milk's bill. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat representing San Francisco, said in a statement Tuesday that "this spiteful move does not strengthen our national security or the 'warrior' ethos. Instead, it is a surrender of a fundamental American value: to honor the legacy of those who worked to build a better country." California Gov. Gavin Newsom also slammed the move, saying Milk was a Korean War combat veteran whose commander called him "outstanding." "Stripping his name from a Navy ship won't erase his legacy as an American icon, but it does reveal Trump's contempt for the very values our veterans fight to protect," the Democrat wrote on X. Theship was christened in 2021, and during the ceremony, then-Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro said he wanted to be at the event "not just to amend the wrongs of the past, but to give inspiration to all of our LGBTQ community leaders who served in the Navy, in uniform today and in the civilian workforce as well, too, and to tell them that we're committed to them in the future." The ship is operated by Military Sealift Command, with a crew of about 125 civilian mariners. The Navy says it conducted its first resupply mission at sea in fall 2024, while operating in the Virginia Capes. It continued to resupply Navy ships at sea off the East Coast until it began scheduled maintenance at Alabama Shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, earlier this year. While the renaming is rare, the Biden administration also changed the names of two Navy ships in 2023 as part of the effort toremove Confederate namesfrom U.S. military installations. The USS Chancellorsville — named for the Civil War battle — was renamed the USS Robert Smalls after a sailor and former enslaved person. And the USNS Maury, an oceanographic survey ship originally named after a Confederate sailor, was renamed the USNS Marie Tharp after a geologist and oceanographic cartographer who created the first scientific maps of the Atlantic Ocean floor. Maritime lore hints as to why renaming ships is so unusual, suggesting that changing a name is bad luck and tempts retribution from the sea gods.

Hegseth orders the name of gay rights activist Harvey Milk scrubbed from Navy ship

Hegseth orders the name of gay rights activist Harvey Milk scrubbed from Navy ship WASHINGTON (AP) —Defense Secretary Pete Hegsethhas ordere...
Jim Marshall, NFL ironman and 'wrong way run' central figure, dies at 87New Foto - Jim Marshall, NFL ironman and 'wrong way run' central figure, dies at 87

Jim Marshall, famous for both his status as an NFL ironman and also his role in the infamous"wrong way run"in 1964, died Tuesday at age 87,according to the Minnesota Vikings. No cause of death was provided, though the team noted it followed a "lengthy hospitalization." Marshall started 270 consecutive regular-season games for the Vikings from 1961-79, which is still the record for a defender. When Brett Favre set the consecutive starts record in September 2009, it was Marshall's mark he broke. The Ohio State product helped the Vikings reach four Super Bowls in the 1970s as part of their famed "Purple People Eaters" defensive line and was a three-time All-Pro and a two-time Pro Bowler. He also served as a team captain for 14 consecutive seasons. Marshall started his career in the CFL and was drafted by the Cleveland Browns in 1960 before being traded to the expansion Vikings the following year. In the 2000s,NFL Films ranked himas the second-best player not in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Marshall's most famous moment — unfortunately for him, though he was a good sport about it — is the "wrong way run." During a game on Oct. 25, 1964, Marshall scooped up a fumble by San Francisco 49ers running back Billy Kilmer and returned it 66 yards ... into his own end zone, for a safety. "Seeing the ball loose, seeing the goal post, kinda triggered 'pick it up and run,'" Marshall later said. In 1964, Jim Marshall of the Vikings recovered a@49ersfumble, and literally ran 60 yards the wrong way. 🤦‍♂️#SFvsMINpic.twitter.com/gvOB3Y8KFa — NFL Legacy (@NFLLegacy)September 7, 2018 Marshall said that one of the 49ers' players came up and thanked him. "You knew right away, you really messed up this time," Marshall said. After Marshall's run, former California Golden Bears center Roy Riegels, who returned a fumble into his own end zone in the 1929 Rose Bowl, sent Marshall a note that said, "Welcome to the club." Marshall's legacy is much broader than one admittedly immortalized gaffe, and he credited fans for supporting him in that respect over the years. "A lot of the people have come up to me talking seriously about this and said, 'You know, we really have a lot of respect for you continuing on after that and doing as well as you did and playing as long as you played,'" Marshall said.

Jim Marshall, NFL ironman and 'wrong way run' central figure, dies at 87

Jim Marshall, NFL ironman and 'wrong way run' central figure, dies at 87 Jim Marshall, famous for both his status as an NFL ironman ...
Stanley Cup Final 2025: Oilers vs. Panthers prediction, odds, best bets for Game 1, seriesNew Foto - Stanley Cup Final 2025: Oilers vs. Panthers prediction, odds, best bets for Game 1, series

The Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers will face off in theStanley Cup Finalfor the second consecutive season, beginning Wednesday night (8 p.m. ET, TNT). The Panthers won last year's Stanley Cup in seven games, but enter this year's series as slight underdogs (+105 atBetMGM), while the Oilers are -125 favorites. The Oilers are -130 home favorites at BetMGM in Game 1, with the Panthers as +110 underdogs with a game total of six goals. Yahoo Sports asked handicapperJosh Inglisabout a few of his best bets for the Stanley Cup Final: Inglis:"I like the Panthers in the series at -110 or better, but I'll take the Game 1 price here at +115. I'm not worried too much about home-ice advantage in this series as Florida has been lights out on the road in the playoffs, and the Panthers have been -160, -180 and -125 series favorites in each series where they were the road team. "This is the much deeper lineup, and the longer the playoffs go, Edmonton's depth will be exposed. Florida is still tough to match up against on the road as its third line has possibly been its best line in the playoffs." Best bets:Panthers Game 1 ML +115, Panthers to win series +105 Inglis:"Evan Rodrigues is still undervalued in the prop market, which is spilling over into his series point markets. The winger is playing on the top line for the Panthers and the first power play. He should be -150 or shorter for a point but is priced at around +100 to get one in Game 1. "In the previous round, he tied for the team lead in points with seven. He averaged almost 18 minutes per game vs. the Hurricanes and is showing finish, as well as some play-making ability [six assists]. "I think Alex Barkov is the best bet for the Conn Smythe at +600 and that means Rodrigues is tagging along as he will play his 5-on-5 and power-play shifts all with the elite center. Even if this series is a sweep, this plus-money prop has legs." Best bet:Evan Rodrigues to record five points in the series +210

Stanley Cup Final 2025: Oilers vs. Panthers prediction, odds, best bets for Game 1, series

Stanley Cup Final 2025: Oilers vs. Panthers prediction, odds, best bets for Game 1, series The Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers will fac...
Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortionsNew Foto - Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would revoke guidance to the nation's hospitals that directed them to provide emergencyabortionsfor women when they are necessary to stabilize their medical condition. Thatguidancewas issued to hospitals in 2022, weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court upended national abortion rights in the U.S. It was an effort by the Biden administration to preserve abortion access for extreme cases in which women were experiencing medical emergencies and needed an abortion to prevent organ loss or severe hemorrhaging, among other serious complications. The Biden administration had argued that hospitals — including states with near-total bans — needed to provide emergency abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. That law requires emergency rooms that receive Medicare dollars to provide an exam and stabilizing treatment for all patients. Nearly all emergency rooms in the U.S. rely on Medicare funds. The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would no longer enforce that policy The move prompted concerns from some doctors and abortion rights advocates that women will not get emergency abortions in states with strict bans. "The Trump Administration would rather women die in emergency rooms than receive life-saving abortions," Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. "In pulling back guidance, this administration is feeding the fear and confusion that already exists at hospitals in every state where abortion is banned. Hospitals need more guidance, not less, to stop them from turning away patients experiencing pregnancy crises." Anti-abortion advocates praised the move, however. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of SBA Pro-Life America, said in a statement that the Biden-era policy had been a way to expand abortion access in states where it was banned. "Democrats have created confusion on this fact to justify their extremely unpopular agenda for all-trimester abortion," she said. "In situations where every minute counts, their lies lead to delayed care and put women in needless, unacceptable danger." An Associated Pressinvestigationlast year found that, even with the Biden administration's guidance, dozens of pregnant women were being turned away from emergency rooms, including some who needed emergency abortions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which investigates hospitals that are not in compliance, said in a statement that it will continue to enforce the federal law that, "including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy." But CMS added that it would also "rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions." The Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion law that initially only allowed abortions to save the life of the mother. The federal governmenthad arguedbefore the U.S. Supreme Court last year that Idaho's law was in conflict with the federal law, which requires stabilizing treatment that prevents a patient's condition from worsening. The U.S. Supreme Court issued a procedural ruling in the case last year that left key questions unanswered about whether doctors in abortion ban states can terminate pregnancies when a woman is at risk of serious infection, organ loss or hemorrhage.

Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions

Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration announce...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com