New York City Democratic mayoral primary debate: six key takeawaysNew Foto - New York City Democratic mayoral primary debate: six key takeaways

In the first debate of the New York City Democratic mayoral primary, nine candidates took the stage andfielded questionson housing, affordability, crime, policing, public safety, political regrets and how each candidate would handle the Trump administration if elected. The candidates included former New York governor Andrew Cuomo; democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani; the New York City council speaker, Adrienne Adams; the current New York City comptroller, Brad Lander; former comptroller Scott Stringer; former Bronx assemblyman Michael Blake; state senators Zellnor Myrie and Jessica Ramos; and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson. The current mayor, Eric Adams, was not present on Wednesday as he is running for re-electionas an independent candidate, although he ran as a Democrat in 2021. A few takeaways from the debate: Throughout the debate, former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, the current frontrunner in the race, was grilled on his record by his Democratic rivals. Related:Democratic candidates for New York mayor spar over housing, Covid and Trump Cuomo spent much of the night sparring with progressive state assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, who is polling second. Mamdani accused Cuomo of being beholden to wealthy donors and corporate interests, saying Cuomo prioritized the "1%, the billionaires and the profitable corporations", over "working-class New Yorkers". Cuomo dismissed the 33-year-old as inexperienced, calling Mamdani "very good on Twitter and with videos" but saying he was someone who "produces nothing". "He's been in government 27 minutes, he passed three bills, that's all he's done," Cuomo said. "He has no experience with Washington, no experience with New York City." Trump came up several times, as the candidates agreed the next mayor must be ready to stand up to his administration if elected mayor, though they differed on who was best equipped to do so. "I know how to deal with Donald Trump because I've dealt with him before," Cuomo said, citing his experience as New York governor. Mamdani warned that "President Trump will target whomever is the next mayor of this city" and said that is "important that we have a mayor who will fight back and that is what I will do". "I am Donald Trump's worst nightmare as a progressive Muslim immigrant who actually fights for the things that I believe in," Mamdani added. "And the difference between myself and Andrew Cuomo is that my campaign is not funded by the very billionaires who put Donald Trump in DC." Cuomo fired back, saying that "Donald Trump would go through Mr Mamdani like a hot knife through butter". "He would be Trump's delight," Cuomo added. Mamdani countered: "It's true that I don't have experience with corrupt Trump billionaires that are funding my campaign. I don't have experience with party politics and insider consultants. I do have experience, however, with winning $450m in debt relief for thousands of working-class taxi drivers and actually delivering for working-class people." Adrienne Adams, the speaker of the New York city council, said she would take legal action against Trump when necessary. Asked how they would respond if the Trump administration ordered city-run hospitals to stop providing care to undocumented patients or risk losing millions in federal funding, all candidates voiced strong opposition to Trump's recent crackdown on immigration in general. "You cannot give in to Mr Trump and his demands," Cuomo said. "If you give in to him, he is a bully, I know him well, if you give in to him today, you will be giving him your lunch money for the rest of your life." "You have to fight him and the way you fight him is not by suing him," the former governor said. "We need a national coalition, which we can put together of like-minded states and cities that will oppose these actions and then we're going to have to eventually beat him politically in Congress." Whitney Tilson said that if Trump were to act "illegally to try and blackmail us, you have to sue to restore that funding", adding that he was "appalled by what Trump is doing to terrorize immigrant communities" and would "fight him tooth and nail". Mamdani said that New York City was "under attack by an authoritarian Trump administration". "The way that we fight back is ensure that our local institutions continue to provide the services to each and every New Yorker," he said. "We will tell those institutions that we will provide that funding and we will get that funding by taxing the 1% and the wealthiest corporations." Pressed about his administration's handling ofnursing home deaths during the Covid-19 pandemic– a 2021 report by the New York attorney general found that his officeundercounted thousandsof deaths of state nursing home residents – Cuomo defended his record, claiming the numbers were not, in fact, undercounted. He also deniedthe sexual harassment allegationsagainst him that led to his resignation. "I said at the time that if I offended anyone it was unintentional but I apologize and I say that today," he said. City council speaker Adrienne Adams took a swipe at the current mayor. "My biggest regret is believing that Eric Adams would be a good mayor for all New Yorkers," she said. The city's comptroller, Brad Lander, said that he regretted not pushing "for more housing in his Brooklyn district when he was a city council member". Mandani used the moment to target Cuomo once more, saying that "as a Democrat, one of my regrets is having trusted the leaders within our own party, leaders like Andrew Cuomo". Cuomo, on the other hand, said his biggest regret was "the state of the Democratic party", which prompted backlash from other candidates on stage. "No personal regrets?" asked Adrienne Adams. "No regrets when it comes to cutting Medicaid or healthcare? No regrets when it comes to slow-walking PPE and vaccinations in the season of Covid to Black and brown communities? Really, no regrets?" Cuomo said her claims were "not accurate", adding: "Medicaid went up under me. I pushed President Trump to give us everything he had, leading the way during Covid." The moderators asked the candidates how much they pay in rent or mortgage in New York City. Adams said she owned her home and that it was paid off; Mamdani said he pays $2,300 a month in rent for a rent-stabilized apartment in Astoria. Blake said he spends about $1,800 for a home that he owns, while Myrie said his rent-stabilized apartment was $1,300 a month and Ramos said her rent was $2,500 a month. Lander said his mortgage was $3,300 a month. Cuomo said that he pays $7,800 a month, while Tilson said that he owned his home and paid about $5,000 per month in maintenance fees and taxes. Stringer said he pays $6,400.

New York City Democratic mayoral primary debate: six key takeaways

New York City Democratic mayoral primary debate: six key takeaways In the first debate of the New York City Democratic mayoral primary, nine...
US announces pick for NATO's next Supreme Allied CommanderNew Foto - US announces pick for NATO's next Supreme Allied Commander

By Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali and Lili Bayer WASHINGTON/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration announced on Thursday its nomination for the next top U.S. general in Europe and said the U.S. military officer would also assume the traditional role of Supreme Allied Commander Europe. Trump's decision to nominate U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Alexus Grynkewich to both roles, which was first reported by Reuters, will relieve European NATO allies and even some of Trump's fellow Republicans amid concerns about a retrenchment in American military leadership of NATO. Grynkewich must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The position of SACEUR, which oversees all NATO operations in Europe, has been filled by a U.S. general since its creation after World War Two. U.S. Army General Dwight D. Eisenhower became the alliance's first SACEUR in 1951. Still, since taking office in January, Trump's administration has pressured NATO allies to ramp up their defense spending, saying Europe should be primarily responsible for defense on the European continent. Trump has also said he wants NATO allies to boost investment in defense to 5% of gross domestic product, up from the current target of 2%. Speaking at NATO headquarters earlier on Thursday, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he was confident that members of the NATO alliance would agree to a major boost in defense spending. No country is yet at 5%, not even the U.S., but Hegseth said there was progress on agreeing to the target. "I'm very encouraged by what we heard in there," Hegseth said after a morning meeting of NATO defense ministers on Thursday in Brussels. "Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment to NATO." Grynkewich, who is now the director for operations at the U.S. military's Joint Staff, would succeed Army General Christopher Cavoli, who has been in the role since shortly after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, helping oversee billions of dollars in U.S. security assistance to Kyiv. (Reporting by Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali and Lili Bayer; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Marguerita Choy)

US announces pick for NATO's next Supreme Allied Commander

US announces pick for NATO's next Supreme Allied Commander By Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali and Lili Bayer WASHINGTON/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - P...
How Trump's travel ban will (and won't) affect World Cup, sportsNew Foto - How Trump's travel ban will (and won't) affect World Cup, sports

President Donald Trump's Wednesday proclamationrestricting travel to the United States by people from a dozen countries will not apply to athletes competing at soccer's2026 World Cupor the 2028 Olympics, but could impact fans, friends and extended family of those athletes hoping to come to the U.S. for the hugely popular sporting events. Trump's travel ban, which will take effect Monday, applies to citizens of Iran, whose men's national soccer team has already qualified for the upcoming World Cup, which will be held in the U.S., Canada and Mexico next summer. But Section 4, subsection (b), paragraph (iv) of Wednesday's proclamation grants "exceptions" to "any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State." The big unknown, sports immigration experts told Yahoo Sports, is how broad the State Department's definitions of "major sporting event," "necessary support role" and "immediate relatives" will be. Experts expect that soccer's2025 Club World Cup— which does not feature a team from one of the 12 countries, but will feature a few players from those countries — will also qualify as a "major sporting event," especially given theTrump administration's strong relations with FIFA, soccer's global governing body and the tournament's organizer. It is less clear whether the 2025 Gold Cup, a regional tournament that also begins in the U.S. the same day (June 14), will qualify for the exemption. If it doesn't, the national team of Haiti — another of the 12 countries on Trump's list — would be impacted. It is scheduled to face the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago in Group D. Spokespeople for the State Department, FIFA and CONCACAF — the North, Central American and Caribbean soccer confederation in charge of the Gold Cup — either did not immediately respond to questions or could not confirm whether their events were exempted. The wording of the proclamation, experts pointed out, gives the State Department broad discretion to exempt certain events but apply the ban to others, based on any number of criteria or factors. Some athletes looking to travel stateside for minor events — especially pre-professional tournaments or competitions — will likely be affected. And fans will almost certainly be affected, the experts said. FIFA and its president, Gianni Infantino, have repeatedly claimed that "America will welcome the world — everyone who wants to come here to enjoy [the World Cup], to have fun, to celebrate the game, will be able to do that." But there areno indications or expectations that fans will get special treatmentfrom the consular officers responsible for issuing visitor visas. With the ban in place, thousands of Iranian fans could be denied entry and prevented from following their team at the tournament. The other 11 countries on the banned list — Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen — have either been eliminated from World Cup qualification or are unlikely to qualify, though Sudan and Haiti are in contention. Regardless of their teams' qualification status, though, people from those countries could still be interested in visiting for the tournament.From October 2022 to September 2023— the last fiscal year for which data is available — the U.S. admitted more than 100,000 non-immigrants who were visiting for business or pleasure and were citizens of the 12 countries, according to government data. A majority of those visitors were Haitian citizens. Some Haitians who are dual citizens will still be able to travel to the U.S. on their non-Haitian passport. But those without dual citizenship, and who do not meet the criteria forother exemptions, will be barred. (The ban, generally, applies to both immigrants and non-immigrants.) Among the seven countries subject to partial travel restrictions — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela — Venezuela is in contention to qualify for the 2026 World Cup. Cuba could also contend for a place at the 48-team tournament. Many, if not all, of the 19 countries targeted will send athletes to the 2028 Olympics, which will be held in and around Los Angeles two summers later. It's unclear to what extent their support staff and extended family members might be impacted by the ban — which could, of course, be challenged or changed between now and 2026 or 2028.

How Trump's travel ban will (and won't) affect World Cup, sports

How Trump's travel ban will (and won't) affect World Cup, sports President Donald Trump's Wednesday proclamationrestricting trav...
If SEC wants more College Football Playoff respect, it's time to dump cupcake gamesNew Foto - If SEC wants more College Football Playoff respect, it's time to dump cupcake games

The SEC keeps finding newreasons to not add a ninth conference gameto its football schedule. Throughout the four-teamCollege Football Playoffera, the SEC ruled that postseason format, so it found insufficient incentive to add another conference game. When the scheduling debate resurfaced two years ago, some SEC members expressed reluctance to add another conference game without additional compensation from its media partner. ESPN didn't sweeten the pot. The SEC stayed at eight. The latest excuse? Many SEC coaches feel loath to welcome a ninth conference game without first knowing the College Football Playoff format for 2026 and beyond. What's next, no ninth SEC game until there's peace in the Middle East? I'm losing my appetite for this eight-or-nine debate. The number should be 10 – as in, every power-conference team should play a minimum of 10 games against Power Four opponents. MAN WITH PLAN:Lane Kiffin pushes promising 16-team playoff model BIG DECISION:SEC's Greg Sankey can be hero or villain in playoff debate The SEC routinely insists it should gain preference from the playoff selection committee because of its run of national championship dominance the past 20 years, plus its strength of schedule. I won't argue that the SEC often boasts the strongest top-to-bottom conference. The SEC's pandering to the playoff committee, though, plays weak considering how the conference structures its schedule. Teams only play half the other members of their 16-team conference, and most only play one Power Four non-conference opponent, while supplementing the schedule with a few layup games. In this era of the ever-expanding playoff, it is time for the SEC to curtail its feast of cupcake games. Either stay at eight conference games, or go to nine – so long as it adds up to 10 games against real competition. Power Four teams playing more games against legitimate opponents – and fewer games against directional schools – would provide clarity to the playoff's at-large selection process. Alabama, Florida and South Carolina will play 10 regular-season games against Power Four opponents. The SEC's other teams will play eight or nine games against power foes. By comparison, TCU andBaylorwill play a nation-leading 11 games against Power Four competition. Let's not spare the ACC, either. The ACC joins the SEC in playing eight conference games, while their Big Ten and Big 12 peers play nine. Most ACC schools, at least, will play 10 games against power-conference opponents, if you include Notre Dame as a power foe. Prominent SEC voices continue to trumpet that the committee erred by rejecting three 9-3 teams from the inaugural 12-team playoff, and that the committee does not sufficiently reward the SEC's schedule. "I have a hard time seeingOle Miss, Alabama, and South Carolina not being in the best teams last year," Georgia coach Kirby Smart said, in reference to 9-3 teams that didn't make the playoff. I maintain the committee flubbed by selecting two-loss SMU, which beat nobody of substance and lost its two games against Top 25 opponents. Mississippi, which smashed Georgia after suffering a résumé-staining loss to Kentucky, would have been a better choice. And yet, the SEC's three-loss also-rans could have tempted the committee more if they'd played and won another conference game or at least played and won an additional game against a Power Four opponent, instead of creaming a Championship Subdivision school. We don't know how the committee would view a 9-3 SEC team that played 10 games against Power Four competition. We do know what the committee thought of the SEC's 9-3 teams that played only nine games against power-conference foes. They thought them undeserving of a playoff bid. If Florida, which plays Miami and Florida State, goes 9-3 this season, it likely would have a stronger case for an at-large bid than the SEC's three-loss teams last season. The same is true of South Carolina, which plays Virginia Tech and Clemson for 10 Power Four games. Alabama's games against Wisconsin and Florida State give the Tide 10 games at the big-boy table, too. Those teams stand in exception to the SEC's majority that choose a path of lesser non-conference resistance. The SEC keeps floating the myth that the playoff committee does not respect strength of schedule. That's untrue. Indiana won 11 games last season, but the Hoosiers' soft schedule meant Indiana ranked behind four other at-large playoff qualifiers that won fewer games. Also, the SEC's three-loss teams reached the playoff's doorstep largely because of their strength of schedule. Another marquee victory could help get a three-loss team across the playoff's threshold. I can understand the SEC's reluctance to add a ninth conference game. Another league game would guarantee another loss to half the conference. Those additional losses would hinder playoff pursuits across half the league. The alternative to a ninth SEC game, though, should not be a game against Weasel Tech or Seventh-Grade State. Schedule another opponent from the big leagues. Non-conference scheduling includes the hurdle of needing two to tango. Not every power-conference team wants to play an SEC foe. Nebraska ducked out of its series with Tennessee. Wake Forest canceled on Ole Miss. Still, the SEC cannot relent. SEC coaches would be wise to keep the pedal down on this blue-sky idea of a Big Ten-SEC challenge. The SEC insists it wields the nation's strongest conference and that the committee should honor it as such. That argument holds merit, but the case would become easier to prove if SEC teams scheduled fewer games against Coastal Cupcake and more games against power-conference peers. Blake Toppmeyeris the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him atBToppmeyer@gannett.comand follow him on X@btoppmeyer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:SEC wants College Football Playoff respect? Stop playing cupcakes

If SEC wants more College Football Playoff respect, it's time to dump cupcake games

If SEC wants more College Football Playoff respect, it's time to dump cupcake games The SEC keeps finding newreasons to not add a ninth ...
Trump directs probe into Biden's use of autopen, Biden says policy decisions were hisNew Foto - Trump directs probe into Biden's use of autopen, Biden says policy decisions were his

By Jeff Mason WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump directed his White House counsel on Wednesday to investigate whether former President Joe Biden's aides covered up alleged mental decline and unlawfully used an autopen on Biden's behalf to sign policy documents. Biden, who is fighting cancer, said he was responsible for the decisions made during his administration and suggested Trump's move was designed to distract Americans from a bill in Congress that would extend tax cuts for the wealthy. Republican Trump has long asserted that Biden, a Democrat who defeated him in the 2020 presidential election, was mentally incompetent and has suggested the use of a mechanical pen to sign memos, executive orders and grants of clemency during Biden's four-year-term may have been improper, potentially rendering them invalid. In a statement late on Wednesday, Biden dismissed those suggestions. "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false," he said in a statement. Biden's team said the use of an autopen is a well established legal practice following a presidential decision. The former president, now 82, stepped aside as the Democratic presidential candidate last year after a disastrous debate against Trump underscored concerns about his age and ability to serve as commander-in-chief for four more years. Trump defeated former Vice President Kamala Harris, who became the Democratic presidential nominee, in November. Biden's office said last month that the former president had been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. That development and a new book that cites concerns among Democratic insiders about Biden's mental acuity as he was seeking re-election have brought renewed attention to the former president's health. While in office, Biden's aides denied that his mental acuity had dipped even as they acknowledged he had aged. Though he wished Biden well after the cancer diagnosis, Trump has continued to criticize his predecessor for a host of challenges facing the country. His move to investigate aspects of Biden's time in power took those criticisms to a new level. In a memorandum, Trump ordered his White House counsel, in consultation with the attorney general, to probe whether "certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President." The investigation would also look into documents that were signed by autopen, those who directed the use of that device, and any efforts to "purposefully shield" the public from information about Biden's physical and mental health. "In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline," the memo said. "There are serious doubts as to the decision making process and even the degree of Biden's awareness of ... actions being taken in his name." A senior official in Trump's Justice Department told staff on Monday that he has been directed to investigate whether Biden was competent and whether others had taken advantage of him through the use of an autopen when he granted clemency to members of his family and death row inmates at the end of his term. (Reporting by Jeff Mason; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)

Trump directs probe into Biden's use of autopen, Biden says policy decisions were his

Trump directs probe into Biden's use of autopen, Biden says policy decisions were his By Jeff Mason WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com