Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOPNew Foto - Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP

Sen. Thom Tillis was fed up, and took to the Senate floor to unload on PresidentDonald Trump's megabill. As the bill cleared a key hurdle, Tillis issued a warning. He attributed his rise to U.S. senator from North Carolina to blowback against former President Barack Obama's 2010 health care law,the Affordable Care Act, which fueled crushing Democratic losses across the country. Republicans won control of the U.S. House, stopping Obama's legislative agenda in its tracks. The GOP is now rushing into similarly perilous territory, Tillis implied, by cutting more than $1 trillionfrom Medicaid. "Republicans are about to make a mistake on health care andbetraying a promise," he said. More:Medicaid 'churn': How working Americans could lose coverage under Trump tax bill The speech capped a consequential 24 hours for Tillis. He came out against Trump's legislation because of deep cuts to the federal health insurance program for low-income Americans, prompting the president tothreaten a primary challenge. Tillis thenannounced he wouldn't seek reelection in 2026. Tillis' experience sums up theexplosive politicssurrounding a nearly 1,000-page bill that has deeply divided the GOP. Many Republicans are touting it as a landmark achievement, but others are worried the unpopular measure hurts vulnerable people, goes against the party's working-class outreach, balloons the deficit and could cost Republicans dearly in the next election. Elon Musk, the multibillionaire former Trump adviser, is threatening to primary GOP lawmakers and even start a new political party over his deficit concerns. Looming over the debate is a president who threatens retribution against those who oppose him, and is pushing to have the legislationon his desk by July 4. Term-limited and free from facing voters again, Trump is looking for a legacy achievement. His supporters predict the bill will prove out over time. Sen.Jim Justice, R-West Virginia, compared the controversy to someone sticking their hand in a bucket of water and jerking it out. More:Thom Tillis, key Republican holdout on Trump's tax bill, won't seek reelection "The water's turbulent for a little while but then it'll just settle right out," he told USA TODAY. "That's what I think will happen." The bill narrowly cleared the Senate by a 51-50 vote on July 1 - three Republicans and every Democrat opposed it ,and Vice PresidentJD Vancehad to break the tie in a dramatic flourish - after a different version earlier passed the House. It now heads back to the House for final approval, where lawmakers have expressed concerns that the spending cuts either go too far, or not far enough. Trump said July 1 it would be "wise" for Republicans to get on board. "It's a great bill," Trump said, adding: "Great for the border, great for low taxes, and I would say that they have to do it." Despite some of the GOP resistance, bucking the president is politically perilous – as Tillis experienced − and Trump appears poised for a major legislative victory. The billwould enact key campaign promisesinto law – including cutting taxes on tipped wages and overtime pay and greatly expanded deportation efforts, which would receive a massive funding increase. It also makes permanent the sweeping tax reductions Trump passed in 2017, cementing his record as a big tax cutter. Trump launched his second term with an aggressive policy agenda, but hasrelied on executive ordersthat can easily be undone if Democrats reclaim the White House. His megabill – dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act - is a more lasting achievement, one that will help define his legacy. Yet like other major policy proposals from past presidents, the politics of the legislation have been difficult to navigate. Obama's health care bill divided Democrats, with 34 voting against it in the House. To help offset lost tax revenue, Trump's bill makes big cuts,most notably to Medicaid. That has some Republicans nervous. Any political victory from the bill could be short lived if it results in major blowback in the 2026 midterms. The legislation could complicate the GOP's pitch to blue collar voters. "This is a debate over the soul of the Republican Party," said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri. "Are we going to be a working class party or not?" More:Religious leaders protest GOP tax, Medicaid bill: 'It hurts working people' Democrats are eager to run against the bill, casting it as a largely benefiting the wealthy while hurting the poor. "The different ways in which this bill bites working families over and over is going to make it a problem for Republicans in the House and the Senate all the way through November of 2026 and beyond," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, told USA TODAY. An analysis of the House bill released last month by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the poorest households would lose about $1,600 a year under the legislation, largely because of cuts to Medicaid and food aid. The wealthiest households would gain about $12,000 a year,according to the CBO. The Senate bill has more aggressive cuts than the House. The CBO estimatesthat nearly 12 million people would lose Medicaid under the Senate bill, with the program facing roughly $1 trillion in cuts. More than250 people protestedthe deep cuts across from the Capitol at the steps of the Supreme Court on June 30, surrounded by dozens of caskets covered with statistics of how many people would lose Medicaid and food assistance in each state. The crowd chanted "you will not kill us and our people without a fight." Warren said criticism of the bill is resonating not just in blue states, but also red states, pointing to polling showing it's broadly unpopular. She recently drew 1,500 people to atown hall in Tennesseeblasting the legislation. "When people know anything about the Republican tax bill they hate it," she told USA TODAY. Republican lawmakers have largely rallied around Trump, accusing Democrats of misrepresenting the legislation. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said individual elements of the bill poll well but conceded the GOP has some "work to do" to sell the legislation. Trump ran a populist campaign that targeted blue collar voters with proposals such as tax cuts on tips and overtime, and Republicans have pointed to those provisions in the bill to counter criticism that it benefits the wealthy. But some Republican lawmakers worry cutting Medicaid could undermine GOP inroads to the working class. "You cannot be a working-class party if you are taking away healthcare for working class people," Hawley said over the weekend. Yet Hawley still supported the legislation, a sign of how intense the pressure is to deliver for Trump, who also is facing resistance from fiscal conservatives over projections the bill will increase the federal budget deficit by $3.3 trillion. Deficit hawks in the Senate ultimately caved and voted for the bill, and now attention turns to the House, where critics of the legislation's fiscal impact are being egged on by billionaire Elon Musk. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!"Musk wrote in a June 30 post on X. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people." Muskthreated primary challengesagainst GOP lawmakers who support the bill. Trump, meanwhile, is urging his party to fall in line and lashing out at dissenters such as Tillis and Rep. Thomas Massie, who voted against the legislation in the House. In the process, some lawmakers are bowing out. In addition to Tillis,Rep. Don Bacon, a moderate Nebraska Republican who has criticized Trump's megabill, announced he won't seek reelection. Losing lawmakers with bipartisan appeal could make it harder for the GOP to maintain their majorities. The North Carolina Senate race already was a toss up before Tillis resigned, noted University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato. It's even more competitive now, he said in a social media post. "Dems should send Trump a fruit basket of thanks,"Sabato said. Contributing: Sarah Wire This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump's big bill is a win. But it could also be a big problem for GOP

Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP

Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP Sen. Thom Tillis was fed up, and took to the Senate floor to unloa...
Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seatNew Foto - Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seat

President Donald Trumpsaid his daughter-in-law Lara Trump is his "first choice" to be the GOP nominee for the North Carolina U.S. Senate seat beingvacated by Sen. Thom Tillis, while also noting she doesn't live in the state. "She's a great person, Lara Trump," Trump told reporters July 1. "I mean, that would always be my first choice but she doesn't live there now, but she's there all the time... she really knows North Carolina well." Tillis announced over the weekend that he's not seeking reelection in 2026, creating an open seat in a key swing state.Tillis opposed Trump's signature legislation, criticizing Medicaid cuts in the bill, and Trumpthreatened to find a primary challengerbefore the senator announced he's not running again. Lara Trump, the wife of Trump's son Eric, previously had been discussed as a potential replacement for former Florida Sen.Marco Rubiowhen the president picked him to be secretary of state.Lara Trump said "would seriously consider"taking Rubio's seat but laterwithdrew her name from consideration. Lara Trump wasborn in Wilmington, North Carolina, raised in Wrightsville Beach and attended college in the state. She now lives in Florida. She co-chaired the Republican National Committee during the 2024 election and hosts a Fox News show. "Somebody that would really be great is Lara, she grew up there," Trump said of the race, before noting "they live in Florida, they have a very good life." Trump said he doesn't know who will run for the seat. He expects one of the congressmen from the state to "step up." Contributing: Iris Seaton This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Donald Trump promotes Lara Trump for North Carolina Senate seat

Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seat

Trump says daughter-in-law Lara 'first choice' for North Carolina Senate seat President Donald Trumpsaid his daughter-in-law Lara Tr...
2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his returnNew Foto - 2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his return

The 2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest will take place at 12 p.m. ET Friday on ESPN2 andfeatures the return of 16-time champion Joey Chestnut. Chestnut was banned from the event last year as a result of his partnership with Impossible Foods, a rival brand. Chestnut and Nathan's seem to have resolved their differences, as he returns to the contest and is a massive favorite at sportsbooks. Chestnut opened as a -2500 favorite (bet $25 to win $1) atBetMGMto win this year's contest, with last year's champion, Patrick Bertoletti, owning the second-best odds all the way back at 16-1 (bet $1 to win $16). Bertoletti consumed 58 hot dogs last year, but will almost assuredly have to best that number by a good deal to compete with Chestnut. Chestnut's record is 76 hot dogs eaten back in 2021 and the over/under at BetMGM for total hot dogs eaten by Chestnut at the 2025 event is 71.5, with the over juiced to -140. For comparison, Perlotti's over/under is only 50.5 hot dogs. Bettors can also wager on Chestnut (-2500) or the field (+900) to win the contest or an adjusted hot dog over/under of 76.5 for Chestnut (over +250, under -350). The winner of the contest receives $10,000 and the coveted mustard yellow belt.

2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his return

2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his return The 2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eatin...
Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93New Foto - Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93

The last surviving star from Detroit's greatest sports dynasty, Alex Delvecchio helped the Red Wings reach the pinnacle in the 1950s, struggled mightily as they hit bottom in the 1970s and segued into an elder statesman with a retired number, a bronze statue and ceremonial roles celebrating the franchise's renaissance in the 1990s. Always popular among fans, players and press, universally heralded as one of the NHL's 100 greatest players but always considered underrated by his peers, and a three-time Lady Byng winner on the ice but a lifelong Lady Byng winner off the ice, Delvecchio died Tuesday, July 1, surrounded by his family at age 93, the team announced. The team issueda statement from Delvecchio's family on Tuesday: "Alex was more than a Hockey icon, he was a devoted husband, loving father, grandfather, great grandfather, cherished friend, and respected teammate to so many. While the world knew him as an incredible hockey player with numerous accomplishments on the ice, we knew him as someone whose humility, strength, competitiveness, kindness and heart were even greater than his professional achievements. For decades, your love and support meant everything to Alex and to all of us. We are deeply grateful and thankful to everyone." Delvecchio's hockey story parallels the nearly 100-year story of the Red Wings franchise. Delvecchio's mentor played in the first game at the Old Red Barn on Grand River and Delvecchio's statue sparkles at the state-of-the-art arena on Woodward. He had ties to the earliest days of Detroit's franchise, when it was owned by a grain and shipping magnate, and he relished its rebirth as Hockeytown, when it was owned by a pizza baron. If not for Gordie Howe, his legendary linemate known as Mr. Hockey, Delvecchio could have been Mr. Red Wing: Only Howe played in Detroit longer than Delvecchio's 24 seasons. Only Steve Yzerman was a captain in Detroit longer than Delvecchio's 12 seasons. Only Nicklas Lidstrom played more games in a career spent with a single NHL franchise than Delvecchio's 1,550. And only Howe had more points in NHL history when Delvecchio retired in 1973. "When you think of the Red Wings, you think of Howe," future Hall of Fame center Phil Esposito told Sport magazine in 1971. "But Alex is the most underrated player in the game today — underrated by everyone but the players." Delvecchio was approaching his 40th birthday at the time. Late in the 1964-65 season, his 15th in the NHL, Delvecchio recorded a point in 17 consecutive games, a Red Wings record until Yzerman broke it 23 years later. "He's like a magician with the puck," goaltender Eddie Giacomin said during a Hall of Fame career. A left-handed shot, Delvecchio played on three Stanley Cup championship teams — all in his first four full seasons, all before he turned 24. As a rookie in 1951-52, when the Wings swept Toronto and Montreal in the playoffs for the Cup, Delvecchio centered the third line. In 1953-54, on a line with Howe and Ted Lindsay, Delvecchio's nine points tied Howe for the Wings' playoff scoring lead. In 1954-55, Delvecchio scored 15 points in 11 playoff games and the first and last goal in the Cup-clinching 3-1 victory over the Canadiens in Game 7. "I felt proud to be among so many players that were true stars of the game," Delvecchio said decades later. After 1955, the Wings wouldn't win another Stanley Cup for 42 years. A dynamic skater, a gifted passer and frequently the center on the second iteration of the Production Line with Howe and Lindsay, Delvecchio also was an ironman in the NHL's Original Six days. He never missed a game from age 25 until nearly 33. During a 12-year stretch, he played in 840 of 842 possible games. In 1956-57, his seventh season, a broken ankle sidelined him for 22 games; he then missed only 14 games the last 17 seasons of his career. "You don't get hurt in this game," he once told Sport magazine, "if you keep your head up and watch what's going on around you." In the 1950s and '60s, players also lived in fear that in a six-team league, with jobs scarce, every injury jeopardized their careers. "You just didn't want anybody to come in," Delvecchio said, "because you're gone if they shine." Unlike his Hall of Fame teammates from the 1950s — when the Wings finished atop the regular-season standings eight of nine years and won four Stanley Cups — Delvecchio wasn't banished in an ill-conceived trade (like Sid Abel in 1952, Terry Sawchuk in 1955, Lindsay in 1957, Red Kelly in 1960 and Marcel Pronovost in 1965) or given a do-nothing front office title (like Howe in 1971). In the early 1970s, Delvecchio turned down a lucrative offer to join Howe and his teenaged sons Mark and Marty with the Houston Aeros in the upstart World Hockey Association. "I'd spent my whole life with the Wings," Delvecchio explained, "and, what the heck, I'd better finish with them." "He was a pure Red Wing, for sure," said Jimmy Devellano, a Hall of Fame executive for the team. "Not only was he a great player, he never went anywhere else, and he managed and coached the team." Delvecchio did think he had been traded on Nov. 7, 1973, a few weeks before his 42nd birthday. A distraught Delvecchio, coming off a stellar 71-point season, planned to retire on the spot. And he did retire that evening — because general manager Ned Harkness asked him to coach the Wings. Delvecchio agreed to take over a 2-9-1 team about to lose its top playmaker, whose skills stood out as much as he did on the ice with his salt-and-pepper hair in an era without helmets. Harkness also cut Delvecchio's $125,000 salary. Delvecchio later would call it "the most terrible job of my career." He coached for parts of four seasons and was the general manager for most of three. A decade known by Wings fans as "Darkness with Harkness" turned even worse under Delvecchio's watch. The U.S.-based franchise with the most Stanley Cups was derided as the Dead Wings. After owner Bruce Norris fired Delvecchio and hired Lindsay in March 1977, Delvecchio was devastated, declared he was "ticked off" and decided "the hell with 'em." That was harsh talk from a respected, classy and even-keeled hockey figure who three times won and three other times nearly won the Lady Byng Trophy for sportsmanship and gentlemanly conduct. The bad blood faded when Little Caesars founder Mike Ilitch purchased the franchise for a pittance from Norris five years later. Delvecchio spent time in the broadcast booth in the 1980s (sometimes subbing for an ailing Abel). His number was retired in the 1990s (in a dual ceremony with Lindsay). His statue was unveiled in the 2000s (two days before Lindsay's). He was included in the festivities after teams captained by Yzerman or Lidstrom won four Stanley Cups (appearing with Howe and Lindsay). Delvecchio appreciated it all. When his No. 10 jersey was hung with Lindsay's No. 7 from the Joe Louis Arena rafters before roaring fans in 1991 — joining Howe's No. 9 retired in 1972 — Delvecchio declared: "I've been inducted into the Hall of Fame, I've won Stanley Cups, but this is better." This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press:Alex Delvecchio, Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93

Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93

Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93 The last surviving star from Detroit's greatest sports dynasty, ...
Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan dealNew Foto - Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan deal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he was not thinking of extending the July 9 deadline for countries to negotiate trade deals with the U.S., and continued to express doubt that an agreement could be reached with Japan. "We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington from a trip to Florida. Trump suggested he could impose a tariff of "30% or 35% or whatever the number is that we determine" on imports from Japan - well above the 24% tariff rate he announced on April 2 and then later paused. (Reporting by Andrea Shalal)

Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan deal

Trump says he won't extend July 9 trade deadline, expresses doubt on Japan deal WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump said on Tue...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com