What to Know About Trump's Gaza Ceasefire ProposalNew Foto - What to Know About Trump's Gaza Ceasefire Proposal

The sun sets behind destroyed buildings in Gaza on July 1, 2025. Credit - Jack Guez—AFP/Getty Images Israel is open to accepting a 60-day ceasefire, President Donald Trump announced Tuesday, urging Hamas to sign the deal that he said would pave the way for a potential "end" to the war in Gaza. Trump's announcement comes as he expects a visit from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House next week. Last week, the Presidentupped the pressureon Israel and Hamas to reach an agreement that would end the war in Gaza and release the remaining Israeli hostages. It's also come a day after one of thedeadliest days in Gaza, as Israeli attacks killed more than 70 people. More than 56,000 Palestinians and more than 1,700 Israelis have been killed over the course of the war that began when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Trump's shift infocus towards Gazafollows thetenuous ceasefirebrokeredbetween Israel and Iranin June after the U.S. joined Israel inbombing Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump may be hoping that, with a weakened Iran—one of Hamas' key allies in the region—Hamas may be pressured to accept the conditions of this ceasefire agreement. "My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War," Trumppostedon Truth Social on Tuesday evening. "I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE." Since thestart of its war with Iranin June, Israel alsointensified its campaignin Gaza.More than 100 people have been killedin Israeli attacks this week, which included astrike on a seaside cafethat killed a Palestinian photojournalist among others,strikes on a schoolthat was sheltering displaced Palestinians, andsoldiers firing on civilians seeking aidat thecontroversialU.S.- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Trump said that mediators Egypt and Qatar will deliver the final ceasefire proposal. The terms have not yet been publicly released, thoughreportssay it would involve Hamas releasing 10 living Israeli hostages and 18 deceased ones during the 60-day ceasefire period. There are an estimated 50 hostages still in Gaza, of whom Israel believes around half are dead. The remaining hostages would be released upon the agreement of a permanent ceasefire. Earlier Tuesday, Trump said Netanyahu "wants to" reach a ceasefire deal and teased that one would likely come next week. Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer met with Trump officials, including Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, Tuesday, and a senior Israeli officialtoldAxios that Dermer is prepared to begin indirect talks with Hamas concerning the deal. Trumprantedover the weekend about corruption proceedings against Netanyahu in Israel, calling it "a Witch Hunt," and Netanyahu's hearings this week were postponed on the basis of classified diplomatic and security reasons. Read More:Trump Tries to 'Save' Netanyahu as Israeli PM Faces Challenges at Home Talks between Israel and Hamas have been stymied by disagreement over whether a ceasefire should include an end to the war. Hamas says a ceasefire must include the end of the war and a full withdrawal of Israel's military from the Gaza Strip, which Israel has refused. Israel says it will only end its war in exchange for the dismantling and exile of Hamas, which Hamas has refused. An offer had already been on the table. Hamas hadreportedly offeredto release all hostages in exchange for a full withdrawal of Israel's military from Gaza and an end to the war. On Sunday, Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawireportedly saidNetanyahu insisted on a temporary agreement that releases only 10 hostages. Mardawi accused Netanyahu of setting "impossible conditions aimed at thwarting the possibility of reaching a ceasefire agreement and a deal on the hostages." Previous ceasefire proposals have only been agreed to by one side or have proved short-lived. In November 2023, six weeks after the outbreak of war, Israel and Hamasbegan an initial four-day ceasefire. Hamas returned 50 Israeli hostages in exchange for the release of 150 Palestinian women and children held in Israeli prisons. Israel said it would extend the truce for the release of 10 more captives per day, but Netanyahu said he did not want a permanent ceasefire until Israel achieved his aim of dismantling Hamas. Theceasefire collapsed a week laterin December 2023 after 110 hostages and 240 Palestinians were exchanged. Talks to extend the truce further failed as Israel refused Hamas' demand for all of theroughly 10,000 Palestinian prisoners, including 400 children, to be freed, and as Hamasrefused to releasecaptive women soldiers as part of its agreement to release all women and children held in Gaza. Also that month, the U.S.vetoed a United Nations Security Council proposalto stop the war, claiming that Hamas refused to accept a two-state solution, although Hamas' 2017 charterofficially acceptsone. Hamas at the time wasreviewing a three-stage ceasefire proposalby Arab, Israeli, and U.S. negotiators that involved the release of Israeli captives, opening up of aid, and return of dead Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Netanyahuultimately rejectedthe proposal after Hamas asked for Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza, the release of at least 1,500 Palestinian prisoners, and a four-and-a-half-month ceasefire in exchange for releasing all Israeli hostages. In March 2024, the UNSCpassed a ceasefire proposalwith 14 out of 15 members voting in favor. The U.S. abstained, after earlier in Februaryvetoing another ceasefire resolutionon the basis that it would impact talks between the U.S., Egypt, Israel, and Qatar. Later, the U.S. said the UNSC resolution was "non-binding." In May 2024, Hamas agreed to a three-stage ceasefire proposal from Egypt and Qatar that involved releasing all Israeli hostages in exchange for some number of Palestinian prisoners, increasing aid into Gaza, the gradual withdrawal of Israel from Gaza, and lifting Israel's siege on Gaza since 2007. Israel, however,rejected the proposal, insteadlaunching a new military offensivein the city of Rafah. Then-President Joe Biden alsolaid out a three-phase proposalat the end of May 2024 that would include the release of Israeli hostages and a "full and complete ceasefire." But shortly after Biden announced the proposal, Netanyahu saidIsrael would not end the war"until all of its goals are achieved," including "the elimination of Hamas' military and governmental capabilities." Netanyahu said in June that hewould only accept a "partial" dealthat returns Israeli hostages in return for pausing—but not ending—the war. In August, Netanyahureportedly supportedtheterms of a so-called "bridging" proposalmeant to meet in the middle of both sides' demands after talks in Doha negotiated by the U.S., Egypt, and Qatar. Hamas, however, rejected the plan, saying its terms, which were not officially made public, includedconditions that it could not agree to, such as Israel's refusal of a full ceasefire and military withdrawal from Gaza. Instead, Hamas called for Netanyahu to sign Biden's earlier proposal. On Jan. 19, 2025, Israel and Hamasbegan a three-phase ceasefireafterdelayed talksandIsraeli military escalation. But after the first phase had been achieved, theceasefire collapsed in Marchwhen Israel launched fresh airstrikes on Gaza before declaring that it was resuming the war. It's unclear whether Trump's proposal, which Hamas has not yet agreed to, will take hold or prove more lasting than prior efforts. But domestic and international pressure has mounted on the U.S., Israel, and Hamas to bring the war in Gaza to an end as it drags into its 21st month. Over the weekend, protesters in Israel called for a deal that would free the remaining hostages in Gaza. "There's a deal on the table,"saidEinav Zangauker, the mother of one of the hostages, at the rally. "What prevents it is Netanyahu's refusal to end the war." Trump allies have suggested it is entirely on Hamas now. "Take the deal, or face the consequences," former White House physician Rep. Ronny Jackson (R, Texas)postedon X. Whether those consequences could include U.S. involvement, as wasthe case with Iran, are unclear. Trump has on multiple occasionsduring his campaignandat the start of his second-term presidencyvowed that the militant group will have "hell to pay" if it does not release all the hostages. Hamas is generally positive about the proposal, but has conditions, Hamas sources told London-based news outlet Al-Sharq Al-Awsat. Those conditions include a demand to make it more difficult for Israel to resume the war if a permanent ceasefire is not achieved by the end of the 60 days such as through the gradual release of the 10 hostages, a source involved in the negotiationstoldtheTimes of Israel. Still, while Trump has asserted that Israel is on board with a ceasefire proposal, observers suggest that may indicate the terms are unlikely to be acceptable to Hamas. "If Netanyahu has agreed to another interim deal, it's almost certainly with language that doesn't commit him to end war," Middle East analyst and former U.S. diplomat Aaron David Millerpostedon X. "The main holdup today is exactly the same as it was last year: Israel's unwillingness to permanently end the war and Hamas's refusal to accept anything less,"addedforeign policy analyst and writer Daniel DePetris. "Unless Trump has found a way to crack those two irreconcilable positions, this is all theater." Contact usatletters@time.com.

What to Know About Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire Proposal

What to Know About Trump's Gaza Ceasefire Proposal The sun sets behind destroyed buildings in Gaza on July 1, 2025. Credit - Jack Guez—A...
Russia ramps up offensives on two fronts in Ukraine as both sides seek an advantage before fallNew Foto - Russia ramps up offensives on two fronts in Ukraine as both sides seek an advantage before fall

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — An emboldened Russia has ramped up military offensiveson two fronts in Ukraine, scattering Kyiv's precious reserve troops and threatening to expand the fighting to a new Ukrainian region as each side seeks an advantage before the fighting season wanes in the autumn. Moscow aims tomaximize its territorial gainsbefore seriouslyconsidering a full ceasefire, analysts and military commanders said. Ukraine wants to slow the Russian advance for as long as possible and extract heavy losses. Kremlin forces are steadily gaining ground in the strategic easternlogistics hub of Pokrovsk, the capture of which would hand them a major battlefield victory and bring them closer to acquiring the entireDonetsk region. The fighting there has also brought combat to the border of the neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time. In an effort to prevent Moscow from bolstering those positions in the east, Ukrainian forces are trying to pin down some of Russia's best and most battle-hardened troops hundreds of kilometers away,in the northeast Sumy region. "The best-case scenario for Ukraine," said Russian-British military historian Sergey Radchenko, "is that they're able to stall or stop the Russian advance" in the Ukrainian industrial heartlandknown as Donbas, which includes the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Then Ukraine could "use that as the basis for a ceasefire agreement." "There's a better chance for Russia to come to some kind of terms with Ukraine" in the fall when the Russians "see the extent of their offensive," Radchenko added. While the battles rage,Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyyis waiting to learn whether theTrumpadministration will support tougher sanctions against Russia and back a European idea to establish a "reassurance force" to deter Moscow. One setback camewith the U.S. decisionto halt some weapons shipments out of concern over the U.S.'s own depleted stockpiles. Ukraine faces relentless assaults in Sumy In the Sumy region, Ukrainian forces face a constant barrage of aerial glide bombs, drones and relentless assaults by small groups of Russian infantrymen. They endure the attacks to prevent Russian forces from being moved to other battlegrounds in the eastern Donetsk region. Ukrainian forces intensified their own attacks in Sumy in April and even conducted a small offensive intoRussia's neighboring Kursk regionto prevent up to 60,000 battle-hardened Russian forces from being moved to reinforce positions in the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, Ukraine's top army commander, Gen. Oleksandr Syrskyi, said last week. If those troops had been moved, they could have increased the tempo of Russian attacks across the front line and stretched Ukrainian forces thin. The strategy did not come without criticism. Commanders who were ordered to execute it complained that it resulted in unnecessary loss of life. Russian forces have penetrated up to 7 kilometersinto the northern Sumy regionfrom different directions along the border. Ukrainian forces are determined to keep them there to avoid freeing up Russian forces to fight in the east. So far they have succeeded, locking up to 10,000 Russian troops in the Glushkovsky district of the Kursk region alone, where Ukraine maintains a small presence after being mostly forced out by Russian and North Korean troops earlier in the year. Russia seeks maximum gains in Donetsk The war's largest battle is being waged in Donetsk as Russia inches toward its stated goal of capturing all of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Unable to tackle the strategically significant logistical hub of Pokrovsk directly, Russian forces are attempting to encircle the city, a maneuver that requires encroaching on the borders ofthe Dnipropetrovsk region. Bringing the war to a sixth Ukrainian region would be detrimental for Ukrainian morale and give Russia more leverage in negotiations if its forces manage to carve out a foothold there. Sabotage groups have crossed the border, only to be eliminated by Ukrainian forces. But in time, commanders fear that Russia will advance as Ukraine continues to grapple with severe shortages. Lack of soldiers and supplies across the 1,200-kilometer (745-mile) front line mean that Ukrainian forces must concentrate on holding their positions and conserving resources rather than advancing, said Oleksii Makhrinskyi, deputy commander of the Da Vinci Wolves battalion. Commanders describe battles so intense under drone-saturated skies that rotating forces in and out of position has become a deadly operation. Ukrainian forces remain in combat positions for several weeks at a time or more, relying on supplies carried in by drones. The Russians' goal "is just to enter Dnipropetrovsk region, to have a good position politically if the presidents negotiate peace," said Andrii Nazerenko, a commander of the 72nd Brigade, a drone unit in eastern Ukraine, referring topotential talksbetween Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. "They're really close to getting what they want," he said. All eyes on Trump's next move Zelenskyy hopes U.S. President Donald Trump will move away from his administration's past ambivalence toward Ukraine and signal his intention to continue American support, a move that could also alter Moscow's calculations. The two presidentsmet last week on the sidelines of a NATO summitand discussed a possible weapons package, including Patriot missile systems that Ukraine intends to purchase with European support. The U.S. Defense Department did not specify which weapons were being held back, when they disclosed the Pentagon review of U.S. weapons stockpiles Tuesday. Zelenskyy also hopes Trump will punish Russia by imposing harsher sanctions on its energy and banking sectors, which bankroll the Kremlin's war effort. Europe and the U.S. have imposed successive sanctions on Russia since the full-scale invasion in 2022, but Zelenskyy says those measures have not been enough to pierce Moscow's war machine. He has proposed a $30 per barrel price cap on Russian oil. EU sanctions envoy David O'Sullivan said Europe needs to maintain the sanctions pressure while also "holding out the prospect that if Russia behaves correctly, we could have some kind of ceasefire and some kind of sense of negotiation, but for the moment Russia doesn't seem to want that." Kyiv's closest European allies are also awaiting a sign from Trump that he will support a plan to deploy foreign troops in Ukraine to guard against future Russian aggression after a ceasefire agreement. That is likely the best security guarantee Ukraine can hope for in lieu of NATO membership. Meanwhile on the battlefield, Russian forces appear increasingly confident. Nazerenko noticed a shift in the morale of advancing Russian infantrymen in recent months. Instead of running away while being assailed by Ukrainian drones, they keep pushing forward. Nazerenko could not help but ask a Russian prisoner, "You know you will die. Why go?" Because, the Russian soldier replied, "we will win." ___ Associated Press journalist Volodymyr Yurchuk contributed to this report.

Russia ramps up offensives on two fronts in Ukraine as both sides seek an advantage before fall

Russia ramps up offensives on two fronts in Ukraine as both sides seek an advantage before fall KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — An emboldened Russia ha...
Diamondbacks ban fan who interfered with apparent would-be Giants HR for rest of season, citing 'multiple offenses'New Foto - Diamondbacks ban fan who interfered with apparent would-be Giants HR for rest of season, citing 'multiple offenses'

The Arizona Diamondbacks fanwho was ejected Mondayfor interfering with an apparent would-be San Francisco Giants home run has been banned for the rest of the season. TheDiamondbacks announced the banin a statement Tuesday, citing "multiple offenses" committed by the fan. "The particular fan has been involved in multiple offenses at Chase Field,"the statement reads. "Consequently we have terminated his Advantage Member account and he is prohibited from returning to Chase Field for the remainder of 2025. "This fan will have the opportunity to return to Chase Field in 2026 so long as he meets certain terms and abides by our fan code of conduct." The Diamondbacks did not identify the fan. He identified himself in an interview with Arizona Sports 98.7 FM on Tuesday. We won't publicize his name here, but he has, indeed, committed multiple offenses. His latest was during Monday's Diamondbacks-Giants game. With the Diamondbacks holding a 3-2 lead in the top of the eighth, Giants third baseman Christian Koss hit a deep fly ball to left-center field that appeared to be tracking over the wall for a game-tying solo home run. Instead, said Diamondbacks fan dove across three other fans and on top of the outfield wall to snag the ball with his glove. Umpires initially ruled this an out because of fan interference. After review, they called it a doubleThe fan was ejectedpic.twitter.com/FgAgLDmoaF — Jomboy Media (@JomboyMedia)July 1, 2025 Diamondbacks outfielder Tim Tawa made a play on the ball at the same time. But the ball appeared to be out of his reach and headed over the outfield wall if not for the fan's interference with the ball itself. Umpires initially ruled the play an out for fan interference. Upon review after a Giants challenge, they determined that the fan didn't make contact with Tawa and that Tawa couldn't have caught the ball. That led to the ball being ruled a ground-rule double on the basis that the ball was not tracking to carry over the wall. Instead of a game-tying solo home run or an out, umpires awarded Koss second base. He did not come around to score, and the Diamondbacks went on to a 4-2 win. The fan was ejected from the stadium. It's not clear exactly how many times this fan has interfered with baseball games from his outfield seat at Chase Field. Jomboy Media documented four instances in the past four seasons. This Diamondbacks fan has been involved in an umpire review in FOUR STRAIGHT seasonspic.twitter.com/wMCtKCAIqs — Jomboy Media (@JomboyMedia)July 1, 2025 The fan himself told 98.7 FM on Tuesday that he has caught 24 home run balls in his life and that doing so is "one of my things." His thing for the rest of the season will be watching Diamondbacks games from home.

Diamondbacks ban fan who interfered with apparent would-be Giants HR for rest of season, citing 'multiple offenses'

Diamondbacks ban fan who interfered with apparent would-be Giants HR for rest of season, citing 'multiple offenses' The Arizona Diam...
Washington Commanders new stadium: D.C. Mayor Bowser concerned about RFK dealNew Foto - Washington Commanders new stadium: D.C. Mayor Bowser concerned about RFK deal

While theWashington Commandershope to one day make the RFK Stadium site home again, it's the D.C. Council that is playing games on that famed plot of land. Nothing ever comes easy in politics, especially when the nation's capital is involved. The case involving the Commanders is no different as budget battles and political one-upmanship are on full display – setting up a fight between Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and the D.C. Council, with the team caught in between. On July 1, the mayor appeared onThe Team 980 with Kevin Sheehan, where she was asked about her feelings surrounding the deal, which has not yet been approved. "I'm concerned right now that everybody buckle down and get to work," Bowser said. "I'm not concerned about our deal. Our deal is solid. It pays off for D.C. And at the end of the day, I think everybody wants the same thing." Sheehan pushed Bowser to put her level of concern on a scale of zero to five, with five being the most concerned. "I would put my level of concern – because when you're a big city mayor you're concerned about everything – I'll put it at a four," Bowser said. The Commanders have been targeting a stadium opening date in 2030, allowing them enough time to host some big events in the future – notably games in the 2031 FIFA Women's World Cup. Without approval soon, the team claims those plans will be put in danger, forcing the D.C. area to miss out on those marquee dates. As illustrated in the currentdeal that was announced on April 28, the city would provide $1.1 billion in public funds to help build the stadium on the old RFK site. The Commanders would contribute $2.7 billion in what figures to be a nearly $4 billion project. Washington's team leadership held a dinner on Monday night for councilmembers to discuss the situation, which needs seven votes to approve.According to the Washington Post, there are currently four councilmembers in favor of the deal. There is currently aJuly 15 deadline in place as outlined in the exclusive negotiating window. With public hearings set for July 29 and 30, it appears the council is in no rush to move the legislation forward. More importantly, the council is slated to go on recess from August until mid-September, meaning no deal on the intended date could put the project in danger of falling apart. Fox 5 Washington DCreported on July 1 that Council Chairman Phil Mendelson has heard talks of a potential Plan B from the Commanders, which could include going to PresidentDonald Trumpand members of Congress to make the deal happen in time. This comes on the heels of a decision by Mendelson to separate the stadium deal from the 2026 budget process. ACommanders spokesperson released a statementin response to the news on June 25: TheWashington Commandersare committed to working with the Council around the clock to keep this project on schedule and deliver a world-class stadium for the District by 2030. This is about more than just a stadium: it's an investment in families, local workers, and long-term economic opportunity that will transform this community, District, and the region. Any substantive delays will jeopardize D.C.'s ability to attract premier concerts, global talent, and marquee events—including the 2031 FIFA Women's World Cup. Most importantly, it will slow new jobs at a time when the District needs them the most. We are hopeful the Council will continue to work in an expedited way to approve this deal and deliver a significant win for the people of D.C. Mendelson has indicated there will be no vote while the council is on recess, which could delay the project's fate until September or later. "It would be incredibly extraordinary to call the Council back in August,"Mendelson said, via NBC4 Washington. "I can't think of one time in 50 years of home rule that we have called the Council back." He also would not commit to a vote in early September. "I'm not gonna budge from this, and that is that we are working well with the Commanders and as diligently as possible to try to get to a point where the Council can vote as quickly as possible," Mendelson continued. The Commanders franchise left the RFK Stadium site in 1996 for FedEx Field in Landover, Maryland – where they still currently play home games at what is now known as Northwest Stadium. While there is no indication that the Commanders would leave and relocate to another city like other NFL teams have done when faced with similar issues from local officials, there is always a chance they could opt for another site in the surrounding area. Maryland, where the Commanders currently play, and Virginia have shown interest in a new stadium for the team in the past. For now, the goal remains focused on making the return to RFK a reality. All the NFL news on and off the field.Sign up for USA TODAY's 4th and Monday newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Commanders new stadium: Washington D.C. mayor concerned RFK site deal

Washington Commanders new stadium: D.C. Mayor Bowser concerned about RFK deal

Washington Commanders new stadium: D.C. Mayor Bowser concerned about RFK deal While theWashington Commandershope to one day make the RFK Sta...
Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's PowellNew Foto - Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's Powell

By Jasper Ward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has two or three top choices to replace Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chair. Powell, whose term ends in May 2026, was nominated by Trump to lead the U.S. central bank during his first administration. When asked abroad Air Force One whether he has a top choice to succeed Powell, Trump told reporters, "I have two or three top choices," but declined to provide further information. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Trump is considering former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett as replacements. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also being pitched as a potential candidate, according to the newspaper, which also listed former World Bank President David Malpass and Fed governor Christopher Waller as potential nominees. According to the Journal, Trump has toyed with the idea of selecting and announcing a replacement as early as September or October. However, Bessent told Bloomberg TV on Monday that the Trump administration is considering using the next expected Federal Reserve Board of Governors vacancy in early 2026 for appointing a successor. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has criticized Powell and other Fed governors for deciding not to lower interest rates, which are currently in the 4.25%-4.50% range. Fed chairs have long been seen as insulated from presidential dismissal for reasons other than malfeasance or misconduct, but Trump has threatened to test that legal premise with frequent threats to fire Powell. A Supreme Court ruling in May eased concerns that Trump could fire Powell as the justices called the Fed "a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity." (Reporting by Jasper Ward; Editing by Daniel Wallis)

Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's Powell

Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's Powell By Jasper Ward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Tru...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com