Republicans tee up House vote on Trump bill, outcome uncertainNew Foto - Republicans tee up House vote on Trump bill, outcome uncertain

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Republicans in the House of Representatives on Wednesday teed up a procedural vote on President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill that could reveal whether the party has enough support to pass it out of Congress. With only three votes to spare, it was not clear whether Republicans would be able to resolve the concerns of a handful of members who have threatened to vote against the legislation. A procedural vote was set for early afternoon, with a vote on final passage possible later in the day. That timetable could slip if House Speaker Mike Johnson is not able to secure enough votes to pass the measure. Republicans who control the House 220-212 have struggled to stay united in recent years, but they also have not defied Trump since he returned to the White House in January. The legislation contains most of Trump's top domestic priorities, from tax cuts to immigration enforcement, and he has urged lawmakers to get it to his desk to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Johnson has promised to meet that deadline. The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and substantial cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program. Similar divides exist in the House, which passed an earlier version of the bill in May that carried a lower price tag. The loudest objections come from hardline conservatives angry that it does not sufficiently cut spending. "What the Senate did was unconscionable," said Republican Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina, one of two hardliners who voted against the bill in an overnight committee hearing. Representative Chip Roy of Texas, who provided the other 'no' vote in committee, predicted the procedural vote would fall short. "As of right now, there aren't the votes," he said. TAX CUTS, IMMIGRATION CRACKDOWN The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut health and food safety net programs, fund Trump's immigration crackdown, and zero out many green-energy incentives. It also includes a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default on the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. Trump kept up the pressure on Wednesday. "Republicans, don't let the Radical Left Democrats push you around. We've got all the cards, and we are going to use them," Trump said in a social media post. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters on Tuesday, pledging that his party will use "all procedural and legislative options" to try to stop - or delay - passage. The bill includes more than $900 million in cuts to the Medicaid program for low-income Americans. Those cuts have also raised concerns among some House Republicans. But some House Republicans worried about social safety-net cuts could find solace in the Senate's last-minute decision to set aside more money for rural hospitals, funding Representative Nick Langworthy, a New York Republican, called "a lifeline that will be very helpful to districts like mine." Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, making it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline. (Reporting by Bo Erickson, Richard Cowan, David Morgan, additional reporting by Nandita Bose; Writing by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Scott Malone, Cynthia Osterman, Mark Porter and Chizu Nomiyama )

Republicans tee up House vote on Trump bill, outcome uncertain

Republicans tee up House vote on Trump bill, outcome uncertain WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Republicans in the House of Representatives on Wednesda...
Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza?New Foto - Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza?

It appeared on Wednesday that President Trump likely still has some deal-making to do before he can claim to have brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas to end the devastatingwar in Gaza. Mr.Trump saidin a Tuesday evening social media post that Israel had "agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize" a 60-day ceasefire, and he called on Hamas to accept the deal, warning the U.S.- and Israeli-designated terrorist group that "it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE." Israeli sources told CBS News on Wednesday that while there was strong backing in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet for the terms in the proposal, Israel was not committing to it yet, stressing that the government had voiced its backing to U.S. officials for a proposed framework for a ceasefire deal, not a final agreement. In a statement, Hamas credited mediators Qatar and Egypt for having "exerted intensive efforts to bridge the gap between the parties and reach a framework agreement that would pave the way for a serious round of negotiations." "We are approaching this with a high sense of responsibility and are conducting national consultations to discuss the proposals presented by the mediators," Hamas said, reiterating its long-standing calls for a truce that brings the war to an end, sees Israeli forces withdraw from Gaza, "and urgently delivers relief to our people in the Gaza Strip." Mr. Trump didn't offer any details of the proposed deal in his post on Tuesday evening, but he said that Qatar and Egypt — which have been key partners to the U.S. as it attempts to broker an agreement to end the nearly two-year war — would "deliver this final proposal." Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, in apost on social mediaWednesday, said there was "a great majority in the government and also among the people for a framework to release hostages. If there is an opportunity to do so — we must not miss it!" But that claim of cohesion may belie a potentially significant hurdle for Netanyahu as he prepares to head to Washington this weekend to meet with Mr.Trump, who's made it clear he wants to see a dealto end the war within days. Numerous Israeli media outlets reported Wednesday that one of the most far-right members of Netanyahu's cabinet, Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, had called on far-right nationalist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich to join him in blocking the government's approval of the ceasefire deal. Neither Smotrich nor Ben-Gvir confirmed any discussion about blocking the agreement, but in a short post on social media, Ben-Gvir said the war in Gaza should not end "a moment before defeating Hamas." Both men have been vocal in rejecting peace deals with Hamas, insisting that the group must be completely destroyed, not negotiated with. Yair Golan, leader of the Israeli opposition Democrats party, accused Smotrich and Ben-Gvir in a social media post of "leading a bloc to prevent the return of the hostages." He said they "do not deserve to sit around the government table. And whoever continues to allow them to sit there does not deserve to lead Israel for even one more day." While the real prospects of Israel and Hamas agreeing to a ceasefire in the short time frame that Mr. Trump is hoping for remained unclear, even the suggestion that peace could be looming may raise hopes for Gazans who risk their lives every day just to line up lining up for food. Gaza Humanitarian Foundation responds to criticism The Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health says at least 640 civilians have been shot to death in recent weeks trying to access desperately needed humanitarian supplies, including more than 400 at distribution sites run by the heavily criticized U.S.- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Since it began operating in the war-torn enclave on May 26, GHF has faced near daily claims of aid-seekers being killed by Israeli forces as they try to reach its four hubs in Gaza. Earlier this week, more than 170 humanitarian groups called for the opaquely run organization — which has never revealed its funding or management structure — to be disbanded and all aid efforts in Gaza to be reorganized under the long-established United Nations-led system. Those international humanitarian efforts have been largely blocked by Israel since March. The Israeli military says it works with the GHF to enable aid distribution without the risk of food and other goods being stolen by Hamas. The Trump administration has backed that reasoning and refused to support other means of food dispersal in Gaza, instead calling on other nations and institutions to work with the GHF, which replaced some 400 international aid distribution points in the Palestinian territory with just four of its hubs. Those hubs are run by armed U.S. private security contractors, and the Israeli military controls access to them. All established humanitarian agencies have refused to work with the GHF, saying it forces Palestinians to dislocate and trek for miles to reach its hubs and that it violates basic humanitarian principles, but the Trump administration announced late last week its first public support for the group: $30 million in funding. The State Department wouldn't say, when that funding was announced, if the funds had already been transferred to GHF, or which U.S. government account they would come from. The GHF has declined to respond to multiple questions from CBS News about its connections with the U.S. and Israeli governments and its funding, and it had, until this week, also declined to be interviewed by CBS News about its operations. On Tuesday, however, the GHF's director, American evangelical reverend Johnnie Moore, a former adviser to President Trump on religious matters, agreed to an interview via Zoom. Our first question was about the reports CBS News has received since GHF began its operations, directly from doctors and eyewitnesses, that Israeli soldiers have repeatedly opened fire on unarmed civilians trying to reach its aid hubs. "I do not want to diminish these reports, but we can't control what happens outside our distribution sites," Moore told CBS News. Asked how many more people would die before GHF changed the way it operates, Moore called the framing of the question "inappropriate," and said the group's "whole reason for existing is to give food to these people so they can live." He repeated his previous calls — and those of the White House — for the United Nations and its various humanitarian agencies to join GHF's efforts in Gaza. "We've said again and again to the U.N., to the WFP (World Food Program), join us in this effort," Moore said, before asking CBS News' correspondent, "with respect, why don't you join us? I'm asking you to help us run the operation if you think there is a better way to do this." Asked how GHF has been able to verify who exactly receives the aid it provides on the ground — which Moore has stressed does not reach Hamas — the reverend responded with a question: "Do you have anything positive to say about what we are doing?" "Do you think it is acceptable that people die every day trying to access aid? Is there not a better way to do this?" CBS News asked again. "We have made a decision that it is worth working in a war zone," Moore said, "as deadly as it is, because Gazans deserve food." Moore would not respond to questions about how GHF operates or who funds the organization, beside the $30 million contribution announced this week by the Trump administration. Extended interview: Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi speaks to CBS News after U.S. strikes Details from inside the courtroom as Sean "Diddy" Combs jury announced verdict Split verdict in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial | Special Report

Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza?

Is Trump really close to securing an Israel-Hamas ceasefire for Gaza? It appeared on Wednesday that President Trump likely still has some de...
Indiana Fever win WNBA Commissioner's Cup without injured Caitlin ClarkNew Foto - Indiana Fever win WNBA Commissioner's Cup without injured Caitlin Clark

Caitlin Clarkmight have been absent through injury but that didn't stop the Indiana Fever from winning theWNBACommissioner's Cup on Tuesday. The Fever beat the reigning champion Minnesota Lynx 74-59 with a brilliant performance at the Target Center, led by forward Natasha Howard who finished the night with 16 points, 12 rebounds, four assists and two steals. "You've got to have the confidence in yourself and the confidence in your teammates to allow someone else to step up in those moments, and I think that this group is learning that," Fever coach Stephanie White said after the win. WNBA superstar Clark sat courtside to watch her teammates battle it out in the final. The 23-year-old has been sidelined with a groin injury for the last three three games now, but the Fever looked impressive without their best player. "So proud," Clark wrote in anInstagram Story postalongside a series of pictures celebrating the title in the locker room. Howard spearheaded a balanced attack from the Fever, who had five players in double figures on the night and didn't let an early deficit hold them back. Despite racing into a 13-point lead early in the game, the Lynx began to struggle against the tough Fever defense. Minnesota ended the night with its worst offensive performance of the season, shooting just 4-of-16 from deep, way below its season average of 9.4 made three-pointers per game. Lynx All-Star Napheesa Collier was also kept relatively quiet on the night, managing just 12 points on 6-of-18 shooting to go with nine rebounds and three steals. "Phee's a great player, but my thing was, make her take hard shots, and that's what I did tonight," Commissioner's Cup final MVP Howard said. While 27-14 down in the second quarter, the game was looking to be getting away from the Fever but momentum quickly swung their way. The Fever ended the first half on an 18-0 run through a balanced team effort with Sophie Cunningham's hitting a pair of three-pointers in the process – the guard ended the night with 13 points. Indiana then held a 32-27 lead heading into the second half but didn't take its foot off the gas, opening up a double-digit lead with Howard getting into a rhythm. The Lynx – who own the league's best record at 14-2 – never really got close to retaking the lead after that, in what was their first home defeat of the season, though the final will not count towards the regular season standings. "We always want to play our best basketball," Minnesota forward Alanna Smith said after scoring 15 points. "So we have to take this game to heart and learn from the mistakes that we made in this game, the way we showed up, the way that we prepared, and just make sure that we don't do it again." For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Indiana Fever win WNBA Commissioner’s Cup without injured Caitlin Clark

Indiana Fever win WNBA Commissioner's Cup without injured Caitlin Clark Caitlin Clarkmight have been absent through injury but that didn...
Death of MLB's three true outcomes? Explaining why strikeouts are down in 2025New Foto - Death of MLB's three true outcomes? Explaining why strikeouts are down in 2025

WASHINGTON — There may never be another season in Major League Baseball like 2019, when there were more balls flying out of ballparks – and more swings and misses - than any time in the game's history. AndGleyber Torreswas one of the cool kids. In his first full season in the big leagues, Torres ripped 38 home runs in 138 games, a power output accompanied by 129 strikeouts. Never mind that Torres struck out 21.4% of the time: He was a two-time All-Star at 22, an MVP vote recipient, about to become shortstop of theNew York Yankeesand headed, by all appearances, towardsuperstardom. Yet even then, he knew something had to change. "I hit a lot of home runs," Torres, now a Detroit Tiger, tells USA TODAY Sports, "but I struck out a lot. From my first year in the big leagues, I had a lot of conversations with the hitting coaches there. They always tell me, 'Strike two, put the ball in play.' I worked on my (two-strike approach) every year. "Last year, in the second half, I had a really good approach, saw the ball very well. I really believe in my eyes to control the strike zone. I know how important it is some days to walk and put myself on base for the guy behind me. "So far, I really, really believe in my plan and go to home plate and do what I can do." He's not the only one. While strikeouts remain a scourge to the old school eye, it may be safe to declare that the era of bottomless whiffs is over. Major league teams are striking out 8.26 times per game, the lowest rate since 2017 and a 6% decrease from 2019. That season featured the highest K rate of all time (8.61 per team game) accompanied by the most home runs – 6,776 – in major league history. The offensive environment was an outlier for many reasons – including ajuiced baseball– but it also marks the symbolic apex of the game's "three true outcomes" era, when a home run, walk or strikeout ruled the sport, with three punchouts deemed the cost of doing business for one jog around the bases. Six years later, are we in the middle of a course correction? "It's in the process of swinging back," saysChicago Cubsmanager Craig Counsell. "I think we've given pitchers a ton of credit for improving. It was a conversation four or five years ago that (pitchers') velocity has improved. I think hitters now have calibrated themselves to that. "And training them better. That's improved contact. And probably stopped giving at-bats to people who can't make contact. So, decision-makers had to adjust a little bit, too." There's endless examples of both player and franchise realizing that selling out for power isn't necessarily in their best interests. Torres is a prime case: In 2018 and 2019, his first two seasons, he hit 24 and 38 home runs, with strikeout rates of 25.2 and 21.4%. By 2024, he was 27, about to hit the free agent market and struggling at the halfway point, with a .215/.294/.333 slash line and a 24% strikeout rate. Yet he managed to make myriad mid-season adjustments, all of which trimmed his K rate down to 17.2% and the results followed: A .298/.365/.421 second half and a stellar postseason, resulting in a one-year, $15 million deal with the Tigers. Come spring training, he continued tweaking his approach and embraced a greater dedication to game-planning, heeding the counsel of Tigers hitting coaches Michael Brdar, Lance Zawadski, and Keith Beauregard and, as Torres put it, "go to the plate with my plan and try to put a little more focus on whatever I do before the game." The approach has paid off: Torres has just 40 strikeouts in 311 plate appearances, a 12.9% strikeout rate well below the league average of 21.9%, and nearly half his whiff rate in his rookie season. And his offensive profile has never looked healthier: Torres is on track for 17 homers, two more than he hit his final season in New York, but he's headed toward career highs in OBP – his .386 mark is 39 points better than his previous best – and adjusted OPS (134). While Torres was a vaunted prospect and instant All-Star, curbing whiffs can be a matter of survival for others. "I hate striking out. Don't like striking out. I want to put the ball in play," says Baltimore Orioles slugger Ryan O'Hearn, who went from waiver claim to potential All-Star. "I want to make things happen. I want to make the other team make plays. I know what it's like to play against teams that don't strike out a whole lot, and it puts stress on the infielders. "Can't get any hits unless you put the ball in play, right?" Nor can you get off the bench. O'Hearn, 31, only once played more than 100 games in five seasons with Kansas City, striking out 99 times in 105 games in 2019. In December 2022, the Royals designated him for assignment, with a .293 career OBP and annual strikeout rates that ranged from 24.1% to 28%. The Orioles gave him new life, unlocking several mechanical cleanups that, he said, "helped me make contact more consistently. Less swing and miss in the zone. "Once I realized I could put in play a lot more consistently, it definitely became a conscious thing and I didn't want to strike out a lot." The results have been startling: O'Hearn hacked his K rate exactly in half from 28% in 2021 to 2023's 14%. This year, he's struck out just 46 times in 71 games and should win the All-Star Game fan balloting at designated hitter. It's well-deserved: O'Hearn is batting .295 with an .854 OPS (144 adjusted) and 11 homers. His newfound aversion to Ks is a big reason why. "Mentally, it's definitely changed a lot for me the past few years," he says. "I know it's a big league defense and there's really good defenders out there. But if you strike out, it's a lot easier to kill an inning, for a pitcher stroll through a game when a team strikes out a lot. Low stress on the defenders. "I don't want that. Even if it's 0-2, weak contact, I don't care. You might get a hit. You might get lucky." Power pays, and that will always be the case in the big leagues. TheLos Angeles Dodgersand New York Yankees are 1-2 in both home runs and OPS, befitting the coastal behemoths who handsomely compensate Shohei Ohtani and Aaron Judge, respectively. Yet the Yankees are fourth in strikeouts and the Dodgers rank 17th, a moderate vulnerability that can be greater exposed in a postseason environment. How, then, does a club generate an ideal concoction of power, patience and putting the ball in play? Ask the Arizona Diamondbacks. They are lurking just behind the Dodgers and Yankees with a .776 team OPS, and trail only the Dodgers and Chicago Cubs in runs scored. And they're fifth in home runs. But strikeouts? Just three teams whiff less often than Arizona, which has a 20.1% K rate; the Yankees rank 23rdat 23.1%. And the Diamondbacks hardly give up pop to get the ball in play: They rank eighth in hard-hit rate, with 42.3% of their balls at least 95 mph off the bat. It's no accident. Arizona manager Torey Lovullo says he and hitting coach Joe Mather are in alignment on their core offensive values: Putting the ball in play hard up the middle. Mather, Lovullo says, even keeps a running tab on how many balls reach their personal baseline of effectiveness: At least 90 mph on a line, with a launch angle between 5 and 25 degrees, equals success. "I'm tired of people just going out there and striking out," says Lovullo.  "It turned into a home run or strikeout league. I feel like if we get ahead of that and have an approach like the (David) Fletcher kid when he was in Anaheim, we'll be good. "Fletcher got no love in this game, and I'm like, every team needs three or four of those guys. If we can have three or four of those guys with some slug, we're going to put up some runs." Fletcher's career K rate was 9.5%, though he never managed to produce a league-average OPS over a full season. These D-backs don't have that problem. All-Star shortstop Geraldo Perdomo's strikeout rate has been vanishing a little more every year, now down to 11.7%. He pairs that with a .357 OBP and 115 adjusted OPS, along with such a strong situational feel that Lovullo says he can tell Perdomo, "I need at least a five-pitch at-bat here," and he will execute. "I've always had really good eyes and make contact with no power," says Perdomo. "As I get older, I think it's a reason I'm hitting the ball harder. I feel proud. I don't want to strike out, and the most important thing I can do is putting the ball in play, and now that I'm getting some power, I feel like I can just drive the ball with more intensity. "I'm not looking for a certain pitch, but if there's a good pitch that's close to me, I just try to drive the ball.'' While Arizona's pitching has dragged the club back toward the .500 mark, almost every contender has a contact fiend that tenderizes the opposing pitcher while also doing damage. For the Cubs, it is Nico Hoerner, who has just 22 strikeouts this season – a beyond elite 6.7% K percentage – while managing a .721 OPS despite just three home runs. He plays his role perfectly in the Cubs offense, haunting pitchers and defenses while enabling the lineup's aircraft carriers – Kyle Tucker, Seiya Suzuki and Michael Busch – to take their wallops. "He's got the perfect approach with runners in scoring position: There's gonna be contact," Counsell says of Hoerner, who's already amassed 3.3 WAR this season. "It's really hard to strike him out. It's his elite skill. "The ability to make contact is not an exciting trait as a hitter, but it's a valuable trait. It leads to runs getting scored." And while theTampa Bay Rayshave shaved just 2% off their team K rate year-over-year, the addition of rookies Jake Mangum (13.4%) and speed merchant Chandler Simpson (9.6%) have given them adynamic offensive attack. It's a decidedly postmodern look, one that might've seemed out of place in a pre-pandemic baseball world. And heck, it's not like the home run has vanished across the majors – the rate of 1.11 per team game is still 11th all-time. Perhaps what we're seeing is a generation of players realizing it's OK not to get too big at the plate, especially in an era where pitchers throw harder and nastier stuff with each subsequent season. And that the occasional shelving of the A swing can promote good habits and A+ outcomes for the team. "It's understanding who you are as a hitter and fortunately for us, I feel like we have a bunch of guys who understand their strengths when they walk up to the plate," says Rays manager Kevin Cash. "And right now, they're doing a good job putting that to use. "Today's pitchers and today's hitters are very special, very talented. And what they do to counter each other year-to-year, game-to-game, at-bat to at-bat – you're seeing a really good product on the field." Contributing: Bob Nightengale The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:MLB team strikeouts are way down. Why? Hitters, managers explain

Death of MLB's three true outcomes? Explaining why strikeouts are down in 2025

Death of MLB's three true outcomes? Explaining why strikeouts are down in 2025 WASHINGTON — There may never be another season in Major L...
Gov. Newsom signs housing legislation overhauling California's landmark environmental lawNew Foto - Gov. Newsom signs housing legislation overhauling California's landmark environmental law

California lawmakers have approved two new bills that are expected to lead to a significant overhaul of the state's landmark environmental protection law and jump-start the stagnated housing market that has long stymied residents and would-be employers. The major changes to theCalifornia Environmental Quality Act, known as CEQA, were attached to two bills in a larger $321 billion state budget bill that eventually passed with ease. California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the legislation on June 30, which received rare bipartisan support. "This is the most consequential housing reform in modern history in the state of California. Long overdue? Absolutely," Newsom said at a news conference as he signed the legislation. Supporters said the reforms to CEQA's strenuous review process will help improve the state's ongoing housing shortage and chronic homelessness crisis. Some environmental advocates call the move back-door dealmaking. Assembly Bill 130, created by California Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, exempts most urban housing projects from environmental review. Another bill, Senate Bill 131, by California state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, waives the environmental restrictions for other buildings, including health clinics, child care, and food banks. California has long been considered a national pioneer for environmental action, as changes to its signature impact review law come at a time that may change the landscape within the nation's most populous state. California is estimated to need3.5 million more housing unitsthan it has. The shortage is one reason people and businesses have fled as housing in popular cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles is unaffordable to the vast majority who want to live and work there. The changes are meant to jump-start housing construction, which has often been strangled by the use of the state's signature 1970 environmental law. Critics say the law is used by groups whose goal is more intent on stopping buildings than sparing the environment. The bills became law after Newsom threatened to reject the state budget passed last week unless there was anoverhaul of CEQA, which requires strict reviews of any new development built and its impact on the environment. That process could take months to years, adding expense and uncertainty to projects. For years, these environmental impact studies have often been known to delay and even halt new development due to CEQA, regarded as among the strictest laws of its kind in the United States. Duringa news conferenceafter signing the laws, Newsom said the matter was "too urgent, too important, to allow the process to unfold as it has for the last generation, invariably falling prey to all kinds of pratfall." Under the two new laws, nine types of projects are exempted from environmental impact reviews. They include child care centers, health clinics, food banks, as well as farmworker housing, broadband, wildfire prevention, water infrastructure, public parks or trails, and advanced manufacturing. "It's aligned with what I know about the history and the reform measures,"Mark Baldassare, survey director for thePublic Policy Institute of California, a nonpartisan research organization, told USA TODAY. "We'll see what takes place. Stay tuned." Possible changes have been under intense debate for at least a decade, Baldassare said. Newsom and other state legislators are now aware that voters nationwide during last year's elections blamed politicians, especially Democrats, for not curbing rising cost-of-living prices, Baldassare added. Baldassare said PPIC statewide polling of California voters in both2023andJune 2025revealed that the cost of living and affordable housing are their top two concerns, calling last year's election "a wake-up call." "The idea of reforming CEQA has been around for a long time," Baldassare said. "Our polling indicated that despite the state's strong environmental attributes, they were supportive of reforming CEQA across party lines, and that doesn't happen too often, especially given today's polarization." California budget breakdown:How it impacts your life, from Medi-Cal and education to fires The 54-year-old California statute, signed by then-governor Ronald Reagan, was intended to protect wildlife and natural resources of forests, mountains, and coastal spaces. The law requires state and local governments to study and publicize the likely environmental impact of any decisions they make, including the permitting of new housing, as California home values and rents are amongthe most expensive in the nation, according to the Public Policy Institute of California. The requirement is called an Environmental Impact Report, which can take up to a year to complete. Aiming to streamline and lower the cost of construction in California, the new laws also restrict legal challenges under CEQA by narrowing the documents courts can consider. It also allows limited environmental reviews of projects that are not considered to have a litany of impacts. California state Senator Scott Wiener,who wrote one of the two bills, told reporters on June 30 that the changes won't happen in the next year or three years, but in decades to come. He called the changes a bold step forward toward tackling the root causes of California's affordability crisis. "The high costs devastating our communities stem directly from our extreme shortage of housing, childcare, affordable healthcare, and so many of the other things families need to thrive," Wiener, a Democrat, said in a statement. "These bills get red tape and major process hurdles out of the way, allowing us to finally start addressing these shortages and securing an affordable California and a brighter future." Weiner added that when the economic conditions are right, the state will be prepared "to build a ton of housing," and the structure is in place to facilitate it. 'Connect people to shelter, housing':California Gov. Gavin Newsom unveils homelessness plan to clear street camps Asha Sharma, a state policy manager with Leadership Council for Justice and Accountability, described the changes as a "back-room, last-minute deal" that left the state budget hanging in the balance and the opposition little time for public scrutiny. "The bills were passed in the most undemocratic way possible. It made the entire state budget contingent on it," Sharma told USA TODAY. "We really couldn't make our voices heard. There was very little public process with this." She wasn't alone.Raquel Mason, a senior legislative manager with the California Environmental Justice Alliance, said her group opposes Weiner's bill. Sharma and Mason said there have been 23 Superfund sites in Santa Clara County, where tech-rich Silicon Valley is located. They saymany of those sites are tied to semiconductor manufacturing. "By advancing this bill, the legislature sent a clear message: our health, our safety, and our right to participate in decisions that impact our lives are disposable," Mason said in a statement to USA TODAY. "This bill will usher industrial development without any opportunity for our communities to advocate for needed mitigations to protect ourselves." While Weiner wrote a bill to exempt several types of projects from environmental review, Newsom forced the changes to overhaul the state's environmental law. The governor told lawmakers that he wouldn't approve California's $321 billion budget without them. Last week, a provision in the approved budget act said the spending plan would be repealed if changes to the state's environmental review process were not finalized by June 30. On June 30, Newsomsaid on social mediathat he enacted "the most game-changing housing reforms" in recent California history. "We're urgently embracing an abundance agenda by tearing down the barriers that have delayed new affordable housing and infrastructure for decades," Newsom wrote. The governor later mentioned to reporters during a June 30 news conference that his administration's goal is to build 2.5 million homes by 2030. Newsom said it's up to leaders across the state to use this new tool to help make the goal a reality. "If we can't address this issue, we're going to lose trust, and that's just the truth," Newsom said. "And so this is so much bigger in many ways than the issue itself. It is about the reputation of not just Sacramento and the legislative leadership and executive leadership, but the reputation of the state of California." Contributing: Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:California lawmakers roll back its landmark environmental impact law

Gov. Newsom signs housing legislation overhauling California's landmark environmental law

Gov. Newsom signs housing legislation overhauling California's landmark environmental law California lawmakers have approved two new bil...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com