Trump says US will start talks with China on TikTok deal this weekNew Foto - Trump says US will start talks with China on TikTok deal this week

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he will start talking to China on Monday or Tuesday about a possible TikTok deal. He said the United States "pretty much" has a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video app. "I think we're gonna start Monday or Tuesday...talking to China, perhaps President Xi or one of his representatives, but we would we pretty much have a deal," Trump told reporters on Air Force One. Last month, Trump extended to September 17 a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the U.S. assets of TikTok. A deal had been in the works this spring to spin off TikTok's U.S. operations into a new U.S.-based firm, majority-owned and operated by U.S. investors, but it was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump said the United States will probably have to get a deal approved by China. When asked how confident he was that China would agree to a deal, he said, "I'm not confident, but I think so. President Xi and I have a great relationship, and I think it's good for them. I think the deal is good for China and it's good for us." (Reporting by Jasper Ward and Andrea Shalal; Editing by Tom Hogue and Shri Navaratnam)

Trump says US will start talks with China on TikTok deal this week

Trump says US will start talks with China on TikTok deal this week ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Frida...
Denmark has long been Euroskeptic. Donald Trump helped change thatNew Foto - Denmark has long been Euroskeptic. Donald Trump helped change that

As Denmark takes over the presidency of the European Union, Danes are more strongly pro-European than at any time in the past two decades – a shift in sentiment that can at least partly be attributed to US President Donald Trump. An eye-opening survey published in March by Berlingske, a Danish daily newspaper, said 41% of Danes now see the United States as a threat. It also said 92% of respondents either "agree" or "mostly agree" that the Nordic nation needs to rely more on the European Union than the US for its security. Given the recent tensions between Washington and Copenhagen, those statistics may not be surprising. Since his return to the White House, Trump has spoken frequently and aggressively about Greenland, an autonomous crown dependency of Denmark, saying he would like the US to own it. Vice President JD Vance and members of the Trump family have made what many see as provocative trips to and statements about the world's largest island. After Vance's visit to the US military's Pituffik Space Base in Greenland in March, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen pushed back on his claim that Denmark isn't doing enough for defense in the Arctic, calling her country "a good and strong ally." Back in Trump's first administration, too, Greenland was a hot topic. In 2019, he reportedly accused Frederiksen of making a"nasty" and "absurd" statementin discussions about the island. Lykke Friis, a prominent Danish international affairs analyst and a former minister, told CNN that the country has experienced "a triple shock" that includes the war in Ukraine and the departure of the United Kingdom from the EU, known as Brexit. The biggest shock, however, has come in the form of Trump. "Now we have a different Denmark," she said. Speaking to CNN from Copenhagen, Marie Bjerre, the Danish minister for European affairs, conveyed a similar message – that the second Trump administration has changed Danish perspectives toward both the US and the European Union. "Things have dramatically changed in Denmark and our attitude toward Europe," she said, without mentioning the president's name directly. She was also very clear that Denmark feels a sense of disappointment in its longtime ally. Denmark would still like to have a strong relationship with the US, Bjerre said, "but in a situation where the US is closing itself more around itself… is threatening us with tariffs and also criticizing Europe, our freedom of expression and all sorts of other things. Of course, in that situation, we have to be stronger on our own." She added, "The world order, as we have known it since the Second World War, is changing and we have to deliver to that geopolitical new situation that we are standing in." The minister also referenced the historic ties and shared past experiences of both nations, expressing a degree of frustration, if not anger, about how that relationship has changed. "You could not put a paper in between the US and Denmark, we have always supported the US. We went into war with our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan… Seeing us, as a country, being criticized for not being a good ally, of course, that does affect our opinion," Bjerre said. Per capita, Denmark lost the second-highest number of soldiers of all the US-led coalition partners fighting in Afghanistan. In total, 43 Danish soldiers died, equating to 7.82 deaths per million citizens. The US, by comparison, lost 7.96 soldiers per million. "We used to be a very, very transatlantic country… that has plummeted," said Friis. "There is now the feeling… we simply cannot trust him," she said – the "him" being Trump. The shift in Danes' opinions coincides with Denmark taking up the rotating, six-month EU presidency. Historically, the southernmost Scandinavian nation has tended to be Euroskeptic, Friis told CNN, never feeling European at heart. She described it as sustaining a transactional relationship with Brussels, based on "pragmatic co-operation." Denmark has long worried about the EU wading into Danes' lives, fearing in particular for its relatively unregulated labor market. It has various opt-outs on EU policy, including not joining the EU's single currency, the euro. "We do things differently to other European nations," said Bjerre. Politicians and citizens used to fear that the EU "would become too dominating and too powerful," Friis said, but now "the fear is the complete opposite." Danes feel the bloc is "too weak" to deal with Putin to the East and Trump to the West, she said. Friis also described the prime minister's shift in tone as "huge," saying Frederiksen used to be "very skeptical towards the EU." In June, Frederiksen announced that Denmark was quitting the so-called "Frugal Four," an informal group of EU nations that had pushed to limit common spending, saying that "the most important thing is to rearm Europe." Laying out Denmark's priorities for the EU presidency later that month, she reiterated that view, saying: "Now more than ever Europe needs to step up and stand together. We have to build an even stronger Europe, a more secure Europe where we are able to protect our democracies." EU-commissioned, biannual polls show a clear trend of increased trust in the EU over the past two decades, rising from 46% in spring 2005 to 74% this past spring. Steeper increases can be seen during Trump's first term, after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and as Trump's second term began. The war in Ukraine has had a significant influence on Danish views on the EU, Friis said. "The very fact that you had a war in our backyard has sort of created a completely new sort of atmosphere around security in Denmark, people are worried. People are prepping now because they're scared about what could happen also to our own security," she said. Bjerre said Copenhagen's EU presidency would prioritize a "stronger Europe and a changing world," with Europe having a real focus on security. Denmark takes the European helm, then, at a time of increasingly pro-European sentiment among its own population and a wider recognition in Europe that it must do more to stand on its own. The problem is that some of Europe's most pressing issues – Ukraine, trade tariffs and security – mean talking to the US and Trump. And at the moment, there may not be much love lost between the two. Kayla Williams contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Denmark has long been Euroskeptic. Donald Trump helped change that

Denmark has long been Euroskeptic. Donald Trump helped change that As Denmark takes over the presidency of the European Union, Danes are mor...
Mariners' Cal Raleigh hits 34th and 35th home runs, eclipsing career high before MLB All-Star breakNew Foto - Mariners' Cal Raleigh hits 34th and 35th home runs, eclipsing career high before MLB All-Star break

Cal Raleighadded to his MLB home run lead, blasting his 34th and 35th of the season for theSeattle Marinersin a 6-0 win over thePittsburgh Pirateson Friday. Raleigh won the vote forthe American League's starting catcherin the MLB All-Star Game and joined the Home Run Derby field this week. And he maintained his lead over Aaron Judge, who also homered on Friday to reach 32 on the season. Perhaps most impressively, Raleigh has already matched his home run total for last season on July 4. The Mariners have eight games left to play before the All-Star break. Raleigh went deep in the first inning, reaching down and in for a 92 mphBailey Falterfastball. The homer was the hardest hit ball of Raleigh's career at 115.2 mph,according to MLB.com's Sarah Langs, and went 433 feet into T-Mobile Park's left-field seats. He followed that up in the sixth, taking Falter deep again on another fastball down and in. With his 35th homer, Raleigh matchedthe third-highest home run totalbefore the All-Star break. He also tied Mariners Hall of Famer Ken Griffey Jr. for the most in team history prior to MLB's midseason hiatus. HISTORY.With 35 home runs, Cal Raleigh ties Ken Griffey Jr. for the most in franchise history before the All-Star break.#TridentsUppic.twitter.com/1MP1E1Yx1o — Seattle Mariners (@Mariners)July 4, 2025 Only Barry Bonds (39), Chris Davis, Mark McGwire, Reggie Jackson and Luis Gonzalez (each with 37) have hit more by that point. And as mentioned, Raleigh can still add to that total in the next week. Raleigh's two home runs also gave him seven games this season in which he's hit multiple homers. Only four other players have achieved that feat before the All-Star break,according to Langs. Jackson has the most with eight. Two weeks ago, Raleigh hit his 29th homer, surpassing Johnny Bench's mark forthe most ever by a catcherbefore the All-Star break. With his 30th home run, he becamethe first switch-hitterto reach that total before the season's halfway point. Raleigh has hit 14 home runs as a right-handed batter this season, including both of Friday's blasts. He's hit 21 long balls from the left side. Raleigh's three RBI also gave him 74 for the season, tying theChicago Cubs'Seiya Suzukifor the MLB lead in that category. Additionally, his .650 slugging percentage and 1.030 OPS both rank second in MLB to Judge.

Mariners' Cal Raleigh hits 34th and 35th home runs, eclipsing career high before MLB All-Star break

Mariners' Cal Raleigh hits 34th and 35th home runs, eclipsing career high before MLB All-Star break Cal Raleighadded to his MLB home run...
Hot Dog Eating Contest prize money: How much did Nathan's champs win?New Foto - Hot Dog Eating Contest prize money: How much did Nathan's champs win?

Joey Chestnutgot more than the Mustard Belt for his victory at the2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest. He will pocket $10,000, as willwomen's champion Miki Sudo. For Chestnut, that worked out to be about $142 for each hot dog and bun he consumed, eating total of 70½ during the annual10-minute contestin Coney Island, New York. "It's awesome," said Chestnut, who returned to the competition after a one-year ban. "I'm really lucky. You know, competitive eating, it's not like people are buying tickets to watch it. And it's not tons and tons of advertising, so there's not the most money involved it in." Chestnut confirmed he makes exponentially from his three-year contract with Nathan's, although he has declined to reveal the terms of the deal. The competitors at Nathan's compete for a total of $40,000 in prize money, $20,000 for the men and $20,000 for the women. While $10,000 goes to each of the winners, the second-place finishers each get $5,000, the third-place finishers each get $2,500 apiece and the remaining $2,500 is split among other the fourth- and fifth-place finishers, according to George Shea, co-founder of Major League Eating and the host of the Nathan's contest. Winner: $10,000 Second place: $5,000 Third place: $2,500 Fourth place: $1,500 Fifth place: $1,000 The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Nathan's Hot Dog Contest prize money: What is purse for Joey Chestnut?

Hot Dog Eating Contest prize money: How much did Nathan's champs win?

Hot Dog Eating Contest prize money: How much did Nathan's champs win? Joey Chestnutgot more than the Mustard Belt for his victory at the...
Does the "big, beautiful bill" eliminate taxes on Social Security?

As Congress was approving President Trump's"big, beautiful bill"on Thursday, the Social Security Administration touted the legislation bystatingthat it "eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries." That claim, which echoesprevious promises by Mr. Trumpto remove taxes on Social Security, may have come as welcome news for the millions of older and disabled people who depend on the program for income. So does the bill deliver? Not entirely. In apress release, SSA said that the tax and spending package, which the president is set to sign into law on Friday, "ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits." That figure draws on a Juneanalysisby the White House's Council of Economic Advisers that said 88% of seniors — or 51.4 million people — on Social Security will pay no tax on their payments under the measure because their deductions would exceed their taxable benefits. The bill "includes the largest tax break in American history for our nation's seniors," CEA said, adding that "the deductions ensure that seniors who earned their Social Security through years of hard work get more money back in their pockets." Yet while it's true that the bill offers fresh tax relief for some people on Social Security, it is misleading to suggest that the measure does away with taxes on Social Security benefits, policy experts told CBS MoneyWatch. Rather, the bill offers relief by creating a new "bonus" tax deduction for beneficiaries. "While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits," Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C., think tank, told The Associated Press this week ahead of Congress approving the bill. The Social Security Administration did not respond to a request for comment. The White House declined to comment. How does the "big, beautiful bill" impact Social Security? The bill doesn't eliminate taxes on Social Security, but rather introduces a temporary deduction that beneficiaries can claim to lower their federal income tax. Notably, that deduction applies to all of a senior's income — not just to Social Security benefits. Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D.C., told CBS MoneyWatch the bill doesn't change the taxation of Social Security benefits. Eliminating taxes on Social Security under the bill was impossible because of a congressional restriction (dubbed theByrd Ruleafter late West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd) that limits what the Senate can include in a reconciliation bill like the Republican budget measure. What the bill does do is provide a temporary tax deduction of up to $6,000 for seniors aged 65 and older. The tax break is available to people with an adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less and $150,000 or less for couples filing jointly. The deduction is set to expire at the end of 2028. "Each spouse can take the deduction, for a total of $12,000, if both are 65-plus," AARP explains in itsanalysisof the budget bill. The deduction phases out for people who earn above those amounts. Social Security recipients under 65 and people above the specified income thresholds are ineligible to claim the new tax deduction. It also won't benefit the many low-income seniors who already pay no federal income tax because they earn too little. "Boosting the amount that you get to write off when you already get to write off everything does not help you at all," Kogan said. The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan policy research group, said in a Junereportthat exempting Social Security benefits from taxation would not change the after-tax income for the bottom 20% of taxpayers, noting that "those taxpayers are already exempt from taxation on their Social Security benefits." The biggest beneficiaries of the bill will be higher-income seniors, said Martha Shedden, president and co-founder of the National Association of Registered Social Security Analysts, which focuses on Social Security education. "The people who benefit by definition have to be richer, and people who benefit the most are the richest people," Kogan added. More pressure on Social Security? Providing a temporary tax deduction is likely to help some Social Security recipients, but it could also worsen the retirement program's fragile financial state, Kogan said. Social Security is on track todeplete its trust fund by 2034if Congress does not take action. "We already have a problem of not enough money going into the trust fund. This bill makes even less money go into the trust fund," he said. The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a University of Pennsylvania think tank that studies fiscal issues,estimatesthat eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits would lower federal revenue by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase the federal debt by 7%  by 2054. As the debate continues over how to shore up Social Security while offering tax relief to older Americans, one thing is clear, and perhaps politically unpalatable: cutting benefits. According to a AARP-fundedsurveyfrom the National Academy of Social Insurance released in January, 85% of Americans think benefits should not be reduced, or that they should be increased, even if it means raising taxes on some or all Americans. "Virtually all Americans want their Social Security benefits to be preserved and are willing to do what it takes to ensure the program continues to provide meaningful support for future generations," said AARP Chief Public Policy Officer Deb Whitman in a statement after the survey was released. Several people missing from Texas summer camp amid deadly flooding, officials say What a new DOJ memo could mean for naturalized U.S. citizens July 4 holiday week expected to set record for travelers

Does the "big, beautiful bill" eliminate taxes on Social Security?

Does the "big, beautiful bill" eliminate taxes on Social Security? As Congress was approving President Trump's"big, beaut...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com