Democrats going after Trump's megabill tell their own stories of needing Medicaid and other aid programsNew Foto - Democrats going after Trump's megabill tell their own stories of needing Medicaid and other aid programs

As Democrats rush to define President Donald Trump's domestic policy and immigration law, a handful of liberal candidates are relying on their personal experiences with programs facing key cuts to highlight the broad scope of the legislation and target Republicans who voted for it. Randy Villegas, who is challenging California Republican Rep. David Valadao in a district with one of the country's highest concentrations of Medicaid recipients, said that the program covered his mother's prenatal care when he was born. Arizona's JoAnna Mendoza credits government assistance programs for allowing her to serve her country as a Marine. And one district over from Mendoza, 25-year-old first-time candidate Deja Foxx leads with her backstory as the daughter of a single mom to distinguish herself ahead of a July 15 Democratic primary. "I have lived the policies people in DC debate," Foxx told CNN in an interview. "I have a different sense of understanding and urgency." For Democrats, tapping into the personal stories of people impacted by policies they oppose is a familiar strategy. They're hoping to make Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" a political albatross for the GOP by challenging the Republican argument that those affected by cuts are either refusing to work, committing fraud or living in the US without authorization. Mendoza, who is running against two-term Republican Rep. Juan Ciscomani, said government aid was critical for her parents, both farmworkers. "I think what pisses me off the most and what really upsets me is that there is this sentiment that somehow people want to be on these programs," she told CNN. "I know for a fact how devastated and how embarrassed my parents must have felt having to go in and ask for assistance because they couldn't provide for their family. I think about that now as a parent." She said her campaign has started holding listening sessions in the district to contrast with Ciscomani, who she argued has not made himself accessible to constituents. Ciscomani's office did not respond to requests for comment. In response to protests calling on him to hold more town halls earlier this year, the congressman told a local news outlet KGUN9 in April that he has attended events in the district and held a telephone town hall. During the 2024 presidential campaign, Democrats leaned on reproductive rights storytellers who shared their experiences of receiving delayed treatment for miscarriages or unviable pregnancies to highlight the impact of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision. The strategy helped highlight the issue, but the economy ultimately far outweighed abortion when it came to the issues that mattered most to how people voted for president – 32% to 14% – according to CNN exit polls. As Democrats seek to reverse Trump's gains with working-class voters, they have emphasized that the bill's reductions in social safety net programs helped fund the extension of tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy. "We need a strong economic populist message that says these billionaires don't give a shit about you," Villegas said. Meanwhile, Republicans are also rushing to frame how Americans perceive the new law. The House GOP's campaign arm said in a memo released after final passage that they had voted to provide border security funding, prevent a tax hike and "crack down on welfare fraud and restore integrity to Medicaid." "Today, (Democrats) handed Republicans a weapon to cement the party's image as out of touch with hardworking Americans: Democrats are not fighting for them," the National Republican Congressional Committee memo reads Only one House Republican in a competitive district voted against the bill: Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania. GOP lawmakers have argued the changes will help sustain the programs for those who need them most and say it will only push able-bodied adults back into the workforce. Democrats and health policy experts, however, warn that the requirements will primarily kick off people who qualify for the benefits but struggle to frequently verify their eligibility. An estimated 11.8 million people could lose access to Medicaid coverage under the new law over the next decade, according to an analysis by health care policy site KFF, primarily due to new work requirements for some adults and the repeal of Biden administration rules that simplified eligibility screenings. The work requirement mandates people who don't qualify for exemptions work or volunteer 80 hours a month. The legislation also puts new work requirements on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the formal name for food stamps, on parents with children older than seven and adults ages 55-64. Those rules, as well as provisions that require states to share more of the program's cost, could put assistance for millions at risk. "Republicans don't typically run for office defending entitlement programs," said Rob Stutzman, a California-based Republican strategist. "I think it's a tough central message for any candidate." Now that the bill has been signed into law, Stutzman said Republicans have an opportunity both highlight popular provisions in the bill, such a provision allowing workers to deduct up to $25,000 in tips from their taxes, and frame the Medicaid changes as a return to pre-Biden era policy. In California, specifically, Republicans can point to state leaderscutting Medicaid benefits for undocumented migrantsin a recent budget. "If I'm a Republican candidate, I'm saying 'Great, that program still exists for your parents, because your parents were able-bodied and working," Stutzman said. "We want to make sure that this program is being applied to people like your parents and not people that are not seeking work in order to maintain this health care benefit." Democrats, however, argue that it's working people who will fall through the cracks under the new requirements. Noah Widmann, a candidate in Florida's 7th Congressional District, is running against GOP Rep. Cory Mills. Widmann has talked about benefitting from both food stamps and Medicaid growing up and described work requirements as "red tape that make it tough for people that are eligible" to get care. "At the end of the day – even if it happens to one family – if one family is having their health care and their food ripped away from them, it's wrong," he said. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Democrats going after Trump’s megabill tell their own stories of needing Medicaid and other aid programs

Democrats going after Trump's megabill tell their own stories of needing Medicaid and other aid programs As Democrats rush to define Pre...
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political costNew Foto - Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama had theAffordable Care Act. Joe Biden had theInflation Reduction Act.President Donald Trumpwill have thetax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. InDonald Trump's case,the tax cuts may almost become lostin the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forcednearly all congressional Republicansto line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labeling the legislation the "One Big, Beautiful Bill" — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. ButTrump's victorywill soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections whereDemocrats plan to runon a durable theme: that the Republican president favors the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it.Nonpartisan analysts, however, projectsignificant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favoring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs "won't be affected." "The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors," said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. "I think that's going to be the big impact." Hard to reap the rewards Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. "I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it," said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Social net setbacks Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would "love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid." "We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something," Trump said. "But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better." That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. "In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different," said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. "Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food." Some unhappy Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted "Obamacare." With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. "If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts," Tillis said. "The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey." Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they "hated Trump." That didn't bother him, he said, "because I hate them, too." ___ Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama had theAffordable Care A...
Former NFL LB Bryan Braman 'in the fight of his life' as he battles rare form of cancerNew Foto - Former NFL LB Bryan Braman 'in the fight of his life' as he battles rare form of cancer

Bryan Braman, a former linebacker for the Houston Texans and Philadelphia Eagles, is currently battling a rare, aggressive form of cancer, his agenttold KPRC 2 in Houston. "At Stellato Sports, Bryan Braham has always stood for strength, resilience and leadership," said Sean Stellato. "He is a pillar and a staple of the underdog. Now, in the face of cancer, he embodies those qualities more than ever. If there is one person that I know that can beat cancer, it is Bryan Braman, who I have always considered family. He's in the fight of his life. Please support Bryan and keep him in your prayers." The 38-year-old Braman has undergone multiple surgeries and recently underwent a CAR T-cell reprogramming treatment program in Seattle, according to aGoFundMe set upto help the former NFLer. "With the cancer that Bryan has, which is a VERY rare form of cancer, the Car-t treatment had the highest chance of success as the cells are reprogrammed to fight this cancer that is within Bryan. His cells did re-infuse themselves, and did in fact start reproducing within his bone marrow. At first the mass did start to shrink, but then the cancer started fighting back. At this point Bryan has had to start having chemo treatments that are designed for the treatment program Bryan is in. "Bryan has had to undergo several surgical procedures. The main problem has been that Bryan has not been able to recover from the procedures because of his lowered immunity due to all of these treatments. By the time he was able to recover so he could continue with the chemo, the cancer has grown [exponentially] faster, and is is now growing around his vital organs. "The Dr's are now concerned because of his treatment, his chemo options are very limited. They have tried all of the various treatment options, and unfortunately, none of them are working against this cancer. But Bryan has not given up. He is looking into other trial treatment programs, and is determined to never give up." As of Saturday morning, nearly $55,000 has been raised for Braman, who was diagnosed in February. Braman grew up in Spokane, Washington, and was undrafted out of West Texas A&M. He ended up making the Texans' roster on special teams in 2011 and made his name known witha helmet-less tackle. One year later he was an alternate for the Pro Bowl. Braman moved on to the Eagles in 2014 for three seasons. After an injury cut short his time with the New Orleans Saints in 2017, he returned to the Eagles that December and helped them win Super Bowl LII over the New England Patriots.

Former NFL LB Bryan Braman 'in the fight of his life' as he battles rare form of cancer

Former NFL LB Bryan Braman 'in the fight of his life' as he battles rare form of cancer Bryan Braman, a former linebacker for the Ho...
Verstappen bests his F1 title rivals Piastri and Norris for British GP poleNew Foto - Verstappen bests his F1 title rivals Piastri and Norris for British GP pole

SILVERSTONE, England (AP) — Formula 1's hot topic is where Max Verstappenmight gonext season. There was no doubt about where he belonged on the grid as he snatched pole position for the British Grand Prix. As his title rivals from McLaren made small but costly errors, Verstappen had the pace when it mattered most on Saturday. He sacrificed grip for speed and went fastest by 0.103 of a second to beat Oscar Piastri's time. Lando Norris was third, .015 further back, as hisfans in the new "Landostand"saw a setback to his chances of a first home win. Ferrari's Lewis Hamilton, a record nine-time winner of his home race, was also in the fight for pole but had to settle for fifth after a relatively slow end to his lap. With George Russell fourth for Mercedes, that made three British drivers in the top five, but none on the front row. Piastri lost time with a slight slide in the last corner on his final run, while Norris clipped a curb on an otherwise strong lap. Verstappen had seemed pessimistic about having the pace to challenge the McLarens at Silverstone — Ferrari had been closer than Red Bull in practice — and he described his car as "so difficult" over the radio partway through the session. Even so, he found the pace for pole. A crucial change After Verstappen was frustrated with his car in practice, Red Bull tweaked the setup for higher straight-line speed, at the cost of some grip, especially in Silverstone's many high-speed corners. "It seemed to hold on," was Verstappen's verdict. In Sunday's race, that could make it trickier for the McLarens to get close enough to try and overtake. Even with the DRS overtaking aid, Norris said the McLarens might be able to match Verstappen's higher top speed only on the straights, not reel him in. Piastri said the conditions reminded him of qualifying at the Japanese GP in April, when Verstappen took pole. Hekept both McLarens behind himin the race for his first win of 2025. Piastri has a 15-point lead over Norris, while Verstappen was third, 61 points off the lead. Tsunoda struggles in other Red Bull Amid speculation over Verstappen's future, there was another sign ofhow much Red Bull relieson the four-time world champion as his teammate Yuki Tsunoda missed the top 10 for the sixth straight qualifying session. Tsunoda placed 12th and on Sunday will seek to end a run of four races without scoring a point. Mercedes rookie Kimi Antonelli qualified seventh but has a three-place penalty for crashing into Verstappen on the opening lap of theAustrian GPlast week, dealing a heavy blow to Verstappen's title challenge. Haas rookie Oliver Bearman had impressive pace to qualify eighth. It meant little because he already had a 10-place penalty after hecrashedin the pits after speeding under a red flag in practice. Franco Colapinto is under pressure with no points this season at Alpine and did himself no favors on Saturday by qualifying last with a spin and slide into the barriers which brought out the red flag. ___ AP auto racing:https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing

Verstappen bests his F1 title rivals Piastri and Norris for British GP pole

Verstappen bests his F1 title rivals Piastri and Norris for British GP pole SILVERSTONE, England (AP) — Formula 1's hot topic is where M...
Megabill negotiations show Vance is a key player in the Trump administrationNew Foto - Megabill negotiations show Vance is a key player in the Trump administration

Over the past six months, Vice President JD Vance has shown how much of a key player he has become in the Trump administration, serving as the president's most prominent advocate and advancing his agenda. The latest example came this week, when Vance helped push President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill through Congress. Vance held a series of meetings with conservative and moderate holdouts and Senate leadership last Saturday to help move the bill forward. A source with direct knowledge stated that Vance played a key role in talking with Senate holdouts throughout the bill before he ended up casting several tie-breaking votes as president of the Senate and move the spending bill along to the House. Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski,who had been critical of the bill's cuts to Medicaid and SNAP -- the food assistance program --met with Vance, where he thanked her for being a team player despite her concerns with the legislation, just before she voted for the bill. During the sprint to push the bill through, Vance was criticized for hissocial postaround concerns of the bill's impact on Medicaid, writing that "the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions." During all this, Vance was making phone calls to Trump and the two were updating each other on their talks with senators ahead of the bill's passage. The vice president attended Wednesday's meeting at the White House between Trump and several holdouts from the House as the president ramped up the pressure to vote for the bill. North Carolina GOP Rep. Greg Murphy, who had told reporters on Wednesday night that he was still undecided because of some of the health care provisions, said Thursday that he ultimately decided to support the package after speaking on the phone to Vance and the president. "I needed assurances," he said. A source close to Vance said that he continued to work the phones ahead of the floor vote on the rule, calling multiple House GOP holdouts to make the administration's case for them to support the bill. However, it's not just on the domestic policy front that Vance is having an impact. He has also been critical in supporting Trump's foreign policy. MORE: Holdouts say Trump promised he'd 'make the bill better' in the future While Trump was weighing the decision to strike Iran's nuclear sites, Vance came to the president's defense after supporters like Tucker Carlson and those in the MAGA base were outspoken against the U.S. getting involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. "He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president," Vance wrote on X. "And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus." Vance's comments were a departure from his prior statements that the U.S. should not get entangled in foreign conflicts. A prime example is the vice president's opposition to the U.S. providing more aid to Ukraine. "I gotta be honest with you, I don't really care what happens to Ukraine one way or another," Vance said in February 2022, amid an explosion of bipartisan support for the country following the aftermath of Russia's invasion. Most recently,Vance expressed concernsabout the president's decision to strike the Houthis in Yemen in a Signal group chat with other top administration officials. "I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now," Vance wrote in the chat. "There's a further risk that we see a moderate to severe spike in oil prices. I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc." In the lead-up to the strikes, Trump was trying to engage the MAGA base with Vance to see what their reaction would be if he ordered the bombing. Prior to the strikes, Trump told reporters on Air Force One while flying back from the G7 summit in Canada that it was possible he could send Vance and special envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with Iranian negotiators. Vance's active role in moving Trump's agenda forward was always part of the plan. In November, following the election,a source close to the vice president told ABC Newsthat Vance had been tasked to ensure that all of the priorities of the Trump administration move forward and would work on any of the issues Trump needed him to further, signaling that the vice president would not be assigned one specific issue to work on, but would be involved in several policy issues. It was also expected that Vance would be Trump's "eyes and ears" in the Senate to ensure that his agenda moves forward, the source also said. It's familiar territory for Vance, who was elected to the Senate in 2022. All this comes as Vance is viewed by some as the MAGA heir apparent to Trump ahead of the 2028 election. At the same time, he is working to raise as much money as possible for Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterms as chair of the Republican National Committee -- the first time a vice president has ever held the role. Joel Goldstein, a vice-presidential scholar and former professor at Saint Louis University Law School, told ABC News that Vance is working in a different timeline compared to his predecessors, as he will serve only one term as vice president under Trump. "Every vice presidency is different and one of the things that is unique about Vance's is that every other vice president, you know, with the possible exception of Harris, entered office with the expectation that the president was going to run for reelection," Goldstein said. "I think he's in a very unique position in that his first term as vice president is his last, and so his presidential ambitions, the time for reckoning comes up, you know, much quicker than is normally the case." Following his tie-breaking votes in the Senate, several Democrats who might be opponents in the 2028 presidential election attempted to make Vance the face of Trump's spending bill. In a post on X, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg called out Vance for casting the tie-breaking vote to allow the bill to move forward. "VP Vance has cast the deciding vote in the Senate to cut Medicaid, take away food assistance, blow up the deficit, and add tax breaks for the wealthiest," Buttigieg wrote. "This bill is unpopular because it is wrong," he continued. California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsomtold Americans on Xto "bookmark" this moment, writing that "JD Vance is the ultimate reason why 17 million Americans will lose their healthcare." In an interview with NBC News, Trump pointed to Vance and Secretary of State and interim national security adviser Marco Rubio as possible successors, and said, when asked, that he believes his MAGA movement can survive without him. Asked about the president's comments, Vance said that if he does end up running for president, he's "not entitled to it."

Megabill negotiations show Vance is a key player in the Trump administration

Megabill negotiations show Vance is a key player in the Trump administration Over the past six months, Vice President JD Vance has shown how...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com