Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recessNew Foto - Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess

The Jeffrey Epstein files saga at times all but ground Capitol Hill to a halt last month — driving a wedge between Republicans in the House as Democrats went on offense to pressPresident Donald Trump's Justice Department to release more investigative material. But since returning to their districts for summer recess, lawmakers aren't hearing much about Epstein at public town hall meetings they've hosted so far. The debate that's dominated Washington in recent weeks didn't come up at all in some town halls Republican and Democratic House members have held — includinga raucous event Thursdayhosted by Wisconsin GOP Rep. Bryan Steil and two more mild-mannered affairs held by Wyoming Republican Rep. Harriet Hageman. During others, it's been the topic of just one or two questions. In Wisconsin on Thursday, Rep. Mark Pocan — a Democrat who hosted a town hall in Prairie du Chien, in neighboring Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden's district — brought up Epstein himself, as part of a response to a question about whether Trump might declare martial law and cancel elections. "It's a step too far to say you're going to release something and then say, 'No, there's nothing there to look at,'" he said. Only one questioner raised the topic of Epstein — and she did so to call it a distraction. Pocan kept his comments focused largely on theRepublican tax and cuts spending billthat Trump signed into law on July Fourth — repeatedly warning that cuts to Medicaid could gut Wisconsin's public health insurance programs and force the state to spend tax dollars filling holes left by the federal government. The Democratic congressman said afterward that's why he mostly avoided talking about Epstein. "I keep it to economics. I'm an economic, progressive populist. I think that's how most people make decisions when they go to elections. That's how Donald Trump won the election. That's why Donald Trump's doing poor in the polls," he said. The woman who'd brought up Epstein, Krista Brown, a 38-year-old stay-at-home mother from Viroqua, said she has bigger concerns than Epstein — such as whether steep cuts in staffing at the Department of Education will delay action on a Title IX complaint she'd submitted on behalf of her children, or whether National Weather Service offices will be staffed. "It has more to do with the things that people need as a foundation than it does about arguing over things that the administration wants us to spend our oxygen on. I'm just not interested in that," Brown said. "When you live rural, you care about who's going to plow your goddamn roads — when it's going to get plowed, if the buses can get through, how cold it is, if the weather's going to be reported," she said. "That's what matters. And the rest is just going to float away, because pretty soon it's going to get so hard in real life that there's not even going to be time to talk about that." The relative lack of focus on Epstein at town halls reflects the broader priorities of Americans. Arecent CNN pollconducted by SSRS found that the economy and immigration-related concerns are the issues Americans consider most important. The poll also found increased Democratic attention to government spending, concerns about separation of powers and the rule of law, and Trump himself. The amount of information the federal government has released on the Epstein case was an issue that didn't rise to prominence, with just one respondent mentioning it as the most important problem. Still, even if Epstein isn't Americans' top priority,half of respondents saidthey are dissatisfied with the amount of information released about the Epstein case after the Justice Department released a memo saying there is no evidence the convicted sex offender kept a so-called client list or was murdered. That includes 56% of Democrats, 52% of independents and 40% of Republicans. Democrats, in search of an advantage against Trump and administration officials who pledged prior to taking office to release Epstein-related files, have sought to force the issue. In the Senate this week, ahead of its own recess, Democrats areusing an arcane procedural toolto try to force the Justice Department to release all of the files related to Epstein, including audio, video and any other relevant documents. Republican leadership, meanwhile, is eager to stay away from the topic of Epstein. House Speaker Mike Johnson cut legislative business short and sent members home early last week to avoid being forced to hold votes on releasing Epstein-related files. The National Republican Congressional Committee, the House GOP's campaign arm, encouraged House Republicans in a memo to use the August recess to focus on selling Trump's agenda. "With the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law just a few weeks ago, this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering," the NRCC memo said. Some House Republicans who have held town halls have been asked about the Epstein files. Utah GOP Rep. Mike Kennedy compared the unreleased Epstein files to "a festering oil-infected wound with pus underneath" in response to a question about whether he would vote in favor of releasing the documents during a virtual town hall last week. Kennedy pledged to push for "full transparency" in the matter and that he would "vote immediately to get all that released," permitted that the identities of victims are concealed. As Republican Rep. William Timmons of South Carolina fielded questions at a telephone town hall last week, one caller shared his "outrage" over the Epstein files – asking why the House adjourned "when this hasn't been dealt with." "If there's a group of pedophiles out there who are just getting away with it, this is an outrage, and I don't care who they are. I don't care if they're the president of the United States," the caller said. Timmons responded that "there is evil in this world, and we have to protect the innocent, so we need to get to the bottom of it." "The president and the attorney general are doing the work necessary to release all of the information," he said. "The Republican Congress should not be attacking the president," the GOP lawmaker said. "The president has earned our trust, has earned the right for us to defer to him on issues at the executive branch." But other issues have dominated town halls so far this summer — including the GOP's "big, beautiful bill," border security and deportations and federal funding cuts. At a Hageman town hall earlier this week, Jane Sanderson, 75, of Worland, who voted for the congresswoman, asked her why the Department of Government Efficiency's spending cuts hadn't put a dent in the United States' national debt. Timmons, the South Carolina congressman, was asked about health care, tariffs and aviation safety. Trump's golf habits came up as often as Epstein. At the same time Pocan held court in Prairie du Chien, Steil, a three-hour drive away in Elkhorn, was accused of doing Trump's bidding too frequently. "President Trump seems to run Southeast Wisconsin through you," one audience member told him. Steil faced criticism over the Trump administration's treatment of undocumented immigrants. He was shouted down as he defended Trump's implementation of tariffs on imports from a host of trading partners. And the town hall ended amid shouting after he began to answer a question about starvation in Gaza — an issue that is splintering the right, as Trump pushes Israel to address the humanitarian crisis as its military actions there continue. "To me, the easy answer to address this crisis is for Hamas to surrender and release the hostages. That ends the war tomorrow," Steil said, in a comment that was met with a mix of cheers and shouts of disagreement. "Israel was unfairly, unjustly attacked, their civilians were killed and kidnapped by Hamas terrorists." CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi, Sarah Davis, Jenna Monnin and Betul Tuncer contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess

Epstein files controversy consuming Capitol Hill has fueled less fire at first lawmaker town halls of summer recess The Jeffrey Epstein file...
Senate leaving Russia sanctions power fully in Trump's handsNew Foto - Senate leaving Russia sanctions power fully in Trump's hands

Republican senators are getting ready to leave Washington without advancing a major sanctions bill against Russia, giving President Trump sole discretion over whether to follow through on his threats against Russian President Vladimir Putin if he refuses to halt his war against Ukraine. Trump has given an Aug. 8 deadline for Putin to stop fighting or risk tariffs on countries that import Russian oil. As a preview,he announced 25 percent tariffs on India, a major importer of Russian energy. That's far below the 500 percent secondary tariff power Congress laid out in draft legislation. While Senate Ukraine hawks wanted to see their sanctions bill pass before the monthlong break, they ultimately left the decision entirely in Trump's hands, at least for the summer. "I think he's going to be very careful about what he does," Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said when asked by The Hill if Trump can be trusted to impose costs on Putin. "But I think he is clearly disappointed in Putin and I think he is now coming around to recognizing that many of us were right." Democrats have expressed skepticism Trump will punish Putin, even as the president has shown increasing frustration with the Russian leader's refusal to accept a ceasefire. Trump said Friday he ordered nuclear submarines to the region in response to threats of nuclear weapons use from Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president, current deputy chair of the security council and frequent online provocateur. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," Trump posted on his social media site Truth Social. Trump told reporters Thursday that his special envoy for peace missions, Steve Witkoff, is expected to travel to Russia following a visit to Israel on Friday. Trump described Russia's ongoing attacks against Ukraine as "disgusting." "We have about eight days. … We're going to put sanctions," he said. Even as Trump has shortened the deadline for Russia to get serious about peace talks, the president is hedging on the impact U.S. financial penalties will have on Putin's country. "I don't know that sanctions bother him. You know? They know about sanctions. I know better than anybody about sanctions, and tariffs and everything else. I don't know if that has any effect. But we're going to do it." While the U.S. has steadily ramped up sanctions on Russia throughout the war, the Senate bill would have marked a major economic escalation, seeking to isolate Moscow from trading partners that have kept its wartime economy afloat. "Maintaining pressure on Russia economically, and going after its oil revenues in particular, remain crucial to containing and limiting Russia's current and future military and foreign policy options," experts with the Center for Strategic and International Studieswrote in a reportlate last month. Steep tariffs on Russia's trading partners would also risk shocks to the global energy market and further strain on U.S. relations with major economies such as India, China and Brazil. Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said deciding which sanctions are imposed — if Russia passes Trump's deadline — "are a work in progress," speaking with The Hill on Friday. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), coauthor of the Russia sanctions bill with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said he would view it as a win if Trump imposed even a fifth of what the Senate was proposing. "We propose in our bill 500 percent. If it's 250 percent, I could live with it. Even if it's 100 percent, possibly. But you ought to impose bone-crushing sanctions that will stop them from fueling Russia's war machine," Blumenthal said. The Connecticut senator said even as he holds out hope for Trump to give Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) the green light to bring the sanctions bill to the floor, the bill has already moved U.S. policy. "It has given credibility and momentum to the idea of sanctions so that now, even President Trump, who was seemingly Putin's best buddy, is giving him deadlines to stop the war or face sanctions," he said. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, pointed to Trump's 25 percent tariffs on India as further evidence of this impact. Indian state oil refiners have already moved topause imports of Russian oil, with the tariff set to go into effect Aug. 7. "Clearly, India was paying attention to that. I think it's positive progress that the president is looking at ways in which he can put more pressure on Russia," she said. Graham said Trump has "adopted the theory of the case" — going after countries that purchase Russian oil and don't help Ukraine. "He can do it through executive action, or with the bill," he said. "I think the bill, as you say, gives him leverage, and we're in good discussions, so stay tuned." But some Republican senators pointed to a missed opportunity in adjourning before a vote on the Graham-Blumenthal bill. "I don't think there are enough sanctions we can place on Russia. I think we should keep hammering them and make sure Ukraine's armed," said Sen. Pete Ricketts (Neb.), the No. 2 Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Rounds told The Hill he believed the time is now to put the sanctions bill on the floor. Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on Europe and Regional Security Cooperation, said he wanted a Senate vote on the sanctions package so the House could be ready to take it up when they come back in September. "I think having that tool in your tool chest, ready to go, would be a good thing and keep the pressure on Russia," he said. "I think it gives [Trump] more leverage. You can always hold it ready to go, send it over to the House if needed and then to the president's desk. I think that's not a bad strategy." Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), also a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, agreed. "I think that's why it's important for us to have this teed up and ready — it gives [Trump] an option, and the more options he has the better," he said. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told The Hill on Wednesday that Thune was "absolutely aware" of his desire to vote on the Russia sanctions bill before the August recess. "I certainly think it would be an excellent thing to do." Thune's office told The Hill on Friday it had no scheduling announcements related to the Graham-Blumenthal bill. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

Senate leaving Russia sanctions power fully in Trump’s hands

Senate leaving Russia sanctions power fully in Trump's hands Republican senators are getting ready to leave Washington without advancing...
Sha'Carri Richardson arrested in alleged domestic violence incident, police sayNew Foto - Sha'Carri Richardson arrested in alleged domestic violence incident, police say

Sha'Carri Richardsonwas arrested after an alleged incident at theSeattle–Tacoma International Airport, according to a police report obtained by USA TODAY Sports. According to the report, Richardson was arrested for domestic violence on Sunday. Richardson and a male companion were involved in a verbal altercation as they exited through airport security, the police report states. Richardson allegedly pushed the man and he fell into a nearby column, according to the Seattle Police Department. According to the report, police viewed airport security footage, and the video allegedly showed the man attempting to walk away from Richardson, but she continued to bump into him. Police also say Richardson threw a pair of headphones at the man. Richardson was booked at the South Correctional Entity in Des Moines, Washington, on Sunday and released on Monday, jail records show. "We are aware of the report and we have no comment at this time,"USA Track and Fieldsaid to USA TODAY Sports. Richardson ran a 11.07 and finished second in her heat in the 100 meters to advance to Friday's semifinal at theU.S. track and field championships.Richardson later withdrewfrom the 100 semifinal but has decided to run in the 200 on Sunday, according to USA track and field. The U.S. championships serves as a qualifing meet for the world championships. Richardson has a bye into the 100 at this year's world championships because she is the defending champion. Richardson earned asilver medal in the 100 at the 2024 Paris Olympics. She was also a part ofTeam USA's gold-medal winning 4x100-relay team. Richardson is one of the most recognizable American track and field athletes. She won the 100 meters at the 2020 Olympic trials but was later suspended for testing positive for marijuana and didn't compete at the Tokyo Olympics. This story has been updated with new information. The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Sha'Carri Richardson arrested earlier this week, jail records show

Sha'Carri Richardson arrested in alleged domestic violence incident, police say

Sha'Carri Richardson arrested in alleged domestic violence incident, police say Sha'Carri Richardsonwas arrested after an alleged in...
The Sharpe brothers make history in Pro Football Hall of FameNew Foto - The Sharpe brothers make history in Pro Football Hall of Fame

Let's roll back the clock to Aug. 6, 2011. That's whenShannon Sharpedelivered one of the most riveting induction speeches in the history of the Pro Football Hall of Fame with a bottom-line message for the ages. "I'm the only football player that's in the Hall of Fame, and the second-best player in my own family," Shannon declared, prompting a standing ovation from the crowd and tears from his presenter and big brother, Sterling. "If fate had dealt you a different hand," he added, speaking to Sterling, "there is no question, no question in my mind we would have become the first brothers to be elected to the Hall of Fame." Shannon, who became the 267th Hall of Famer, propelled by the three Super Bowl rings he won with theDenver BroncosandBaltimore Ravens, went on to urge the Hall of Fame's selection committee to take up the case for his brother. "All I can do is ask in the most humblest way I know, is that the next time you go into that room or start making a list, look at Sterling Sharpe's accomplishments," he said. Well, 14 years later and 31 years since Sterling was forced to retire after seven superb NFL seasons with theGreen Bay Packersdue to a neck injury, it has happened. Shannon and Sterling, who will become the 382nd enshrinee on Saturday, are the first set of brothers elected for busts in Canton. Maybe there will be more. The Kelces, Travis and Jason, will be in the mix someday. The Watts, J.J. and T.J., could have a shot if the younger brother keeps up his pace. And a few months ago, Eli Manning, Peyton's younger brother, was a Hall finalist in his first year of eligibility. Yet 25,000 men have played in the NFL since it was established in 1920 and it hasn't happened for a pair of brothers – until now. What are the odds? In the case of the Sharpe brothers, three years apart, their distinction is underscored by their remarkable journey from rural Georgia, where they were raised by late grandparents, Barney and Mary Porter, challenged by poverty. When I listened to the brothers on Shannon's "Club Shay Shay" podcast this week, reflecting on the conditions they endured growing up in a 1,000-square-foot cinder block home with cement floors and without running water, it added extra layers of appreciation for their achievements. Shannon, whose loquacious persona propelled him to become a media megastar after football, is hardly dropping hyperbole when he calls Sterling's Hall of Fame election the "proudest moment of my life." After all, Sterling – the hero and role model whose every word he hung on – once had the task of taking a young Shannon to the outhouse in the middle of the night. Shannon, who gave his big brother his first Super Bowl ring, certainly did his best in keeping his brother's candidacy alive. I've been a Hall selector for nearly 30 years and in recent years when I'd reach out to Shannon to get his take on one NFL topic after another, he would routinely end the exchange with a reminder about his brother's worthiness for a Hall call. The suggestions never came off as pushy, out of bounds or over the top and were nowhere in the ballpark of some of the campaigning for candidates that come our way as selectors. Instead, Shannon's efforts came off as authentic … even as he preached to the choir about Sterling's case. That it wasn't automatic for Sterling – the first receiver to post 100 receptions in back-to-back seasons, an All-Decade choice for the 1990s with a "Triple Crown" milestone in 1992 – was a function of his injury-shortened career more than anything. It certainly helped Sterling's chances that Terrell Davis, Tony Boselli and Kenny Easley earned Hall status with their own injury-shortened careers, yet his case stood on its own merits. Sterling is part of a relatively small class that includes cornerbackEric Allen,defensive endJared Allen(no relation to Eric) and tight end Antonio Gates, who has his own distinctive "first" with his honor. Gates is the only player chosen for the Hall of Fame who didn't play football in college, when he starred as a basketball player. Shannon, though, has one regret about this long-awaited moment for his brother that underscores the twists and turns of life. On Wednesday,The Athletic reported that ESPN won't be bringing Shannon backto the network for his role on the popular "First Take" show – dumping the former tight end who was suspended since April, when a former romantic partner filed a civil suit that alleged sexual assault and battery, seeking $50 million in damages.The suit was recently settled out of court. Talk about tough timing. Shannon's big brother finally gets his Hall call … while news emerges about his personal setback. "They did what they feel they needed to do and I'm at peace with that," Shannon said on Wednesday night on "The Nightcap" podcast he hosts with former NFL receiver Chad Johnson. "But I just wish thing could have waited until Monday because I hate the fact that I'm overshadowing my brother." Then again, it's a different type of fate. The timing is another element of the moment. Shannon needs not sweat it. Not now. Generations from now, the legacy of the Sharpe brothers reflected with their busts in Canton will reflect their impact as two of the greatest players who ever played pro football. And given the journey that includes Sterling's extended wait, a lot of peace comes with that. Contact Jarrett Bell atjbell@usatoday.comor follow on social media: On X: @JarrettBell On Bluesky: jarrettbell.bsky.social This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Sterling Sharpe joins brother in the Pro Football Hall of Fame

The Sharpe brothers make history in Pro Football Hall of Fame

The Sharpe brothers make history in Pro Football Hall of Fame Let's roll back the clock to Aug. 6, 2011. That's whenShannon Sharpede...
DOJ targets noncitizens on voter rolls as part of Trump election integrity pushNew Foto - DOJ targets noncitizens on voter rolls as part of Trump election integrity push

Attorney GeneralPam Bondihas directed Department of Justice (DOJ) officials to probe election practices throughout the country as part of the Trump administration's efforts to crack down on federal election laws. The DOJ's Civil Rights Division is largely leading the effort, which has involved seeking information from states about their election practices and voter registration lists, sometimes known as "voter rolls," and placing an emphasis on identifying any noncitizens on them. "Election integrity starts with clean voter rolls. That's the foundation for secure elections," a DOJ source told Fox News. "There's been a culture of noncompliance from several states that don't keep their roles updated. This DOJ is cracking down." Trump Appointee Vows To Focus Doj's Largest Division On Dei, Denaturalization Some states, likeWisconsinandUtah, shared recent election-related correspondence they had with the DOJ on state websites. New Hampshire's Republican secretary of state rejected arequestto provide the DOJ with a statewide database of voters, saying laws do not allow the state to do that. The department sent more unusual demand letters to numerous local election offices in California, asking for extensive personal data about any noncitizens who ended up on voter registration lists. Read On The Fox News App At least one of the recipients, Orange County, resisted therequest, prompting the DOJ to sue. Attorneys for the county responded that county election officials were authorized under federal law to withhold sensitive information about voters. The flurry of activity stems from an executive order Trump signed in March tasking the attorney general with coordinating with states on election integrity, which has been a top priority for him since his 2020 election loss. Trump ordered the DOJ to review how states manage their voter registration lists, enter into information-sharing agreements with the states, aid states with prosecuting election-related crimes, and punish uncooperative states where possible. Doj Launches Investigation Into Blue State City Over Alleged Race-based Hiring Several Democrat-led states sued over the order, and a federal judge in Massachusetts temporarily blocked parts of it, saying "the Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections." The DOJ is appealing the ruling. Sen.Dick Durbin, D-Ill., blasted the DOJ's efforts, suggesting they were designed to hinder racial minorities' ability to vote. "These efforts, made under the guise of combating fraud, will disproportionately endanger voters of color, low-income communities, and active-duty military personnel," Durbin said. Trump has frequently voiced his grievances about voter fraud, saying it is widespread and that illegal immigrants are voting, but there is scant evidence to support those claims. While states have identified noncitizens on voter rolls and removed them as part of routine voter list maintenance, rarely have they been found to have cast ballots. "Existing safeguards are broadly effective," a Center for Election Innovation and Researchanalysisrecently found. Last October, aChinese nationalallegedly voted in the 2024 election in Michigan. The suspect, a University of Michigan student living legally in the country, used his student identification information and other data to complete a same-day voter registration form. He was charged with voter fraud and perjury. Original article source:DOJ targets noncitizens on voter rolls as part of Trump election integrity push

DOJ targets noncitizens on voter rolls as part of Trump election integrity push

DOJ targets noncitizens on voter rolls as part of Trump election integrity push Attorney GeneralPam Bondihas directed Department of Justice ...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com