With their brand in the 'toilet,' Democrats commence shadow 2028 primary for presidentNew Foto - With their brand in the 'toilet,' Democrats commence shadow 2028 primary for president

WhenKamala Harriswas asked point blank if the reason she passed on running for California governor was because she is seeking a different office, the former Democratic vice president said she doesn't "want to go back in the system" just yet. "I want to travel the country, I want to listen to people, I want to talk with people and I don't want it to be transactional, where I'm asking for their vote," Harris said during a July 31 on"The Late Show with Stephen Colbert", her first interview sincestiff arming the 2026 election to lead her native Golden State. But the 60-year-old can't help and leave bread crumbs out for supporters, such as when she hinted in her announcement that she will be "sharing more details in the months ahead" about her future. More:Kamala Harris' decision kickstarts the 2028 Democratic presidential primary: 5 takeaways "That's leaving more than the door ajar, that's pushing the door wide open," Michael Feldman, a former senior adviser to Vice President Al Gore, told USA TODAY. "I understand the optionality that creates for her: she shut a door, she's opening another. And by the way, nobody wants to foreclose their options and their opportunity." If Harris does enter the fray for athird tryat the presidency it will certainly stir the 2028 pot. She brings thehighest name ID of any suspected contenderand an even broader donor network with established relationships to boot. But campaign experts and strategists warn that no one shouldexpect a red carpetto the nomination this time around. "There will be a contested primary," Feldman said. "There will be a large field of people who feel like it's their time and it's their moment." More:Town halls, f-bombs and Elon Musk: How Democrats are waging a new messaging war As theDemocratic reboot continues, White House hopefuls such asHarrisare tiptoeing into an earlier than usual shadow campaign that political observers say they believe will be among the party's most consequential presidential primaries in decades. "More is riding on this pre-primary race than in most years because the party's brand is in the toilet," said Matthew Dallek, a historian and professor of political management at George Washington University. But Democrats must be cautious about trotting too far to the left based on the outcome of a single or handful of recent elections, some strategists warn.Vice President JD Vance, thought by many to benext in line to inherit the MAGA mantlefor populist-minded conservatives, is one of the more effective national communicators for Republicans with sharpened skills as Trump's attack dog. He andother potential GOP figuresare ready to dig Democrats a deeper hole. More:JD Vance is now the MAGA heir-apparent. Does that make him the front-runner for 2028? While voting won't commence in the next White House race for 17 more months, that's not stopping a number of sitting governors, senators and other aspiring future Democratic presidents to be making pilgrimages to early voting states. They're also penning memoirs, doing marathon podcast interviews, squirreling away campaign cash and outlining their stances on topics that will be relevant to the progressive base, moderates and eventually independent voters down the line. More:Kamala Harris explores 'drama of running for president' in new book on 2024 bid All of the preliminary jockeying from such a diverse and crowded unofficial field suggests a resilience among rank-and-file Democrats despiteabysmal approval ratingsthat haven't been this low among voters since 1990. "The only way to begin to improve it is through whoever the next presidential nominee will be," Dallek said "The stakes, in that sense, are higher. It's not just the presidency. It's not just the nomination. There's a sense among Democrats that they need to do this, and there's a big debate." Several 2028 hopefuls have already begun to make strategic moves to keep their name in the mix with the party faithful. About a dozen have visited or have plans to make stops in the early primary states, such as Illinois Gov.JB Pritzker, 60, who inApril caught attention for delivering a searing speechin New Hampshire aimed at 'do-nothing' Democrats. Sen.Ruben Gallego, 45, of Arizona, whose name has lately shot up on the rumored list of White House candidates, is set to attend two events in the Granite State later this month too, further fueling speculation that he's a possible contender. "I'll be on the ground in New Hampshire... taking on the GOP's billionaire agenda and standing up for working families," Gallego, who was elected to the Senate last fall, said in aJuly 29 post on X. California Gov. GavinNewsom, 57, trekked through rural South Carolinain July. He was followed by Kentucky Gov.Andy Beshear, 47, whotalked up flipping red stateswith union leaders and later Rep.Ro Khanna, 48, D-Calif., who made afour-day tour featuring town halls and visits to Black churches. Former U.S. Transportation SecretaryPete Buttigieg, 43, may claim he "isn't running for anything" but his May trip toIowa for a veterans-focused forumfocused heavily on existential questions facing Democrats and the country. Buttigieg shot to famerunning for president in 2020as the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, and he has been raising his national brand through a podcast tour. Other potential contenders are also taking the podcast route, including Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, 46, who recently lamented howDemocrats "gave up on"entire swaths of the country during a July 29 sit-down chat on former DNC chair Jaime Harrison's "At Our Table." "I'm very much am a person of action, and I think as a party we've got to stop being the party of 'no and slow' and start being the party of 'yes and now,'" said Moore, whosename is tossed arounddespite saying he isn't running for president. More:Harris campaign's embrace of social media influencers is years in the making Nina Smith, a Democratic strategist who worked on Buttigieg's 2020 presidential campaign, said these early moves serve the candidates by creating and maintaining local connections. They also lend to rebuilding the party's brand organically through the excitement of a nominee. "There's some juice, there's some fire, from the perspective of people who want to step up and lead and be the standard bearer for our party," Smith said. "We're kind of spoiled for choices in that regard. That's a good thing." Such an elongated presidential campaign can exhaust resources as much as voters, which may explain why notable 2028 contenders are storing up massive cash reserves. Khanna, whose California district is located in the heart of Silicon Valley, had roughly $14.2 million in his campaign coffers at the end of June, according to the latest Federal Election Commission report. Other congressional Democrats on the 2028 list who can legally transfer their funds to a presidential campaign include Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., 35, who had arecord-breaking first quarter haulthis year and had about $9.8 million in the bank. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., 51, amedia mavenwith possible White House aspirations, holds approximately $10.2 million in his accounts. One feature of the pre-primary jockeying that is coming into focus is the major differences within the Democratic ranks, such as how best to oppose the Trump administration's bulldozing agenda. An example of that larger debate was on display on Capitol Hill this past week when Sen.Cory Booker, D-NJ, a rumored 2028 contender,blasted his fellow party membersfor supporting a bundle of proposals backed by the GOP administration that would increase resources and funding to police departments and officers. More:'It's with a full heart that I share this news': Cory Booker drops out of 2020 race "This, to me, is the problem with Democrats in America right now is we're willing to be complicit toDonald Trumpto let this pass through when we have all the leverage right now," said Booker, 56, who ran ashort-lived 2020 presidential campaignand has garnered renewed interest sincedelivering a record-breaking Senate speech. Booker's comment outraged Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., 65, another prospective andformer 2020 White House contender, who needled him for missing a committee hearing on the bipartisan package. There are other issues for Democrats to sort out as well, such as navigating the rising populism from the left over cost of living concerns that helped propelZohran Mamdani's primary winin the New York City mayor's race. Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, 65, a centrist-aligned Democrat who isbeing urged to runby more moderate voices, has cautioned against Democrats embracing the 33-year-old New Yorker who is hoping Big Apple voters will pick him this November to lead the nation's largest city. "Recognizing that the American dream is unaffordable and inaccessible and that working hard no longer guarantees getting ahead isn't a socialist observation; it's clear to people of all political stripes," Emanuel said in a June 26 op-ed to the Wall Street Journal. More:Rahm Emanuel warns Democrats in 2020 not to play to 'socialist' type "Affordable healthcare, lifetime retirement security and affordable community college are as American as apple pie, but they won't be realized by consulting the Democratic Socialists of America's playbook," added Emanuel, who most recently served as Biden's U.S. ambassador to Japan and previously was an Illinois congressman and White House chief of staff to then-President Barack Obama. Feldman, the former Gore advisor, said there's a lot of energy among the progressive wing of the party that can't be dismissed, but he questions if someone such as Mamdani could be competitive in a national general election. "My argument would be, no, he couldn't be," Feldman said. "So, you know, there'll be an argument between the various factions in the Democratic Party about what policies we want to present to the American people, and can you harness the energy in the electorate." More:Election 2024 recap: 'We accept the results,' Harris concedes Other Democratic thinkers agree these sort of sparring matches are inevitable but that they should be looked at more optimistically in the 2028 context given the presidential field is expected to include uber-progressives, centrists and even moderately conservative. "It's gonna be messy and personal, and it's going to feel bad sometimes in the process, but I think it's going to help us shape as a party, what we believe," Amanda Litman, a former Obama 2012 and Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign staffer who co-foundedRun for Something, a progressive group that supports candidates for public office, told USA TODAY. Every potential 2028 contender will have to talk about a voter's lived experiences and connect with them on the issues that matter most, according to various Democrats who spoke with USA TODAY. But they will also have to evolve with the progressive base on issues the mainstream party has been fearful to embrace. Former Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., who lost his reelection bid last year, is toutingnew polling by Data for Progressreleased in late July that shows of New York City primary voters strongly sympathize with Palestinians. The survey found support for Palestinian rights fueled much of Mamdani's support, including 78% of respondents who said Israel is committing genocide in the region and another 79% who said they support restricting weapons to the U.S. ally. Bowman, who wasopposed heavily by pro-Israel groups, pointed out that Khanna stood up early as one of the first members of Congress tocall for a cease-fireduring the Biden era, saying his former colleague should get "a lot of credit for that." As the 2028 field takes shape, Bowman argued that the party cannot be seen as titling the scales against more left-leaning contenders. He also warned the possible presidential contenders that they should not ignore the shifting tides that populist-minded progressives are causing, especially amid widespread reports ofstarvation in Gaza. "I expect a robust primary debate," Bowman told USA TODAY. "And I hope that ideas rule the day over special interests and politics where we can see the rise of an authentic, historic leadership." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:After 2024 wipeout, Democrats' shadow 2028 primary has begun

With their brand in the 'toilet,' Democrats commence shadow 2028 primary for president

With their brand in the 'toilet,' Democrats commence shadow 2028 primary for president WhenKamala Harriswas asked point blank if the...
Democratic governors throw support behind Newsom, back partisan redistrictingNew Foto - Democratic governors throw support behind Newsom, back partisan redistricting

A number of high-profile Democratic governors are ready to fight -- ardently throwing support behind their colleagues who have said they will draw new Congressional maps to favor Democrats before the 2026 midterm elections in order to directly counterTexas Republicans' movesto do the same for their party. Texas GOP lawmakers just this week released their first draft of the state's new congressional map that could flip three to five Democratic seats in next year's midterms. On Thursday, California Gov.Gavin Newsompromptly responded, saying he'd spoken with state legislators and members of Congress about holding a special statewide election on Nov. 4 for Californians to vote on new congressional maps -- ones that would likely favor Democrats. Convening later in the week for a summer policy retreat on the shores of Madison, Wisconsin, a number of leading Democratic governors have backed Newsom and any other blue state leaders who are taking an offensive position on redistricting. MORE: Texas Republicans propose new congressional maps that could allow GOP gains The Democrats each did so reluctantly, calling Texas Republicans' efforts "unconstitutional" and "un-American" with hopes that the courts intervene before any new maps steered by either party are implemented. In the meantime, they said it's time to fight against the Trump-championed GOP redistricting, especially now that other Republican-led states, including Missouri, might follow suit. "That is so un-American, and it's a constant threat to our democracy," Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers said about Republican proposals. "So I'm really pissed, frankly, and we are going to do whatever we can do to stop this from happening." Gov. Laura Kelly of Kansas, the Chair of the Democratic Governors Association, explicitly got behind Newsom, Kathy Hochul of New York, JB Pritzker of Illinois and any other governors who are weighing counteraction through special elections, special sessions or additional means of redrawing congressional maps. "I have never believed in unilateral disarmament, and so while I may not want to participate in certain activities, if I have to, in order to level the playing field, I would support my Democratic colleagues who decide to answer in kind," Kelly said in an interview. "If the other side is going to pursue this, regardless of the obvious unconstitutionality of it, then I don't think we have any other choice but to go there. You just don't go to the front lines without your bullets," Kelly said. Kelly said her strong "preference" would still be for courts to intervene. "In fact, it might actually work to our benefit, you know, to play like this. Okay, we'll play this game too, and we all go to court." Then, Kelly said, "we all lose." MORE: First to ABC: DNC ramps up anti-redistricting efforts in Texas with calls to 'persuadable' GOP voters The process of redistricting could prove to be an uphill battle for Democrats, who have less of an opportunity to gerrymander nationwide than their peers across the aisle because of the varied rules of each state. It's the responsibility of partisan legislatures in many Republican-led states to draw the boundaries of all electoral districts. Many more Democratic states use independent citizen-redistricting commissions -- a practice used to maintain fairness and combat gerrymandering. "I do worry," Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said during the press conference in Madison, about the outcome for Democrats if they decide to get in the redistricting fight. But, Kelly jumped in, "there's a bigger risk in doing nothing." "You know, we can't just let this happen and act like it's fine and hope that the courts fix it. We have no idea, quite honestly, at this point, what the courts might do, but by virtue of us responding in kind, we do send a message," Kelly added. "We will put up a fight." Evers, who campaigned for governor twice on ending gerrymandering in Wisconsin -- culminating with their Supreme Court's decision to strike down the state's non-contiguous state legislative maps as unconstitutional -- said that Wisconsin would not be making any changes to their maps. Other states, though, who may be "up against the wall" should make modifications, Evers said. "We're not changing our maps. Here in the state of Wisconsin, we worked hard to get fair maps, and we're going to continue to do so … in my heart of hearts, this is where we have to be. But when ... you have a gun against your head, you got to do something," Evers said. Govs. Kelly, Walz, and a number of other Democratic governors also said they'd steer clear of redrawing their maps this cycle, either because they lead predominantly Republican states or because their redistricting processes wouldn't allow for a swift process to combat current GOP efforts. The idea of retaliating against Republicans on the matter of redistricting is a notable shift in strategy for Democrats, who have long touted their reverence for "playing by the rules" on constitutional issues. For years, Democrats have championed independent redistricting and rules meant to encourage fairer maps are now holding them back in some areas and making it more challenging for them in certain districts. "Democrats are expected to have the decorum. We're expected to protect the institution. We're expected to follow the rules on this," Walz said, saying time for the party to go aggressively on offense to combat the Trump administration. "We're not playing with a normal administration. We're playing one that is throwing all the rules out of there, and if the courts that he has packed aren't going to do that, then I think it is incumbent upon states that have the capacity or the ability to make sure that we are responding in kind," said Walz. "It is a terrible spot we're in as a country, but not responding is going to make it even worse."

Democratic governors throw support behind Newsom, back partisan redistricting

Democratic governors throw support behind Newsom, back partisan redistricting A number of high-profile Democratic governors are ready to fig...
Luka Doncic agrees to a contract extension through 2028 with the Lakers, committing to his new teamNew Foto - Luka Doncic agrees to a contract extension through 2028 with the Lakers, committing to his new team

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Luka Doncic has agreed to a three-year, $165 million maximum contract extension with the Los Angeles Lakers, bypassing a chance at free agency next summer to build a long-term future with his new team. The deal keeps Doncic with Los Angeles through 2028. The Slovenian superstar had a player option for the 2026-27 season under his previous contract. A person with knowledge of the deal confirmed the terms to The Associated Press on Saturday. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the Lakers don't publicly announce the details of contracts. "Excited to keep working to bring championships to LA and make Laker Nation proud," Doncic wrote on social media. "Grateful to the Lakers, my teammates and all the fans who've shown so much love since day one. This is just the beginning." The Lakers acquired Doncic from the Dallas Mavericks last Februaryin a seismic trade for Anthony Davis. The five-time All-NBA selection and a five-time All-Star averaged 28.2 points, 8.2 assists and 7.7 rebounds per game last season while teaming up with LeBron James for 50 victories and the No. 3 seed in the Western Conference playoffs. Los Angeles lost to Minnesota in the first round, but Doncic enjoyed his first months in Hollywood enough to commit to the Lakers. He will return this fall alongside James, who will begin his unprecedented 23rd NBA season. Doncic's growing comfort with the Lakers was already obvious in his offseason activity. He played a significant role in Los Angeles' successful bids to sign Deandre Ayton and Marcus Smart, persuading the two veterans to team up for the upcoming season. Doncic's extensive regimen of offseason conditioning work has also been well-documented after the Mavericks' questions about his physical commitment to the sport reportedly played a role in his shocking departure from Dallas. ___ AP NBA:https://apnews.com/NBA

Luka Doncic agrees to a contract extension through 2028 with the Lakers, committing to his new team

Luka Doncic agrees to a contract extension through 2028 with the Lakers, committing to his new team LOS ANGELES (AP) — Luka Doncic has agree...
WNBA Game Halted Once Again After Sex Toy Flies onto Court for Second Time This WeekNew Foto - WNBA Game Halted Once Again After Sex Toy Flies onto Court for Second Time This Week

Shaina Benhiyoun/SPP/Sipa The Golden State Valkyries and the Chicago Sky faced off during a game on Friday, Aug. 1, at the Wintrust Arena in Chicago However, during the second half of the game, a patron threw a green sex toy onto the court This marks the second time this week a sex toy was tossed onto the court in the middle of the game Another WNBA game was halted due to an object being thrown onto the court. On Friday, Aug. 1, the Golden State Valkyries faced the Chicago Sky, and 7 minutes and 42 seconds into the third quarter, a patron threw an unexpected object onto the court of the Wintrust Arena in Chicago. The broadcast caught footage of a green sex toy being thrown on the sidelines just shy of the court, later shared onX. The referee quickly blew the whistle, halting the game, and the announcer is heard saying, "Got a whistle away from the basketball." A second referee went over to the object and kicked it off the sidelines, and then another staff member went to pick it up with a towel to remove it from the vicinity. Patrick McDermott/Getty https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cuf This marked the second time a sex toy was tossed onto the basketball court. On Tuesday, July 29, during the Golden State Valkyries' game against the the Atlanta Dream,a green sex toy landed on the courtduring the game's final seconds. "Something flies on the court actually from the crowd. And you can see the object... the green thing bounces and it goes to the sideline," sports announcer Morgan Ragan said. "We're not exactly sure where it came from," she continued, as a timeout was called and the game was paused. After the object was identified, she said, "Oh my gosh, OK. OK, inappropriate. Get them out of here, whoever it is [that threw it]." Gary Dineen/NBAE via Getty Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Following the second incident, Chicago Sky player Angel Reese wrote a cheekyX postand joked about Indiana Fever player, Sydney Colson, "hey @SydJColson,  why do you keep throwing your mean green in different arenas…. it's getting weird." Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham also shared anX post: "stop throwing dildos on the court… you're going to hurt one of us." The owners of the two sex toys have yet to be publicly identified, but if the arena had identified the perpetrators, they would have been immediately removed from the space due to the WNBA policy. According to the WNBA'sFan Code of Conducton its website, "Guests who engage in fighting, throwing objects or attempting to enter the court will be immediately ejected from the arena." Read the original article onPeople

WNBA Game Halted Once Again After Sex Toy Flies onto Court for Second Time This Week

WNBA Game Halted Once Again After Sex Toy Flies onto Court for Second Time This Week Shaina Benhiyoun/SPP/Sipa The Golden State Valkyries an...
Limited options for Democrats to retaliate if Texas Republicans redraw congressional mapNew Foto - Limited options for Democrats to retaliate if Texas Republicans redraw congressional map

WASHINGTON (AP) — As Republicans move toredraw legislative mapsin red states to pad their narrow House majority in Washington, some Democrats arerethinking their embraceof a nonpartisan approach toline-drawingthat now complicates their party's ability to hit back before next year's midterm elections. In many Democratic-controlled states, independent commissions rather than the state legislature handle redistricting, the normally-once-a-decade task of adjusting congressional and legislative districts so their populations are equal. Parties in the majority can exploit that process to shape their lawmakers' districts so they are almost guaranteed reelection. The commission model limits parties' ability to game the system, leading to more competitive districts. Not all redistricting commissions were created at Democrats' insistence. And, like Republicans, the party has exploited line-drawing for its own gain in the handful of states where it controls the process. But unlike Republicans, many Democratic Party leaders have embraced the nonpartisan model. That means Democrats have fewer options to match Republicans, who areredrawing the U.S. House map in Texasat PresidentDonald Trump'surging to carve outas many asfive new winnable seatsfor the GOP. That could be enough to prevent Democrats from winning back the majority next year. Democrats have threatened payback. During a gathering Friday in Wisconsin of Democratic governors, several of them said they wanted to retaliate because the stakes are so high. Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, who has pushed for a nonpartisan redistricting commission in his state, said Democrats must "do whatever we can" to counter the Republican efforts to redraw congressional maps. "When you have a gun against your head, you've got to do something," he said. Despite the ambitious talk, Democrats largely have their hands tied. Democratic states have limited ability to redistrict for political edge California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said he and the Democratic-controlled Legislature will try to redraw his state's congressional map. But they would need to repeal or defy the 2008 ballot measure creating an independent redistricting commission. Voters extended its authority to congressional districts two years later. Newsom supported the constitutional amendment at the time, when he was mayor of San Francisco. The Texas redistricting, which is expected to pass the Legislature next week, led him to modify that position. "We can act holier than thou, we can sit on the sidelines, talk about the way the world should be, or we can recognize the existential nature that is this moment," Newsom said earlier this month. In New York, which also has a commission, the state constitution bars another map this decade. Democrats have moved for a change, but that could not happen until 2027 at the earliest, and then only with voter approval. In other states where Democrats control the governor's office and legislature, including Colorado and Washington, the party has backed independent commissions that cannot redraw, let alone rig, maps in the middle of the decade. Democrats say 'foundations of our democracy' at stake When the redistricting cycle kicked off in 2021, after the last census, independent commissions were in charge of drawing 95 House seats that otherwise would have been drawn by Democrats, but only 13 that would have been created by Republicans. In a marker of the shift among Democrats, former Attorney General Eric Holder, who heads the party's redistricting effort and has called repeatedly for a more nonpartisan approach, seemed to bless his party's long shot efforts to overrule their commissions. "We do not oppose – on a temporary basis – responsible, responsive actions to ensure that the foundations of our democracy are not permanently eroded," Holder said in a statement last week. In states where they weren't checked by commissions, Democrats have redistricted just as ruthlessly as Republicans. In Illinois, they drew a map that gave them a 14-3 advantage in the congressional delegation. In New Mexico, they tweaked the map so they control all three House seats. In Nevada, they held three of its four seats in November despiteDonald Trumpwinning the state. Even in states where they have a lopsided advantage, Democrats are exploring ways to maximize it. On Friday, Maryland's House Majority Leader, Democratic Del. David Moon, said he would introduce legislation to trigger redrawing of the congressional lines if Texas moves forward. Democrats hold seven of the state's eight congressional seats. "We can't have one state, especially a very large state, constantly trying to one-up and alter the course of congressional control while the other states sit idly by," he said. Commissions promote 'fair representation,' advocates say Advocates of a nonpartisan model are alarmed by the shift among Democrats. They say the party would redistrict just as aggressively as the GOP if not held in check, depriving voters of a voice in districts whose winners would essentially be selected in advance by political leaders. "We're very desperate — we're looking for any port in a storm," said Emily Eby French, Common Cause's Texas director. "This Democratic tit for tat redistricting seems like a port but it's not a port. It's a jagged rock with a bunch of sirens on them." The group's director of redistricting, Dan Vicuña, said using redistricting for partisan advantage — known as gerrymandering — is highly unpopular with the public: "This is about fair representation for communities." Politicians used to shy away from discussing it openly, but that has changed in today's polarized environment. Trump earlier this month told reporters about his hopes of netting five additional GOP seats in Texas and more out of other Republican-controlled states. He has urged new maps in GOP-controlled states such as Indiana and Missouri, while Ohio Republicans are poised to reshape political lines afterneutralizing a pushto create an independent redistricting commission. Democrats are divided over how to respond to Texas In a sign of the party's divide, Democrats have continued to push for a national redistricting panel that would remove partisanship from the process, even as some call for retaliation against Republicans in defiance of state limitations. "No unilateral disarmament till both sides are following the law," said Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, like Newsom a possible 2028 presidential contender, wrote on X. Gallego's post came a day before his Democratic colleagues gathered to announce they were reintroducing a bill to create the national commission. An identical bill died in 2022 when it couldn't overcome Republican objections despite Democrats controlling Congress and the presidency. It has no chance now that the GOP is in charge of both branches. Sen. Chris Murphy, another potential 2028 contender, didn't express regret over past reforms that have implemented independent redistricting boards in Democratic states, saying the party "should never apologize for being for the right thing." But he added that Republicans "are operating outside of the box right now and we can't stay inside the box." "If they're changing districts in the middle of the 10-year cycle, we have to do the same thing," he said. That approach, however, hasn't caught on across the party. "We shouldn't stoop to their tactics," Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut said. "It's an ideal that we have accurate and fair representation. We can't abandon it just because Republicans try to manipulate and distort it." ___ Riccardi reported from Denver. Associated Press writers Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, Jaimie Ding in Los Angeles, Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York, and Brian Witte in Annapolis, Maryland, contributed to this report.

Limited options for Democrats to retaliate if Texas Republicans redraw congressional map

Limited options for Democrats to retaliate if Texas Republicans redraw congressional map WASHINGTON (AP) — As Republicans move toredraw legi...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com