Macron says 26 countries pledge troops as a reassurance force for Ukraine after fighting endsNew Foto - Macron says 26 countries pledge troops as a reassurance force for Ukraine after fighting ends

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that 26 of Ukraine's allies have pledged to deploy troops as a "reassurance force" for the war-torn country once fighting ends in the conflict with Russia. Macron spoke after a meeting in Paris of the so-called "coalition of the willing," a group of 35 countries who support Ukraine. He said that 26 of the countries had committed to deploying troops in Ukraine — or to maintaining a presence on land, at sea, or in the air — to help guarantee the country's security the day after a ceasefire or peace is achieved. Earlier Thursday, Macron and other European leaders met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the U.S. envoy for peace talks, Steve Witkoff, to discuss ways of ensuring long-term military support and continued American backing for Ukraine once the conflict ends. Zelenskyy also held a closed-door meeting with Witkoff. Macron said at a news conference alongside Zelenskyy that the reassurance force "does not have the will or the objective of waging war against Russia," but will aim "to prevent any new major aggression and to involve the 26 states very clearly in the lasting security of Ukraine." Macron and Zelenskyy say US backs the plan Though details of any U.S. participation in the security guarantees remain unclear, both Macron and Zelenskyy said Washington had expressed willingness to be part of the plan, and the Ukrainian president said he was grateful about that. "As for in what format, I am not yet ready to tell you in detail," Zelenskyy added. "The planning work will be finalized with the United States," Macron said. Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who lead the "coalition of the willing," previously have insisted that any European "reassurance" force in Ukraine needs the backing of the United States. The European leaders — some of whom joined the meeting virtually — said Russian President Vladimir Putin must now work toward ending the fighting, and the German government suggested European sanctions on Russia would increase if Moscow drags its feet. The European leaders also spoke by phone with U.S.President Donald Trumpafter their meeting. Starmer's office said the British prime minister "emphasized that the group had an unbreakable pledge to Ukraine, with President Trump's backing, and it was clear they now needed to go even further to apply pressure on Putin to secure a cessation of hostilities." Trump phone call Finnish President Alexander Stubb told Finnish media that, in the phone conversation with European leaders, Trump emphasized the need to put economic pressure on Russia, and said Europe must stop buying Russian oil and gas that he said was funding the war. Trump stressed that Russia received €1.1 billion in fuel sales from the EU in one year, according to a White House official. Trump also emphasized that European leaders must place economic pressure on China for indirectly funding Russia's war efforts, according to the official, who was not authorized to comment publicly about the private talks and spoke on the condition of anonymity. German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius said that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz laid out three "areas of action," including working toward a summit that would include Zelenskyy, and "a ceasefire must be agreed there." "If the Russian side continues to play for time, Europe will increase the pressure of sanctions to increase the chances of a diplomatic solution," the statement said. The Ukrainian president said a meeting with Putin is needed. "This is not a matter of a desire, this is a matter of necessity," Zelenskyy said. "We support any format, bilateral meeting, trilateral meeting, I believe that Russia does everything to defer it." There was no immediate reaction from Russian officials. Putin — isolated by Western leaders but backed by China in his war effort — said Wednesday that he believed "if common sense prevails, it is possible to agree on an acceptable option for ending the conflict," adding that Trump has "a sincere desire" to reach a settlement. Positive signals In a policy shift earlier this month, the U.S. sent positive signals over its readiness to support security guarantees for Ukraine that resemble NATO's collective defense mandate, Zelenskyy previously has said. It is unclear what that support would look like in practice. Ukraine is hoping for continued U.S. intelligence sharing and air support. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said that a broad coalition of nations is needed to support Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, but also to strengthen Europe to deter further military action by Moscow. Citing European military and intelligence officials who have warned of Russian plans to strike other European countries, Rutte said that "we have to make sure that our deterrence is such that they will never try, knowing that our reaction will be devastating." Rutte also called for the world to "not be naive about Russia." "We know what Putin tries to do and and the evidence is there in Ukraine as we speak," he said. Meanwhile, in Ukraine, Russia fired 112 strike and decoy drones across the country overnight Thursday, according to Ukraine's Air Force morning report. Air defenses intercepted or jammed 84 drones, the statement said. Russia on Thursday announced that it was expelling an Estonian diplomat in a tit-for-tat move after Estonia declared a Russian diplomat persona non grata last month. ___ Petrequin reported from London. Associated Press reporters from across the globe contributed to this report.

Macron says 26 countries pledge troops as a reassurance force for Ukraine after fighting ends

Macron says 26 countries pledge troops as a reassurance force for Ukraine after fighting ends KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — French President Emmanuel...
U.S. Supreme Court poised to resolve clashes over Trump's powerNew Foto - U.S. Supreme Court poised to resolve clashes over Trump's power

By Jan Wolfe and Andrew Chung WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump has pushed the boundaries of executive power to impose sweeping tariffs, crack down on immigration and attempt to fire a Federal Reserve governor, and these actions could dominate the U.S. Supreme Court's upcoming docket. "It's about to be, 'Does the president have the power to do that?' season at the Supreme Court," said Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson. "While each case brings up slightly different issues, when and if the Supreme Court tackles deportations, tariffs and the firing of members of executive agencies, the big question will be whether or not President Trump had the authority to take those actions." Trump's administration appealed on Wednesday a lower court's ruling last week that many of his tariffs pursued under a 1977 law meant for emergencies are illegal, urging the justices to fast track their review of the case. The case, and others making their way to the Supreme Court, will test just how amenable the justices are to the Republican president's expansive view of his authority, and his administration's ability to find novel ways to justify and carry out his agenda. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has already handed major wins to the Republican president in his second term, granting emergency requests to implement his policies while challenges play out in lower courts. The justices return in September from their summer recess and typically choose 60-70 appeals to hear. In the upcoming October to June term, they could rule on administration actions stemming from Trump's sweeping claims of executive power. "The scope of executive power has been - and will continue to be - the recurring legal issue of Trump's second term," said Robert Luther III, a George Mason University law professor. "And why wouldn't President Trump want it to be? The Supreme Court has consistently backed his muscular assertions of presidential power." TARIFFS The 7-4 decision on August 29 from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed what Trump calls "reciprocal" tariffs announced in April as well as other tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. At issue is whether Trump overstepped his authority in invoking the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose the tariffs, the first time the law was used for that purpose. Trump has made tariffs a pillar of U.S. foreign policy, employing them to exert political pressure and renegotiate trade deals with exporting countries. IMMIGRATION Trump's immigration policy has given rise to similar challenges. A New Orleans-based federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that Trump's reliance on a 1798 law to deport Venezuelan migrants accused of being gang members was likely unlawful. Historically, the law has been used only in wartime. The Alien Enemies Act expansively empowers the government to detain and deport citizens of hostile nations in times of war or during an "invasion or predatory incursion." The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the deportation of Venezuelan migrants under the law, rejecting the administration's view that the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua had made a "predatory incursion" on U.S. soil. This has been one of the few areas where the Supreme Court has pushed back on the administration so far. In May, the justices faulted his administration for seeking to remove Venezuelan migrants at a Texas detention center without adequate legal process. FED GOVERNOR COOK The limits of Trump's authority lie at the center of another case over his announcement last week he was removing Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, which sets U.S. monetary policy. Cook quickly filed a lawsuit seeking to block the move, setting up a legal battle that could upend long-established norms for the Fed's independence. The Trump administration has accused Cook, the first Black woman on the Fed board, of committing mortgage fraud, which she has denied. Cook also contends that, even if she made misstatements on mortgage applications, they do not give the president legal cause to remove her because she disclosed all the relevant information during her 2022 vetting. The case has major implications for the Federal Reserve's long-standing independence from political influence. OTHER CASES Trump's moves to eliminate diversity initiatives, withhold grants and other congressionally appropriated funds and target transgender individuals, among other contentious issues, have drawn hundreds of lawsuits - many of which are rapidly advancing through the appeals process. The Supreme Court has heard some of them on an emergency basis, as the administration fought attempts to stymie its policies while legal challenges continued. The court has sided with Trump in almost every case so far. In May, the Supreme Court let the administration end Biden-era temporary deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans as it put on hold a judge's ruling against the government. A San Francisco-based U.S. appeals court on August 29 upheld the judge's ruling, setting up a further appeal. In June the court allowed the administration to deport migrants to countries other than their own - including politically unstable South Sudan - without a chance to show the harms they could face. The court also backed Trump's firing of Democratic members of federal labor boards and the top consumer product safety watchdog, boosting his power over federal agencies that Congress established as independent from presidential control. The court also permitted implementation of his ban on transgender people in the military in May. (Reporting by Jan Wolfe in Washington and Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Amy Stevens and Cynthia Osterman)

U.S. Supreme Court poised to resolve clashes over Trump's power

U.S. Supreme Court poised to resolve clashes over Trump's power By Jan Wolfe and Andrew Chung WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Tru...
Texas-Ohio State sets records for Week 1 viewershipNew Foto - Texas-Ohio State sets records for Week 1 viewership

The season-opening clash between Ohio State and Texas attracted 16.62 million viewers, the most ever to watch a Week 1 college football game, Fox Sports reported. Ohio State, then ranked No. 3, defeated then-top-ranked Texas 14-7 in the debut of Longhorns quarterback Arch Manning as the team's full-time starter. Fox said the game peaked at 18.6 million viewers from 3-3:15 p.m. ET, adding it was the third most-watched college game ever in the regular season on Fox. Even the pregame shows were a hit among viewers. Fox reported that its "Big Noon Kickoff" drew 3.8 million people beginning at 11 a.m. ET, making it the most-watched edition of the show when Ohio State and Michigan weren't following it. ESPN said earlier this week that its "College GameDay" show, which featured the final appearance of the retiring analyst Lee Corso. ESPN averaged 3.5 million viewers during the show on Saturday, preliminary Nielsen ratings show. It was broadcast from Columbus, Ohio. The ratings for the final 15 minutes of the show reached a record 5.1 million viewers, per ESPN. That's the section of the show during which Corso famously made his prediction -- who would win the game to be played in the city from which "College GameDay" was airing -- by putting on headgear representing his predicted victor. On Saturday, he correctly chose the Buckeyes. --Field Level Media

Texas-Ohio State sets records for Week 1 viewership

Texas-Ohio State sets records for Week 1 viewership The season-opening clash between Ohio State and Texas attracted 16.62 million viewers, t...
Raiders owner Mark Davis says Tom Brady was 'supposed to be here in 2020' as team pursued QB in free agencyNew Foto - Raiders owner Mark Davis says Tom Brady was 'supposed to be here in 2020' as team pursued QB in free agency

Tom Brady could have been a part of the Las Vegas Raiders years before he becamea minority owner in 2024, according owner Mark Davis. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] In aninterview on the Raiders' websitewith former NBA star Baron Davis, Mark Davis told a story about how he wanted to sign Brady in 2020 when the New England Patriots great was a free agent. Jon Gruden and Mike Mayock, the head coach and general manager at the time, had a different opinion about who their quarterback should be for that season — Derek Carr. "He was supposed to be here in 2020," Davis said. "That's when our relationship started, was in 2020 when he was a free agent and we talked about him coming here to play quarterback. Obviously, it was a tough decision for him, he was close to wanting to come here, but the head coach and general manager decided they wanted to go in a different direction. So, we didn't sign him, but as I got to know him through that process, I let his agent know that when he was done playing that I would like him to be a part of our organization and let him know." Brady recounted his free agent experience speaking to the Raiders on a 2021 episode of "The Shop" where he said, "There was a story in free agency, one of the teams, they were interested and all of a sudden they weren't interested at the very end. I was sitting there thinking, 'You're sticking with that motherf******? Are you serious?'" In Aug. 2022, UFC presidentDana White revealedhe had brokered a deal for both Brady and Rob Gronkowski to go to the Raiders, but that Gruden "blew the deal up." Brady would sign with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and win a seventh Super Bowl in 2020. The following year he would throw for a career-best 5,316 yards and reach the 40-touchdown mark for only the third time. After his third season with the Buccaneers, Brady's Hall of Fame career would come to an end and two years later he would join Davis with the Raiders' ownership group. The Raiders would go with Carr for the next three seasons and record a 26-26 record with one playoff appearance — a Wild Card round loss to the Cincinnati Bengals. The Buccaneers would make the postseason all three years Brady was there and compile a 32-18 record with two division titles.

Raiders owner Mark Davis says Tom Brady was 'supposed to be here in 2020' as team pursued QB in free agency

Raiders owner Mark Davis says Tom Brady was 'supposed to be here in 2020' as team pursued QB in free agency Tom Brady could have bee...
Balance of power between Trump and Senate Republicans in focus at high-profile hearingsNew Foto - Balance of power between Trump and Senate Republicans in focus at high-profile hearings

By David Morgan WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The balance of power between Senate Republicans and President Donald Trump's White House will be on public display on Thursday at a pair of hearings, where lawmakers are expected to grapple with Trump advisers over the credibility of U.S. vaccine policy and the independence of the Federal Reserve. U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will appear before the Senate Finance Committee, a week after the Trump administration fired Susan Monarez as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention over her refusal to follow Kennedy's limitations on vaccine availability, which she believed were unscientific.  Four other top CDC officials resigned in protest, raising warnings from experts that the health of the American public could be at risk. White House economic adviser Stephen Miran, Trump's nominee to fill a vacancy on the Fed board that unexpectedly opened last month, will come before the Senate Banking Committee for his confirmation hearing after weeks of attacks by Trump on Fed Chair Jerome Powell and an effort to fire board Governor Lisa Cook. The hearings will occur as some Senate Republicans are beginning to chafe at Trump's efforts to extend his control over federal spending by rescinding previously allocated funding. Lawmakers say those efforts could endanger hopes of a bipartisan effort to avert a government shutdown. "I'm a big believer that senators have to stand up for the institution of the Senate. And there are a number of the administration's goals I agree with. It's the means that I question," said Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who announced his retirement in June after clashing with Trump over spending cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for lower-income Americans. "I do have some pause when some of my colleagues don't recognize the institutional threat that that represents. We've got to fight back, and not make it look like it's some sort of freaking loyalty pledge," he added. Since Trump took office in January, some Senate Republicans have aired criticism of the administration and opposed its legislative priorities on the chamber floor. But given the strength of Trump's grip on the Republican Party, they have not been willing to stand in his way. NOMINEE BACKLOG On Wednesday, Senate Republicans met over lunch to debate a plan to relinquish more of their constitutional advice and consent authority over presidential nominees in an effort to overcome Democratic opposition and confirm scores of Trump's sub-cabinet appointees. "Expect us to move forward with a plan that would enable us to clear the backlog of nominees. It just flat has to happen," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters after the meeting. Democrats warned that Republicans are unlikely to confront Kennedy over disarray at the CDC and uncertainty over vaccine policies for diseases including COVID. "Republicans should put the health of the American people ahead of politics," Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren told reporters. "RFK will cost lives, and that will be on him and Donald Trump and the Republicans." When Kennedy appears, one Republican lawmaker in particular is expected to command attention. That is Senate Health, Education Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, who was key to his confirmation. Cassidy, a medical doctor, made it clear last week's departures from the CDC were on his mind. "He and the president have both committed to radical transparency, and I've learned in relationships -  however they are - there's always two sides to the story," the Louisiana Republican told Reuters. "There's some pretty significant allegations by the people who departed CDC. We need to hear from him, why those allegations aren't true. If they're true, it's disturbing." Cassidy did not specify the allegations. But officials who resigned told Reuters Kennedy appointees were making vaccine recommendations before reviewing data, among other allegations. Other Republicans seemed prepared to champion Kennedy, who has a long history of sowing doubt about vaccine safety. "I always supported what Secretary Kennedy has done in the firing of the CDC director, and I'm actually glad the people that resigned have resigned. I think that they've been part of the problem," said Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas, also a physician. "President Trump chose Secretary Kennedy because he is a disruptor, and that's what we need to see in this country," he said. Independent analysts say Trump chose Miran for the Fed board as part of his effort to exert control over the Fed and lower interest rates, a policy he has endorsed. But Republicans who have spoken out in favor of Fed independence said Miran is likely to win confirmation. "I think he's going to make it very clear that he will be an independent voice," said Republican Senator Mike Rounds, a member of the Senate Banking Committee. Rounds, of South Dakota, said Miran agreed in their meeting that the Fed board should also be independent, adding, "I think he's going to have a pretty good shot at actually being confirmed." (Reporting by David Morgan; editing by Scott Malone and Rod Nickel)

Balance of power between Trump and Senate Republicans in focus at high-profile hearings

Balance of power between Trump and Senate Republicans in focus at high-profile hearings By David Morgan WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The balance of...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com