Agency that handles green cards and citizenship to hire armed agents who can make arrestsNew Foto - Agency that handles green cards and citizenship to hire armed agents who can make arrests

The Trump administration announced Thursday that the agency that assesseswhether immigrants should be granted green cardsand citizenship will add its own law enforcement agents who can carry firearms and make arrests. The move is a major change forU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, an agency that has been kept separate from immigration arrests and enforcing deportations. USCIS assesses applications and interviews immigrants seeking to legally remain in the country by getting green cards,becoming naturalized citizensor being approved for humanitarian programs. USCIS said in a statement Thursday that under the new rule, it will be authorized to add "special agents" who "will be empowered to investigate, arrest, and present for prosecution those who violate America's immigration laws." The final rule by the Trump administration will be effective 30 days from its publication, it said. In the rule,Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noemgrants the agency the right to hire agents who can make arrests, carry firearms, execute search and arrest warrants and who will have "other powers standard for federal law enforcement," USCIS said in the statement. N.H. green card holder denied re-entry to U.S. after visiting native Canada L.A. business owner says his wife, detained by ICE, had green card and passed citizenship exam German national with U.S. green card detained at ICE facility, family says "USCIS has always been an enforcement agency. By upholding the integrity of our immigration system, we enforce the laws of this nation," USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said in the statement. "This historic moment will better address immigration crimes, hold those that perpetrate immigration fraud accountable, and act as a force multiplier for DHS and our federal law enforcement partners, including the Joint Terrorism Task Force." The agency said in its statement that "USCIS will be able to more efficiently clear its backlogs of aliens who seek to exploit our immigration system through fraud, prosecute them, and remove them from the country." Edlow toldThe Wall Street Journal, which first reported on the change, that the agency plans to train several hundred federal law special agents who would look for immigration fraud in applications and could arrest immigrants or lawyers found to have engaged in fraud. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement Thursday that the rule will allow USCIS to "thoroughly fulfill its national security, fraud detection, and public safety missions related to immigration adjudications." Doug Rand, a former USCIS senior official during the Biden administration, said the agency has long been investigating fraud in applications. "They don't carry firearms, and they've been doing fine for decades," he said of its agents. "This move that is calculated at best to scare people and at worst is a really dangerous escalation of law enforcement that's completely unnecessary and uncalled for at USCIS," he said. "USCIS should be fairly adjudicating people's applications for services. It should not be scaring people from applying for services in the first place," he said. Jason Houser, who held senior Department of Homeland Security positions during the Obama and Biden administrations, told NBC News the administration wants "enforcement to be where the benefits used to be. That's the goal." Houser said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been arresting people outside USCIS facilities and that the new rule would put those arrests "in house." The rule creates a feeling that "there's no place now for migrants to feel like they have an environment to seek refuge, to seek a legal pathway, without there being potentially immediate consequences for arrest or detention," he said. Advocates are extremely concerned about a "chilling effect on eligible people to come forward" and seek to adjust their immigration statuses, said Nicole Melaku, the executive director of National Partnership for New Americans, a coalition of immigrant and refugee rights organizations. "This shift in allowing armed agents and having a whole new enforcement apparatus connected to USCIS is deeply alarming," she said. The Trump administration is seeking new ways tomassively increase immigration enforcement operationswith the goal of deporting 1 million immigrants a year. Other recent changes at the agency heighten scrutiny for immigrant applicants. In a memorandum last month,USCIS said it would resume "neighborhood investigations,"which could include interviews with applicants' neighbors and co-workers, a practice that was waived in 1991. USCIS also updated guidance in its policy handbook in August to review and consider any "anti-American ideologies or activities," including on social media, in deciding whether to issue immigration benefits to people. "Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," the guidance said. Melaku said the changes create "more barriers for people's entry points" to remain legally in the United States. "The desire here is to intimidate people away from accessing the process and instilling fear and mistrust in an agency that has been traditionally tasked with being seen as a public good," she said.

Agency that handles green cards and citizenship to hire armed agents who can make arrests

Agency that handles green cards and citizenship to hire armed agents who can make arrests The Trump administration announced Thursday that t...
Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchupNew Foto - Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchup

In recent months, California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has been acting a lot like a presidential candidate-in-waiting. He'sset up fundraising committees. He'svisited key battleground states. He'shosted national political players on his podcast. He'smocked President Trump on social media. And he's convinced the California Legislature to "fight fire with fire" bymatching Texas's partisan redistricting push. "It's not about whether we play hardball anymore," the governor recently told his fellow Democratic officials. "It's about how we play hardball." And now Newsom's new brand of hardball has coincided with a rise in poll support — at least when it comes to boosting his own political brand. According to the latest Yahoo/YouGov poll, Newsom has surged to the front of the Democratic Party's 2028 presidential primary pack, with 21% of registered Democratic voters and registered voters who lean Democratic now picking him as their preferred nominee. That puts Newsom slightly ahead of former Vice President Kamala Harris (19%), the party's 2024 nominee and perhaps the most familiar name on the list — and well ahead of New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (12%), former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (10%), Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (7%), Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (4%), Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (4%) and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (2%). The survey of 1,690 U.S. adults, which was conducted from Aug. 29 to Sept. 2, also finds that if the 2028 general election were "held today," 49% of registered voters say they would cast their ballots for Newsom — while only 41% say they would choose Trump. Trump, of course, is constitutionally prohibited from running for a third term. But Newsom (49%) leads Vice President JD Vance (41%) by 8 points as well. Caveats apply here. For one thing, the 2028 contest won't start in earnest for another 16 months; hypothetical matchups this far out are not — and never have been — predictive. For another, the Yahoo/YouGov poll didn't pair President Trump or Vance with other potential Democratic challengers, so it's impossible to say whether Newsom is performing better or worse than the alternatives. It's clear, however, that Newsom's recent turn in the national spotlight has changed how Democrats see him. While this is the first time the Yahoo/YouGov poll has asked the party's voters who they would prefer as their 2028 nominee, an Economist/YouGov poll posed a similar question in April, asking which candidate would be "your ideal choice?" In that survey — conducted before the California redistricting push — Newsom registered at 8%, on par with Buttigieg (9%), Ocasio-Cortez (7%) and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (6%). In contrast, 29% of Democrats opted for Harris. According to the new Yahoo/YouGov poll, overall perceptions of Newsom as a politician are not that different from overall views of Trump. As befitting the Californian's lower national profile, more Americans say they're "not sure" what to think of him — but the usual partisan polarization is very much in effect among those whodoknow what they think. Newsom's overall favorable rating is 31% favorable to 41% unfavorable, with Democrats mostly positive (62% favorable, 14% unfavorable), Republicans even more negative (7% favorable, 66% unfavorable) and independents net negative (32% favorable, 43% unfavorable). Trump's overall favorable rating is 42% favorable to 56% unfavorable, with Republicans mostly positive (89% favorable, 10% unfavorable), Democrats even more negative (4% favorable, 94% unfavorable) and independents net negative (34% favorable, 65% unfavorable). Likewise, 32% of Americans say Newsom is focused on California and America's most important problems, while 41% say he is focused on less important issues (and 27% are unsure). For Trump, 39% say he is focused on America's most important problems, while 50% say he is focused on less important issues (and 10% are unsure). Yet for the moment, at least, Americans seem to view Newsom's redistricting countermeasures more favorably than the president's own moves in that area. U.S. House redistricting efforts — the process of redrawing the boundaries of each district — typically take place every 10 years, after each new census reveals changes in population distribution. But last month, Trump encouragedRepublican legislators in Texas to pass new congressional district boundariesfive years earlier than normal to help Republicans win five additional U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. In response, Newsom similarly backed an effort by Democratic legislators in California to create new congressional district boundaries five years earlier than normal to help Democrats win five additional U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. To be sure, redistricting itself — defined for poll respondents as "the practice by which politicians redraw congressional districts to help their own party win" — has few fans. Just 11% of Americans say they favor it; 58% are opposed. Democrats in particular are anti-redistricting (5% favor, 73% oppose, 23% not sure); Republicans are more divided (23% favor, 36% oppose, 41% not sure). Yet while just 25% of Americans approve (and 49% disapprove) of Trump's recent redistricting push in Texas, the numbers for Newsom's response in California are significantly closer: 33% approve to 39% disapprove. Similarly, only 22% of Americans say they approve of Trump's overall approach to redistricting — described for respondents as him "prais[ing] Texas over its redistrictingwhile saying he willsue California over redistricting there." A majority (54%) disapproves. In contrast, more Americans approve (39%) than disapprove (37%) of Newsom's approach: saying "Democrats need to 'play hardball' in California and elsewhere in response to the Trump administration's efforts to 'advance Republicans' power.'" Why the difference? The poll shows that Democratic disapproval of Trump's Texas redistricting push (80%) is significantly higher than Republican opposition to Newsom's California response (56%) — and Republican support for what Trump is doing in Texas (56%) is modestly lower than Democratic support for what Newsom is doing in California (62%). This partisan asymmetry skews overall approval in favor of Newsom's efforts. Despite his improving numbers, the new Yahoo/YouGov survey highlights three possible risks for Newsom going forward. First, more Americans see Trump as a "stronger leader" (44%) than Newsom (32%) — largely because the number of Republicans who view the president that way (91%) is much higher than the number of Democrats who say the same about his California counterpart (66%). Second, younger Democrats and Democratic leaners — adults under 45 — prefer both Harris (27%) and Ocasio-Cortez (22%) to Newsom (13%) as a potential 2028 presidential nominee. Newsom's strength is largely concentrated among Democrats over 45, among whom he leads Harris 26% to 13%. Finally, Newsom's recent shift in social media strategy is not especially popular. When told in the poll that "Newsom and his team have started to satirize Donald Trump's social media presence, imitating his aggressive, all-caps style, mocking his looks and his masculinity and accusing him of cheating to win," just 33% of respondents said they approve; 43% said they disapprove. One bright spot here for the governor? Trump's own use of social media is even less popular, with just 29% of Americans saying they approve and a majority — 52% — saying they disapprove. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,690 U.S. adults interviewed online from Aug. 29 to Sept. 2, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%.

Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchup

Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchup In recent months, California's Democrati...
Week 1 NFL Preview: Hoss fight in Green Bay, Stroud vs. Stafford, Raiders-Patriots slop watchNew Foto - Week 1 NFL Preview: Hoss fight in Green Bay, Stroud vs. Stafford, Raiders-Patriots slop watch

Week 1 is finally here, and Nate Tice & Charles McDonald are here to deep dive on the biggest games of the week. Nate and Charles kick things off by getting Lost in the Sauce with their three deep dives of the week, featuring the Houston Texans taking on the Los Angeles Rams, a hoss fight of a matchup with Green Bay Packers vs. Detroit Lions and the Baltimore Ravens taking on the Buffalo Bills on Sunday night. Later, Nate & Charles reveal their Slop Watch: the New England Patriots vs. Las Vegas Raiders, where two quarterbacks will try to take advantage of sketchy secondary play. Nate & Charles wrap things up with their Locks of the Week, where they make a Week 1 bold prediction they're sure will come true. (3:20) - Texans @ Rams preview (18:30) - Lions @ Packers preview (34:20) - Ravens @ Bills preview (49:05) - Slop Watch: Raiders @ Patriots (58:30) - Locks of the Week 🖥️Watch thisfull episode on YouTube Check out the rest of the Yahoo Sports podcast family athttps://apple.co/3zEuTQjor atYahoo Sports Podcasts

Week 1 NFL Preview: Hoss fight in Green Bay, Stroud vs. Stafford, Raiders-Patriots slop watch

Week 1 NFL Preview: Hoss fight in Green Bay, Stroud vs. Stafford, Raiders-Patriots slop watch Week 1 is finally here, and Nate Tice & Ch...
Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practicesNew Foto - Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices

One of the greatestNFLhead coaches of all time is also being petty. North Carolina head football coachBill Belichickhas banned New England Patriots scouts from attendingTar Heelspractices, a person with direct knowledge of the situation confirmed to USA TODAY Sports. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. Podcaster John Middlekauff was first to report the story. The banned access message was sent by North Carolina football general manager Mike Lombardi. The Patriots and Belichick "mutually" parted ways after the 2023 season. Belichick won six Super Bowl titles during his 24 seasons in New England, but the franchise saw a steep decline during his final two years – finishing below .500 in each of his last two seasons. North Carolina hired Belichick to become the school's head coach in December of 2024. North Carolina head coach Bill Belichick stares from the sideline after his Tar Heels' debut ended in a 48-14 defeat to the TCU Horned Frogs. Belichick's time in Chapel Hill has gotten off to a rocky start. The Tar Heels were trounced by TCU 48-14 in their nationally televised season opener at home with the likes of Michael Jordan and Lawrence Taylor in attendance. There was a noticeable discrepancy in talent between the two college football programs. And now, at least Patriots scouts, aren't permitted to view North Carolina's players who are attempting to play in the NFL. Follow USA TODAY Sports' Tyler Dragon on X@TheTylerDragon. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices

Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices

Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices One of the greatestNFLhead coaches of all time is also being petty. North C...
What the FBI took during search of John Bolton's houseNew Foto - What the FBI took during search of John Bolton's house

A federal magistrate judge revealedthat the FBI removed computers, other electronics and documentsduring a searchofJohn Bolton's house and that PresidentDonald Trump's former national security adviser is under investigation for possible violations of the Espionage Act. However, U.S. Magistrate Judge Timothy Sullivan kept confidential a court document that details what investigators were hoping to find when they searched his house Aug. 22. Bolton, who served duringTrump's first term and has since become a vocal critic of the administration, has not been charged in connection with the matter. More:Exclusive: John Bolton says Trump's White House was 'like living inside a pinball machine' The belongings seized as Bolton's Maryland home included two iPhones, typed documents in folders labeled Trump I to IV, white binders labeled reflections on "allied strikes," a Dell 3620 computer, a Dell 2330 computer, a Dell laptop and a couple of USB drives, according to a filing by Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Sullivan that was posted on the public docket Sept. 4. The prosecutor said that greater disclosure could jeopardize the integrity of the investigation. Bolton is under investigation for possible violations of two federal laws: for gathering defense information and for unauthorized retention of classified documents, according to Sullivan's filing. The first statute, which is part of the Espionage Act, involves what Trump was charged with in 2023 after leaving the White House and keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Afederal judge dismissed the document chargesagainst Trump. Prosecutors dropped their appeal after Trump was elected president a second time, under alongstanding Justice Department policyagainst prosecuting a sitting president. Bolton resumed criticizing Trumpin an op-ed on Aug. 25 in theWashington Examinerthat mentioned the investigation. "Donald Trump's Ukraine policy today is no more coherent than it was last Friday when his administration executed search warrants against my home and office,"Bolton wrote, repeating thesame line in a post on X. "Collapsing in confusion and haste, Trump's negotiations may be in their last throes, along with his Nobel Peace Prize campaign." Trump told reporters Bolton was "a lowlife" but that he didn't know about the search beforehand.Vice President JD Vance told USA TODAYthat Bolton was under investigation for classified documents rather than politics. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Here's what FBI removed in search of John Bolton's house

What the FBI took during search of John Bolton's house

What the FBI took during search of John Bolton's house A federal magistrate judge revealedthat the FBI removed computers, other electron...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com