Justice Department talks about banning transgender gun owners spark fury across political spectrumNew Foto - Justice Department talks about banning transgender gun owners spark fury across political spectrum

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department is drawing swift condemnation from gun rights groups and LGBTQ advocates alike after floating that it was considering restricting transgender people from owning guns — a move that would all but certainly face immediate constitutional challenges if ever implemented. The discussions come in the wake ofthe shooting at a Minneapolis Catholic schoollast month that federal officials have said was carried out by a transgender shooter, according to a person familiar with the matter. The person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, cautioned that the talks were in the early stages and that no proposal has been finalized. Even so, that high-level officials in theTrumpadministration were discussing such an idea sparked fury across the political spectrum. LGBTQ advocates called it misguided and dangerous as the vast majority of mass shootings in the U.S. are carried out by men and do not involve transgender people. "Transgender people are less than 2% of the overall population, yet four times as likely to be victims of crime," GLAAD said in an email. "Everyone deserves to be themselves, be safe, and be free from violence and discrimination. We all deserve leaders who prioritize keeping all of us safe and free." Since Trump returned to office, his administration has targeted transgender people in several ways, including removing them frommilitary service, scrubbing somefederal websitesof mentions of them, trying to bar changing the sex marker onpassports, seekingpersonal informationon gender-affirming care patients from doctors and clinics, and seeking to bar transgender girls and women from certainsports competitions. The Justice Department said in a statement in response to questions about the firearms talks that the agency is "actively evaluating options to prevent the pattern of violence we have seen from individuals with specific mental health challenges and substance abuse disorders." But, the department said: "No specific criminal justice proposals have been advanced at this time." Some conservative figures have coalesced around the idea of restricting guns for people diagnosed with gender dysphoria — the unease a person may have because their assigned gender and gender identity don't match — through a federal law that bars people from possessing firearms if they are "adjudicated as a mental defective." "It's incredibly worrying that that seems to be on the table for them," Alejandra Caraballo, a transgender rights activist and Harvard Law School instructor. "This is not something that would be that incredibly difficult to do logistically or practically but it would be politically explosive in terms of the backlash of Second Amendment groups." Guns rights advocates — including politically powerful groups such as the National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America — vowed to fight any proposal that imposes a blanket gun ban targeting a segment of the population. "The Second Amendment isn't up for debate," the NRA said in a social media post on Friday. "NRA does not, and will not, support any policy proposals that implement sweeping guns bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process." Another gun rights group, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, called the discussions "disturbing." "Prohibiting whole groups of people from owning and using firearms because a sick individual misused a gun to harm and kill children is as reprehensible as restricting the rights of all law-abiding citizens because some people have committed crimes," said Alan Gottlieb, the group's chairman said in a statement. "That anyone in the Trump administration would consider such nonsense is alarming." ____ Associated Press reporter Geoff Mulvihill in Philadelphia contributed.

Justice Department talks about banning transgender gun owners spark fury across political spectrum

Justice Department talks about banning transgender gun owners spark fury across political spectrum WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department ...
US Attorney Jeanine Pirro in war of words with judge over Trump's DC crackdownNew Foto - US Attorney Jeanine Pirro in war of words with judge over Trump's DC crackdown

Jeanine Pirro, the top federal prosecutor for Washington, D.C., is embroiled in an ongoing war of words with a magistrate judge who has recently leveled biting criticism against prosecutors for bringing cases he says lack evidence in their attempt to support President Donald Trump's aggressivecrime crackdownin the district. Pirro took aim during a Friday news conference at Judge Zia Faruqui for comments Faruqui made during a Thursday hearing lambasting prosecutors for a recent spate of cases the U.S. attorney's office has been forced to drop due to grand juries refusing to indict defendants charged with offenses ranging from weapons possession to purported threats against President Trump. "Judge Faruqui has never really met someone with an illegal gun that he hasn't found some compassion for, OK?" Pirro said. "I'm not going into grand juries and telling him what to do and what not to do. That is their prerogative. We are advisers to grand juries. We tell them what the law is. We present cases that are clearly based on the evidence, OK?" Trump puts DC police department under federal control, deploys National Guard It's extremely rare for grand juries to refuse to hand up indictments in the federal system, but it has happened in at least seven separate instances across five cases since Trump ordered his surge of federal resources to Washington roughly a month ago, according to a tally by theAssociated Press. In a hearing Thursday, Faruqui, according to the AP, accused prosecutors of "playing cops and robbers" on the streets of D.C. while the "rule of law" was "bring flushed down the toilet" in order to puff up numbers for the Justice Department and FBI to claim theirfederal interventionin the district has proved effective. The comments led Pirro to issue an usual statement taking aim at Faruqui, one of several magistrate judges in D.C. who directly oversee prosecutors' activities -- including signing off on search warrants and arrests of suspects. Pirro issued a similar statement earlier in the week taking direct aim at a grand jury which had refused to bring an indictment against a suspect her office had charged with leveling threats against President Trump. Pirro again echoed her criticisms Friday in response to a question from a reporter who asked whether her office plans to change its approach to avoid such setbacks in the future. "As far as I'm concerned, our job, my job as a prosecutor, is to bring criminals into court and to try to prove my case beyond a reasonable doubt. I'm not into going back and forth with judges," Pirro said. "I was a judge, OK? That's not what I did as a judge. So we need to leave politics out of it." "I'll do my job. He should do his job as a judge and leave his politics out of it," Pirro said.

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro in war of words with judge over Trump's DC crackdown

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro in war of words with judge over Trump's DC crackdown Jeanine Pirro, the top federal prosecutor for Washington,...
Is Taylor Swift at the Chiefs game tonight? Latest ahead of Chiefs-Chargers in BrazilNew Foto - Is Taylor Swift at the Chiefs game tonight? Latest ahead of Chiefs-Chargers in Brazil

Friday night's game between theKansas City ChiefsandLos Angeles Chargershas a little extra intrigue this time around. Fans across the globe are patiently waiting to see if a global superstar makes an appearance tonight – no, notTravis Kelce. While Kelce is certainly eager to be putting a disappointing 2024 campaign behind him, all eyes are instead fixated on his other half –Taylor Swift. The pop star has become afixture at Chiefs gamessince her relationship began with Kelce two seasons ago. Her presence and the emphasis on it has drawn mixed reactions, but there's no doubt that Swift will be a talking point on Friday night in Sao Paulo. Swift traveled for multiple games during her first season with Kelce, but only attended home games in 2024 before making the trip toSuper Bowl 59in New Orleans. With the pair havingrecently announced their engagement, it begs the question – will Swift attend the NFL's Brazil game? Here's what to know. Pop star Taylor Swift and Chiefs tight end Travis Kelceannounced their engagement on Aug. 26, 2025. The couple began dating in the summer of 2023. Look back at their time together, including here, at the game between Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers during the Stanley Cup Final at Amerant Bank Arena on June 12, 2025, in Sunrise, Fla. Swift's attendance for the Chiefs game against the Chargers has not been confirmed for Friday night. It may not seem like a big deal, but Kelce's fiancée's attendance seems to indicate a trend in his performance over the last two seasons. The star tight end seems to get a boost when Swift is around, but it is notably that she missed both games against the rival Chargers in 2024. During the 2023 season, Kelce recorded 12 catches and 179 yards in Week 7, both season-highs. He also added a touchdown in what has been, statistically, one of the best games of Kelce's career and certainly his best since this relationship began. Here's a breakdown of his stats with and without her in attendance. Week 3 vs.Bears: Seven catches for 69 yards and one touchdown Week 4 at Jets: Six catches for 60 yards Week 6 vs.Broncos: Nine catches for 124 yards Week 7 vs. Chargers: 12 catches (season-high) for 179 yards (season-high) and a touchdown Week 13 at Packers: Four catches for 81 yards Week 14 vs. Bills: Six catches for 83 yards Week 15 at Patriots: Five catches for 28 yards Week 16 vs.Raiders: Five catches for 44 yards Week 17 vs. Bengals: Three catches for 16 yards Wild-card round vs. Dolphins: Seven catches for 71 yards Divisional round vs. Bills: Five catches, 75 yards, two touchdowns AFC championship game vs.Ravens: 11 catches, 116 yards, touchdown Super Bowl 58 vs. 49ers: Nine catches, 93 yards The Chiefs finished with a 10-3 record with Swift around in 2023, including a Super Bowl victory against the San Francisco 49ers. Week 1 vs. Ravens: three catches, 34 yards Week 2 vs. Bengals: one catch, 5 yards Week 5 vs. Saints: nine catches, 70 yards Week 9 vs. Buccaneers: 14 catches, 100 yards Week 10 vs. Broncos: eight catches, 64 yards and one touchdown Week 13 vs. Raiders: seven catches, 68 yards Week 16 vs. Texans: five catches, 30 yards Divisional round vs. Texans: seven catches, 117 yards and one touchdown AFC championship vs. Bills: two catches, 19 yards Super Bowl 59 vs. Eagles: four catches, 39 yards The Chiefs were 9-1 during the 2024 season with Swift in the building, with the only loss coming in Super Bowl 59 to thePhiladelphia Eagles. Kansas City owns a 19-4 record all-time when she's in the crowd. Week 5 at Vikings: 10 catches, 67 yards and one touchdown Week 8 at Broncos: six catches, 58 yards Week 9 vs. Dolphins: three catches, 14 yards Week 11 vs. Eagles: seven catches, 44 yards and one touchdown Week 12 at Raiders: six catches, 91 yards Swift didn't begin attending Chiefs games until Week 3 of the 2023 NFL season, going 3-2 without the music star in attendance. Kelce was inactive during the Chiefs' Week 1 and 18 contests, joining the Week 2 game as the three that didn't make the cut Week 3 vs. Falcons: four catches, 30 yards Week 4 vs. Chargers: seven catches, 89 yards Week 7 vs. 49ers: four catches, 17 yards Week 8 vs. Raiders: 10 catches, 90 yards and one touchdown Week 11 vs. Bills: two catches, 8 yards Week 12 vs. Panthers: six catches, 62 yards Week 14 vs. Chargers: five catches, 45 yards Week 15 vs. Browns: four catches, 27 yards Week 17 vs. Steelers: eight catches, 84 yards and one touchdown Kansas City was 8-1 when Swift wasn't around and Kelce played in 2024. The Chiefs are 12-3 in that situation dating back to the 2023 season. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Will Taylor Swift be in attendance for Chiefs-Chargers in Brazil?

Is Taylor Swift at the Chiefs game tonight? Latest ahead of Chiefs-Chargers in Brazil

Is Taylor Swift at the Chiefs game tonight? Latest ahead of Chiefs-Chargers in Brazil Friday night's game between theKansas City Chiefsa...
Why New York Mets sent Kodai Senga to minor leaguesNew Foto - Why New York Mets sent Kodai Senga to minor leagues

With the Mets choosing to go with three young pitchers to fill out their starting rotation, including Brandon Sproat who will debut on Sunday, something had to give with the regular contributors. On Friday afternoon, the Mets made the call, getting the approval and optioning the struggling Kodai Senga to Triple-A Syracuse, the team announced. In a subsequent move, the Mets also activated Francisco Alvarez, who has been working back from a UCL sprain in his right hand and a broken left pinky. This season, Senga is 7-6 with a 3.02 ERA, 1.32 WHIP and 109 strikeouts in 113⅓ innings, but those stats don't tell the whole story. Since the 32-year-old right-hander returned from the injured list after a month on the injured list with a right hamstring strain, he is 0-3 with a 5.90 ERA and a 1.69 WHIP. With several members of the Mets starting rotation tormented by an inability to get deep into games, Senga has been one of the chief culprits. Since the calendar turned to June, Senga has tossed five innings or more three times in nine starts. Before landing on the IL, Senga boasted a National League-best 1.47 ERA while 12 of his 13 starts were at least five innings. His strikeout-to-walk ratio was 2.35, compared to 1.85 since his return. The Mets have also had to be cautious with Senga's workload since he debuted since coming over from Japan's Nippon Professional Baseball in 2023. He has pitched on regular rest just once this season. The decision to send down Senga, which needed to be approved by the right-hander, will allow him to work on his mechanics to produce a little more power behind his pitches and more swing-and-miss stuff. The velocity is down on all of Senga's pitches since he returned from missing nearly all of the 2024 season with a shoulder capsule and calf strains. This article originally appeared on NorthJersey.com:Kodai Senga demoted: Mets send struggling pitcher to AAA

Why New York Mets sent Kodai Senga to minor leagues

Why New York Mets sent Kodai Senga to minor leagues With the Mets choosing to go with three young pitchers to fill out their starting rotati...
Republicans Say Gmail Is Blocking Their Fundraising Emails. We Recreated Their Test To See If That's True.New Foto - Republicans Say Gmail Is Blocking Their Fundraising Emails. We Recreated Their Test To See If That's True.

Despitea defeat in federal court on Tuesday, the Trump administration's antitrust enforcers are still going after Google. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Andrew Ferguson sent Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google's parent company, Alphabet, an email last week notifying him that "Alphabet may be engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices," which would violate theFTC Actand justify federal antitrust enforcement. In hisemailto Pichai, Ferguson says it's his "understanding from recent reporting" that Gmail is "routinely block[ing] messages…from Republican senders but fail[ing] to block similar messages sent by Democrats." He specifies that "Alphabet's alleged partisan treatment of comparable messages or messengers in Gmail to achieve political objectives may violate" Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices. But the "recent reporting" that Ferguson cites does not support his missive. The chairman's primary citation is a recentNew York Postarticle, which claims Google was caught "flagging Republican fundraising emails as 'dangerous' spam—keeping them from hitting Gmail users' inboxes—while leaving similar solicitations from Democrats untouched" (emphasis added). ThePostarticle is based on a memo obtained from Targeted Victory, a Republican digital strategy firm. From this memo, thePostshared Targeted Victory'sunlisted YouTube video, which shows one of two nearly identical emails being flagged. ThePostimprecisely reports that "the only difference being that one contained a WinRed donation link and the other contained an ActBlue link." If you watch the video closely, you will notice that the emails' hyperlinks do not direct to the WinRed or the ActBlue campaigns. Instead, the "WR Hyperlink Test" email includes a link to aGoogle Docthat itself has a link toa WinRed website. Likewise, the "AB Hyperlink Test" email includes a link to a different Google Doc that links toan ActBlue website. The video shows only the "WR Hyperlink Test" email being accompanied by a warning banner that, upon opening, reads, "This message seems dangerous." The banner prompts the recipient to choose between "Report spam" and "Looks safe." Still,neithermessage was prevented "from hitting Gmail users' inboxes," like Ferguson says, and thePostreported. Though Targeted Victory claims "many cases" of Gmail sending emails containing WinRed links "directly to spam," the video fails to furnish a single example. Moreover, whenReasonrecreated Targeted Victory's video exactly, neither email was flagged. WhenReasonsent emails actually including WinRed and ActBlue links—instead of Google Doc links—the result was the same: Neither email was flagged.The Tennesseanalsoreportsthat "no warning labels were present" when it attempted to replicate the video's example. Perhaps Targeted Victory's memo, which was acquired exclusively by thePost, includes damning evidence of Gmail discriminating against Republican campaign emails. But that's not what the video shows, and that's not what Ferguson saw. (ThePostdid not respond toReason'srequest for the memo.) A Google spokesperson offered an alternative explanation toThe Tennessean: Gmail's "filters are applied equally to everyone, regardless of their political views." As the spokesperson explained to the paper, "a third-party vendor placed WinRed on its blocklist…after campaigns sent emails with links to WinRed to Gmail users who hadn't opted in to receiving emails. Email servers like Google regularly receive lists from third-party services of potentially harmful or unwanted links and emails." Ferguson also cites acommentjointly filed on behalf of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) to the FTC'srequest for public comments regarding technology platform censorship, which claims that "a mere 30 percent…of NRSC emails were successfully delivered to the primary inboxes of Gmail users." The letter does not provide a source, nor does it specify what percentage of analogous Democratic emails reached Gmail users' inboxes. Ferguson's last piece of evidence is the notice of oral argument inRepublican National Committee (RNC) v. Google Inc.(2025). In the case, which wasfirst dismissedin 2023 andagain with prejudicein 2024, the RNCallegesthat Google deliberately diverted its emails to users' spam folders. The chairman invokes the ongoing litigation as evidence of "similar concerns" to his own. Daniel J. Gilman, a senior antitrust scholar at the International Center for Law and Economics,remindsthe good chairman that the RNC's appeal "substantiates only the fact of the appeal, not the facts alleged, much less a finding of illegality under any federal or state law." Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Evidence that Ferguson does not appear to have. The postDonald Trump's Antitrust Enforcers Continue Their Harassment Campaign Against Googleappeared first onReason.com.

Republicans Say Gmail Is Blocking Their Fundraising Emails. We Recreated Their Test To See If That's True.

Republicans Say Gmail Is Blocking Their Fundraising Emails. We Recreated Their Test To See If That's True. Despitea defeat in federal co...

 

VOUX SPACE © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com